Appgate SDP vs. FatPipe MPVPN

It is best suited for larger companies with lots of remote workers that need complex access management. We've barely scratched the surface on what Appgate can do via its API.

Incentivized

If you need multiple ISPs for wan aggregation or site to site failover. This box can tolerate failures of ISPs and sites with less than 1-3 seconds of outage time.

Incentivized

• Software-Defined perimeter
• Hide resources to non-authorized/authenticated users.

Incentivized

• Load balancing of ISPs
• Site to site failover
• SmartDNS

Incentivized

• Live logging in the client. Currently you have to "download" the logs into a zip file and then open that zipfile to look at the logs. There's no logfile to tail or watch.
• Load balancing between controllers could be better. Currently relies on round robin DNS and sometimes a browser will pick a different IP than previous and you'll get a big "LOST CONNECTION TO CONTROLLER" message.

Incentivized

• Could use a training manual.

Incentivized

The company has been supportive overall of our needs and desired features. I have not personally called the support services, but I've heard no direct complaints either.

Incentivized

The existing system was FortiGate. The management of the system was a hassle. Because IT personnel had to manually create VPN accounts, user passwords were known to who created them and the end user did not have a way to change them. This created a security issue in the event an IT engineer left the company.

Incentivized

Fatpipe invented SD-WAN over 25 years ago and has been leading the way. Other companies I think have just ridden their coattails.

Incentivized

• We are achieving our goals with this tool by hiding resources behind it.
• It is a new model that requires a different thought process for many in network operations.

Incentivized

• We have lost ISPs without any business disconnections.
• Business continuity at its best.

Incentivized