Applause vs. Quizizz

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Applause
Score 6.1 out of 10
N/A
Applause headquartered in Framingham in Massachusetts offers application testing services.N/A
Quizizz
Score 6.1 out of 10
N/A
Quizizz is a learning platform that uses gamified quizzes to help people learn or teach anything, on any device, in-person or remotely. Quizizz is used by more than 20 million people per month in schools, homes, and offices around the world. The platform is used in classrooms in over 100 countries across the globe, and in over 50 percent of U.S. schools. They say they help educators and training professionals conduct quick assessments on any topic, and analyze results instantly—no grading…N/A
Pricing
ApplauseQuizizz
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ApplauseQuizizz
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
ApplauseQuizizz
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
Applause
-
Ratings
Quizizz
8.3
2 Ratings
3% below category average
Course authoring00 Ratings5.62 Ratings
Course catalog or library00 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Player/Portal00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Learning content00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Progress tracking & certifications00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Learning reporting & analytics00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Social learning00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Gamification00 Ratings8.12 Ratings
eLearning Content
Comparison of eLearning Content features of Product A and Product B
Applause
-
Ratings
Quizizz
8.4
2 Ratings
0% below category average
Multi-Lingual Support00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Structured Learning00 Ratings7.62 Ratings
Course Searches00 Ratings6.02 Ratings
Historical Metrics00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Cloud-Based Content00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Automation & Integration00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ApplauseQuizizz
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

iSpring Learn
iSpring Learn
Score 9.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Infosec Skills
Infosec Skills
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Infosec Skills
Infosec Skills
Score 9.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ApplauseQuizizz
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(12 ratings)
6.1
(6 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.2
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
6.4
(1 ratings)
6.6
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
ApplauseQuizizz
Likelihood to Recommend
Applause
Tester skill and experience is varied so it's important for the project manager to properly understand your requirements. The better they can build a team to suit your needs, the better your results will be. This will require a number of test cycles and fine tuning to get it right. It also fares better with consumer applications which are designed for the "common" user. For example, if you have a niche product designed for businesses, this type of testing may not be a good fit.
Read full review
Quizizz Inc.
Quizizz is very well suited for my elementary and middle school-aged students. It is fast-paced, competitive, and keeps their attention. I would not think it would be as well implemented in lower (k-2) grades. I love the fact that it is aligned with Generation Genius, which is another site I use for instruction.
Read full review
Pros
Applause
  • In-the-wild testing - it cannot be done internally. It's impossible to cover the wide matrix of devices and OS versions.
  • Exploratory testing - more eyes see more. Every mind is unique and thinks of a workflow differently - provides better coverage of the product.
  • Care provided by test lead is essential - they help a lot with initial bug triage and bug transfer to our internal systems.
  • Retest of found tickets once they are fixed - saves time!
  • Applause people make a good effort to create a relationship, it's not just business.
Read full review
Quizizz Inc.
  • It has a large library of already-made quizzes that can be searched fairly easily.
  • It has side-by-side views of what the students see and what the teacher sees.
Read full review
Cons
Applause
  • In using MBM (Mobile Beta Management), it would be better to have the surveys be based on completion of a specific task instead of time or number of app access. This might be a little more complex to set up, but would be well worth it.
  • A "stakeholder management" view would be nice to allow those not normally using the tool to get a quick status of testing.
  • A "stakeholder management" view for MBM would be nice to allow those not normally using the tool to get a quick status of progress and user feedback.
Read full review
Quizizz Inc.
  • Modifying existing quizzes often simply does not work: the system looks up when I try to add new items.
  • Quizizz has no easily discovered way to change titles of quizzes.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Applause
The one missing point is for the price - it's quite expensive to maintain the service to the extent of how we use it (dozens of test cycles and hundreds of test case hours on monthly basis). However the benefits still weights the price, especially when thinking of the price of potential hot fixes. Still, the price can be a reason to take a look on how competition is doing.
Read full review
Quizizz Inc.
No answers on this topic
Usability
Applause
The UI and the whole app is updated on regular basis, quite often actually. There are some cool features, like integration with several other bug tracking tools, which makes the bug management really easy. However there are some key usability issues within some of the less used workflows, which brings the score down a bit. They need to work on better switching between products and better bug search, especially across purchased products.
Read full review
Quizizz Inc.
All reports are very informative and you can analyze the data by student, by class, or by question. The ease of sharing the assignments via Google Classroom is seamless! Teachers can input their own media and questions for anything (quiz, test, survey, emotional check in, etc)
Read full review
Support Rating
Applause
I know the score doesn't really correspond with my earlier answers, but I have really special relationship with the Applause people. I don't really go through official support. I rather use my internal connections to make my request handled as soon as possible - and it works really well! I don't need to go through the official channels. And it's known that the unofficial ones are much more effective. I can confirm!
Read full review
Quizizz Inc.
We switched out Google domain, and their support people transferred everthing
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Applause
I didn't need to be involved at all. It was seamless from our perspective. All products were inserted in by Vendor, only Test Cycles we needed to insert ourselves initially. Now even that is handled by Vendor. The only thing we need to pay attention now is - to request cycles at the right time and review the bugs found during the test cycles. Nothing else. Very good experience!
Read full review
Quizizz Inc.
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Applause
By the time we signed the contract, there was no competition to Applause (back in time the company was called uTest). Ever since, we didn't evaluate anyone else because we built a very close relationship, which works for both sides. I think Applause is the furthest in building the test community
Read full review
Quizizz Inc.
Since many online fun checks are not available in the market, we choose Quizziz because it is easier to use than the others, it has a user icon to use ( which is fun to choose), the site is easy to find. No lag and crash of website.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Applause
  • Positive
  • - we were able to provide good QA on an increased number of deliverables in a shorter period of time.
  • - great interaction with the Applause team, test leads and others
  • - high quality candidates added to our team
  • Negative
  • - the contract model (based on number of projects for specified monthly periods) was a little tricky for our development life cycles and left us at times wanting to engage test cycles but unable to do so while simultaneously having a project sitting idle for weeks after test cycles completed. Our business model was not a great fit for the contract model.
Read full review
Quizizz Inc.
  • Fewer meetings necessary - can check via poll or quiz
  • Presentations made available at any time
  • Reusable resources frees up HR personnel time
Read full review
ScreenShots