Adjust by AppLovin vs. Looker Studio

According to my experience, I was able to integrate the Adjust by AppLovin to my marketing channels so that I made better and more detailed measurements for our apps. It was working with other 3rd party and marketing platforms very well. We analyzed the customer journey better after they downloaded or deleted the app. And user information is not kept inside the app makes it very trustable.

Incentivized

Visualizing cross-channel campaign performance can blend data from a few different sources to compare performance metrics like spend, clicks, and conversions side-by-side in a single view, which helps in quick budget reallocation decisions. When dealing with massive volumes of data (millions of rows) or highly complex queries, Looker Studio dashboards can become slow, laggy, or even crash. Performance issues are a frequent complaint when working with large datasets, making it unsuitable for enterprise-level companies

Incentivized

• Tracking installs on mobile app campaigns on Android or iOS, as well as UAC campaigns.
• Tracking in-app actions on our mobile campaigns.
• Showing more accurate numbers, since it counts pure installs from new users only without counting re-installs,
• Counts installs only after first opening of the app, while Google and Apple count also downloads even if the app doesn't get installed or opened after.

Incentivized

• Breath of data - the number of ways to interrogate the data is endless, and the options to view metrics alongside each other make for comprehensive datasets.
• Data visualisation and customisation - the options for presenting data and separating out across pages allow for clean visuals and segmented information.
• Easy shareability/usability - a quick and simple tool to introduce colleagues to, and easy to grant access for them to be able to view the data, without having to understand the setup itself.

Incentivized

• UI is very confusing and needs a refresh.
• Reports are very limited and need more granularity.
• Onboarding program for agencies lacks concrete information.

Incentivized

• It needs better handling of complex logic. We often need workarounds to perform complex custom calculations, and it can be really unpleasant at times.
• Felt it got slow with a larger data set, and in one minor report, we had to set up time filters so that calculations during spikes could be traced more quickly.
• Compare to competition they need to improve with notification things.

Incentivized

We are happy to use Adjust by AppLovin in our measurements and effects on the business, so the company would like to renew our use.

Incentivized

It is the simplest and least expensive way for us to automate our reporting at this time. I like the ability to customize literally everything about each report, and the ability to send out reports automatically in emails. The only issue we have been having recently is a technical glitch in the automatic email report. Sadly, there is almost no support for this tool from Google, but is also free, so that is important to take into consideration

Incentivized

Looker Studio is easy to use, and it offers a sufficient variety of predefined visualizations to choose from. It's easy for us, and anyone can set up basic reporting without extensive data visualization skills. The interface layout is easy to understand, and it doesn't take long to get used to.

Incentivized

Adjust Attribution is great on Amplitude if tagged/integrated right.

Incentivized

I give it a lower support rating because it seems like our Dev team hasn't gotten the support they need to set up our database to connect. Seems like we hit a roadblock and the project got put on pause for dev. That sucks for me because it is harder to get the dev team to focus on it if they don't get the help they need to set it up.

Incentivized

I would recommend AppsFlyer over Adjust, as they have a better UI, clearer solutions, and better customer success than Adjust. Regarding Singular, Adjust is lagging behind the reporting tools and analytics.

Incentivized

Looker Studio is far easier to implement, stand up, and learn. The interface is simpler and user-friendly for various levels of data visualization/analysis knowledge and experience. The biggest benefit of Looker Studio, however, is its ease of connection to GA data and speed. Furthermore, since it is an online program/tool, it requires less CPU/battery/storage on the user's device.

Incentivized

• It has helped us stop fraud, improving ROI.
• Cheaper than the competition improving ROI.
• Helped us identify non performing media channels, improving ROI.

Incentivized

• Free, so the only investment is time
• Because it doesn't have native support of non-Google sources, it can cost more money than Tableau
• The time spent formatting the templates or building connectors can have a negative impact on ROI
• As a agency, charging for the reporting service is profitable after the first month or two after building the dashboard.

Incentivized