LiveVault vs. Quest Rapid Recovery

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
LiveVault
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
LiveVault is a data backup and recovery option acquired by J2 Global from Iron Mountain.N/A
Quest Rapid Recovery
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Quest Rapid Recovery is a data backup and restore offering from Dell. It provides virtual standby, encryption, replication, deduplication, and the ability for users to run without restore.
$1,819.99
Pricing
LiveVaultQuest Rapid Recovery
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
License + 1 Year 24/7 Maintenance
1,819.99
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
LiveVaultQuest Rapid Recovery
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
LiveVaultQuest Rapid Recovery
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
LiveVaultQuest Rapid Recovery
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
LiveVault
8.5
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Quest Rapid Recovery
8.6
7 Ratings
6% above category average
Universal recovery6.01 Ratings6.05 Ratings
Instant recovery9.01 Ratings3.15 Ratings
Recovery verification6.01 Ratings8.05 Ratings
Business application protection9.01 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations9.01 Ratings10.06 Ratings
Incremental backup identification9.01 Ratings10.07 Ratings
Backup to the cloud9.01 Ratings10.04 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression9.01 Ratings10.07 Ratings
Snapshots9.01 Ratings10.07 Ratings
Flexible deployment8.01 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Platform support9.01 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Retention options9.01 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Encryption9.01 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Management dashboard00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Best Alternatives
LiveVaultQuest Rapid Recovery
Small Businesses
Veeam Data Platform
Veeam Data Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
Veeam Data Platform
Veeam Data Platform
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.7 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.7 out of 10
Bacula Enterprise
Bacula Enterprise
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
LiveVaultQuest Rapid Recovery
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(7 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
LiveVaultQuest Rapid Recovery
Likelihood to Recommend
Ziff Davis Inc
Our company was originally with VaultLogix which was taken over by LiveVault. The transition to the new product was not as smooth as expected and presented us with issues especially with a restore. Restore and what files needed to be included in the backup policy were not communicated to us correctly and it was not until a customer's server failed that we found out we couldn't do a restore because we were missing files that were needed for a complete restore.
I don't believe it works very well for backups of virtual servers. Installation of the product is user-friendly.
Read full review
Quest
AppAssure works well for quick access to point in time backups of Windows machines without having to do a complete restore. The virtual standby function is useful as a disaster recovery or high availability solution. Recent upgrades to the product and rebranding to Rapid Recovery look promising. If your Linux machines are mission [critical] make sure your administrators test restores so they can perform them in a timely manner should the need arise.
Read full review
Pros
Ziff Davis Inc
  • Easy to install the client piece.
  • Easy to setup the backup policies.
  • Data encryption and security.
Read full review
Quest
  • Continuous backup with deduplication and compression
  • The P to V function of the software is create. To be able to back up physical machines and create a hot spare on a virtual environment was a great selling point.
  • Can back up physical and virtual (ESX or Hyper-V).
Read full review
Cons
Ziff Davis Inc
  • It does not play very well with virtual servers.
  • Support is not always responsive.
  • Issues with failed backups have cost our company time and money.
Read full review
Quest
  • Support for newer operating systems (Windows, Linux, VMware) is slow to be added. Usually takes 3-6 months from the new version being released for it to be supported.
  • There is no way to automate the testing of the virtual standby which a lot of comparable products are able to do.
  • The software has a backup type called "base image" which is essentially taking a full backup after an unexpected shutdown of the server. If your servers crash and they are very large, this may impact your storage requirements significantly. They do now have synthetic full backups which alleviate this issue a bit but they are not perfect either.
Read full review
Support Rating
Ziff Davis Inc
No answers on this topic
Quest
In the very few instances we've needed support they have been quick, friendly, knowledgeable, and dedicated to servicing our needs. That has only improved since AppAssure was bought out by Quest.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Ziff Davis Inc
No answers on this topic
Quest
Our initial installation really was not optimum. With the help from Dell Profession Services we were able to get our implementation sized correctly and better understand how to get better deduplication results
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Ziff Davis Inc
LiveVault is the only product we have used. The reason is that we chose it initially was the fact you can restore individual files. Also that the data is transferred offsite to a secure data center and data is backed up again, providing a second offsite copy.
Read full review
Quest
I've been using Rapid Recovery for the last 6 years and before that we had used Backup Exec, but it was a different implementation as we were still running backups to LTO3 tapes using the full/incremental backup schemes. So Rapid Recovery (AppAssure at the time) was a big change for us, backing up to disk instead with base images and changes. I would assume Backup Exec can do this as well, but haven't used it since switching. NovaBACKUP was a lower cost solution that seemed geared towards smaller and simpler configurations
Read full review
Return on Investment
Ziff Davis Inc
  • LiveVault has initially cost us more labor time than we anticipated for our IT staff.
  • Installing cloud backup has given us a piece of mind that our data and our customer's data is safe.
Read full review
Quest
  • AppAssure paid for itself in the first year of usage. A user deleted a major file in our SharePoint sub-site, we used the DocRetriever for SharePoint Console and were able to go back to a particular incremental date and retrieved that file.
  • One of our file shares crashed and we were able to put the physical server on a virtual standby which saved us hours of imaging and restoring of data. This allowed employees to efficiently continue their daily work without much downtime.
  • The offsite replication alone has put an ease on the company in case of any disaster. When Hurricane Sandy hit, we didn't have a solution in place which put us on pins and needles to say the least. But with AppAssure we will be able to have some comfort that all of our mission critical data is being offloaded onto our other sites.
Read full review
ScreenShots