Appian vs. IFS Applications

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Appian
ScoreĀ 8.5Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
N/A
Appian is a low-code development and business process management platform. It features drag-and-drop design for app building, automated work processes, unified data management, and cloud-based deployment.
$0
IFS Applications
ScoreĀ 7.3Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
N/A
IFS Applications is presented by the vendor as an agile application suite that offers enterprise resource planning (ERP), enterprise asset management (EAM) and enterprise project management, handling 4 core processes: Service & Asset Management Full Enterprise Asset Management (EAM), Maintenance Repair and Overhaul (MRO) and Field Service Management (FSM) Manufacturing Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) with support for process manufacturing, discrete manufacturingā€¦N/A
Pricing
AppianIFS Applications
Editions & Modules
Appian Community Edition
$0
Application - Input-Only
$2
per month per user
Application - Infrequent
$9
per month per user
Application - Standard
$75
per month per user
Platform
Custom Quote Priced per user with unlimited apps.
minimum 100 users, no maximum
Unlimited
Custom Quote Priced per development with unlimited apps.
unlimited
Platform
Custom Quote Priced per user with unlimited apps.
Minimum 100, no maximum
Unlimited
Custom Quote Priced per development with unlimited apps.
Unlimited
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AppianIFS Applications
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Detailsā€”ā€”
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AppianIFS Applications
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
AppianIFS Applications
Low-Code Development
Comparison of Low-Code Development features of Product A and Product B
Appian
9.1
75 Ratings
8% above category average
IFS Applications
-
Ratings
Visual Modeling8.873 Ratings00 Ratings
Drag-and-drop Interfaces8.972 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Security9.271 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform User Management8.872 Ratings00 Ratings
Reusability9.575 Ratings00 Ratings
Platform Scalability9.573 Ratings00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
2.6
2 Ratings
94% below category average
Pay calculation00 Ratings3.92 Ratings
Benefit plan administration00 Ratings3.92 Ratings
Direct deposit files00 Ratings3.02 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
8.4
4 Ratings
11% above category average
API for custom integration00 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Plug-ins00 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
9.7
4 Ratings
17% above category average
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings9.94 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings9.54 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
7.8
4 Ratings
8% above category average
Dashboards00 Ratings6.94 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings7.44 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings8.94 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
7.4
4 Ratings
4% below category average
Accounts payable00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Accounts receivable00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Global Financial Support00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings8.53 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings8.43 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings8.93 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
8.6
4 Ratings
9% above category average
Inventory tracking00 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Automatic reordering00 Ratings9.04 Ratings
Location management00 Ratings8.94 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
5.3
4 Ratings
39% below category average
Pricing00 Ratings7.94 Ratings
Order entry00 Ratings8.44 Ratings
Credit card processing00 Ratings5.93 Ratings
Cost of goods sold00 Ratings6.44 Ratings
Order Orchestration00 Ratings6.43 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.4
3 Ratings
75% below category average
Billing Management00 Ratings6.43 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings7.43 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings7.43 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings6.43 Ratings
Period Close00 Ratings8.43 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
2.7
1 Ratings
95% below category average
Budgeting and Forecasting00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
Project Costing00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Cost Capture00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Capital Project Management00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition00 Ratings2.01 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.6
3 Ratings
63% below category average
Project Planning and Scheduling00 Ratings9.93 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers00 Ratings8.93 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality00 Ratings7.93 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools00 Ratings7.93 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
10.0
1 Ratings
29% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
3.3
3 Ratings
71% below category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared00 Ratings7.92 Ratings
Contract Authoring00 Ratings6.92 Ratings
Contract Repository00 Ratings6.92 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated00 Ratings9.43 Ratings
Supplier Management00 Ratings9.43 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
4.6
3 Ratings
36% below category average
Risk Repository00 Ratings7.93 Ratings
Control Management00 Ratings8.43 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments00 Ratings7.93 Ratings
Issue Detection00 Ratings5.93 Ratings
Remediation and Certification00 Ratings6.93 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
6.3
3 Ratings
6% below category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Fulfillment Management00 Ratings5.02 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
6.2
3 Ratings
18% below category average
Production Process Design00 Ratings8.52 Ratings
Production Management00 Ratings7.93 Ratings
Configuration Management00 Ratings7.43 Ratings
Work Execution00 Ratings8.43 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs00 Ratings8.93 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
8.5
3 Ratings
18% above category average
Forecasting00 Ratings7.53 Ratings
Inventory Planning00 Ratings9.03 Ratings
Performance Monitoring00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Appian
-
Ratings
IFS Applications
4.3
3 Ratings
50% below category average
Proposal Management00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
Product Master Data Management00 Ratings7.52 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AppianIFS Applications
Small Businesses
Creatio
Creatio
ScoreĀ 9.5Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Zoho One
Zoho One
ScoreĀ 8.9Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Medium-sized Companies
Creatio
Creatio
ScoreĀ 9.5Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Infor VISUAL
Infor VISUAL
ScoreĀ 7.5Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Enterprises
Creatio
Creatio
ScoreĀ 9.5Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
SAP Business ByDesign
SAP Business ByDesign
ScoreĀ 8.5Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AppianIFS Applications
Likelihood to Recommend
9.2
(139 ratings)
7.9
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.5
(19 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(95 ratings)
7.9
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
8.4
(118 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
In-Person Training
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
6.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
1.0
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AppianIFS Applications
Likelihood to Recommend
Appian
Appian works great for automating manual processes and integrating multiple systems through its toolset. It gives great flexibility for establishing rules for approvals, routings, escalations, and the like. Because of the low code toolset, it's very easy to deploy and make changes as needed as processes evolve and as the organization learns to utilize the system better. Minimal maintenance is required to support the applications build on the platform. Some of the automated testing integration with tools like Jenkins is limited so that may be an issue for some.
Read full review
IFS
Order to cash processes and scenario are implemented natively in IFS. An HR module exists for career management also (objectives, comportments, training, mobility) but may be improved in terms of workflow validation (e.g. training to validate by a manager) or reporting.
Read full review
Pros
Appian
  • Allows at a glance workflow documentation which assists in the need we have for information readiation.
  • Drag and drop interface for workflow development greatly speeds our apps time to market.
  • Using the advanced features of Appian, we are able to create working sites in a fraction of the time it would take to do so using "traditional" development.
Read full review
IFS
  • Easy to configure and customize.
  • Facilitates financial reporting.
  • Easy to interface with external applications.
Read full review
Cons
Appian
  • Search issues when type ahead and database search are used in the same field.
  • Buttons implementation where user is require[d] to click on the button description - if clicks on the button outside that text - button will not work.
  • Problems with using certain off-the-shelf performance tools like WebLoad or Neoload. That is because of different dynamic variables being used internally in Appian - which these tools are unable to correlate. We are still investigating using other tools like Jmeter to overcome dynamic correlation problem for performance testing.
Read full review
IFS
  • Customer Service
  • User Experience
  • Implementation
  • Follow-through
  • Automation
  • Integrations
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Appian
We recently renewed our license with Appian. We are convinced that its flexibility, relative ease of use, the support they provide, there mobile advancements and their general willingness and desire to see us succeed all contributed to our reason to renew our agreement with Appian
Read full review
IFS
No answers on this topic
Usability
Appian
Appian is a low code environment, because of this, a very good visual interface is required. Appian is providing a feature-rich dashboard [that] we can use for building the dashboards and other interfaces. Appian also provides patches and releases to enhance these features. A developer can start off development just by going through a basic course from the Appian learning community.
Read full review
IFS
In our organization, the IFS Applications is being used in most processes starting from Business Opportunity processes to Sales Order delivery processes where the IFS Applications helps us to raise procurement requests for SCM, Production schedules for the Shop Floor, Supplier invoicing, Customer Invoicing. Additionally, the Payroll process is completely automated where travel requests to employee attendance is being directly captured in ifs cloud.
Read full review
Support Rating
Appian
Appian is one of the leading low code business automation platforms that support RPA, decision rules, case management, workflow automation, and machine learning all in a single bundle. But it is also harder to implement and replace the traditional business process.
Read full review
IFS
We have been unable to get answers to our questions, solutions to our problems, and they don't seem interested in working in the construction industry.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Appian
As analyst I participated in a developer boot camp. At times it was hard to keep up but most of the time it made sense. Trainer took the time to explain and slowed pace down to answer questions etc.
Read full review
IFS
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Appian
Very boring; hard to get through quickly, but rather effective in demonstrating the use of the platform.
Read full review
IFS
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Appian
It was really seamless. SaaS in the true definition of the word. We logged on and started using the product. Very easy.
Read full review
IFS
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Appian
Appian has enormously transformed and keeps on updating the product every quarter to meet the latest needs of the world with new innovations & technologies being integrated within the platform. What gives more pleasure than a product that keeps on continuous[ly] improv[ing]?
Read full review
IFS
Microsoft AX, QAD (in continuation of our previous ERP), Sage X3 was an out of the box ERP that was part of initial RFP. We have chosen IFS based on the compromise between costs & budget, functionality, technical features, and feedback from similar customers that gave their feedback. The project manager team and qualification level of technical or consultant teams were differentiating factors too. Finally IFS application was named in the Gartnerā€™s mid-market ERP Magic Quadrant, along with SAP, and helped us to finalize our choice
Read full review
Return on Investment
Appian
  • I believe it has negatively impacted our release dates. There may have been a misunderstanding as to the learning curve, even though it is "low code."
  • The look and feel of the applications created using Appian have uniformity and it's easier to have "reuse" between applications.
  • There is less developer control when it comes to features. I think this mainly has to do with the amount of plugins available. I would think there should be many more available plugins. But again, our use case is probably different than most others.
Read full review
IFS
  • Positive impact in terms of global process alignment.
  • Positive impact in terms of a single system of truth and reporting.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Appian Screenshots

Screenshot of Low-Code DevelopmentScreenshot of Business Process Management SuiteScreenshot of Dynamic Case ManagementScreenshot of Mobile App DevelopmentScreenshot of Appian RPA with Blue Prism

IFS Applications Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of