Aruba Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) vs. Cisco Meraki MX

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Aruba Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN)
Score 5.8 out of 10
N/A
HPE company Aruba Networks launched their Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) product in 2018.N/A
Cisco Meraki MX
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Meraki MX Firewalls is a combined UTM and Software-Defined WAN solution. Meraki is managed via the cloud, and provides core firewall services, including site-to-site VPN, plus network monitoring.
$595
per appliance
Pricing
Aruba Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN)Cisco Meraki MX
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
MX64
$595
per appliance
MX67
$695
per appliance
MX68
$995
per appliance
MX84
$1,995
per appliance
MX100
$4,995
per appliance
MX250
$9,995
per appliance
MX450
$19,995
per appliance
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Aruba Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN)Cisco Meraki MX
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Aruba Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN)Cisco Meraki MX
Considered Both Products
Aruba Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN)

No answer on this topic

Cisco Meraki MX
Chose Cisco Meraki MX
We were able to transition very easily from Cisco to Cisco Meraki MX's and connect the LANs into a single easy to manage WAN with remote access VPN and auto VPN between branches to interconnect all networks with minimal fuss but allowing high-speed networking and traffic …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Aruba Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN)Cisco Meraki MX
Firewall
Comparison of Firewall features of Product A and Product B
Aruba Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN)
-
Ratings
Cisco Meraki MX
7.6
64 Ratings
11% below category average
Identification Technologies00 Ratings7.861 Ratings
Visualization Tools00 Ratings8.161 Ratings
Content Inspection00 Ratings7.361 Ratings
Policy-based Controls00 Ratings7.260 Ratings
Active Directory and LDAP00 Ratings7.453 Ratings
Firewall Management Console00 Ratings7.662 Ratings
Reporting and Logging00 Ratings7.364 Ratings
VPN00 Ratings7.461 Ratings
High Availability00 Ratings8.160 Ratings
Stateful Inspection00 Ratings8.156 Ratings
Proxy Server00 Ratings7.634 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Aruba Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN)Cisco Meraki MX
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

SonicWall TZ
SonicWall TZ
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 8.6 out of 10
Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 8.6 out of 10
Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Next-Generation Firewalls - PA Series
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Aruba Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN)Cisco Meraki MX
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(3 ratings)
7.7
(93 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(4 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(5 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(14 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(59 ratings)
User Testimonials
Aruba Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN)Cisco Meraki MX
Likelihood to Recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Have remote sites and need them to feel local? Want to get all your locations virtually on the same network? This is the way. And if you're like us and need an easy way to manage all your remote locations in one place this is the tool you want to use.
Read full review
Cisco
So most use cases, this product fits. There aren't that many situations where it doesn't, and I've put it inside of banks. I've used it inside of schools, I've used it at normal businesses, big, bigger, and or small, but very small use cases where it has not, and we could not lead with it was at some banks. They did require NetOver VPN when communicating with higher-fed entities. If in the future Meraki could include NetOver VPN, then this would just be an auto-include for most of our deployments.
Read full review
Pros
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • An intricate system of connections that make it seem like your outside sites are all on one single LAN
  • Well priced in their category as others are a bit pricier for the same services
  • Aruba is backed by a well staffed support team that can get you through your issues
Read full review
Cisco
  • The management is the best. I'm an old-fashioned networking guy, so I'm used to going to the site itself and connecting. For example, a console cable and start and start configuring. Now since the management is so easy on Meraki I can configure everything from the headquarters from where I sit in Israel and then just go to the site and connect and basically, it's plug and play. After I configure everything from my office in Israel, I can just go to the site for a few hours, and connect everything. Just the magic happens.
Read full review
Cons
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • The right support team for your product can be difficult to get ahold of
  • Integration with Cisco is not as super tight as integration with Aruba devices
  • Some of the advanced features are difficult to use
Read full review
Cisco
  • Firewall Policies
  • Hardware Performance Statistics
  • IPS Performance + Efficacy
  • Limited port counts when leveraging network templates on higher end units.
  • No options for HTTPS decrypt or encrypt visibility
  • No EIGRP Routing
  • No ability to clear ARP table / release DHCP leases through GUI
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Cisco
As we have it in place now, we will continue to keep it at our remote sites. Future expansion is something we are reviewing, and may well start with some of the larger switches as they seem to offer good performance and management at a reasonable price. Wireless is also something we're investing in and their devices are great for that.
Read full review
Usability
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Cisco
The Cisco Meraki MX series is very easy to use. Setting up user VPN access, site to site VPN to tie multiple locations together and managing all your devices. You can even download the latest firmware and install without ever leaving the dashboard. Meraki is the very definition of easy to use
Read full review
Support Rating
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Cisco
I haven't ever had a bad experience with Meraki support. On the few occasions where I wasn't understanding the UI or needed some clarification about what a setting actually would do, I contacted them and they were very quickly able to provide help. Returns are simple and fast, too. We had to return a defective device one time and they shipped the replacement before we had even un-racked the one that was faulty. Unlike many other vendors, they didn't ask use to a do long list of scripted diagnostics, they just took my word for it that the device was broken and sent out a replacement immediately
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Cisco
Good product and simple to use.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Cisco
I have used Sonicwall and Meraki, and they are very similar and functional, but they go about it in different ways. Meraki is a little more user-friendly with less of a learning curve, but it comes at a little steeper price. I do like the online dashboard of Meraki better, though.
Read full review
Scalability
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
No answers on this topic
Cisco
Every network we create will allow us to automatically be attached in the mesh network. The ability for the automatic VPN connections is very convenient and allow us to focus on other configuration points without having to worry about if the VPN will work or not. The GUI showing the VPN is kind of confusing, but as long as it has direct connection to the other Meraki MX units, it will be up.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Changed the way we manage remote sites
  • Saved us funds in the LAN budget
  • Created new opportunities to roll out functions at these sites
Read full review
Cisco
  • Network hardware needs to function 100% of the time with no one really ever thinking about it - it just needs to work. Cisco delivers here.
  • The Cisco Meraki MX products are fast and reliable helping productivity.
  • Cisco's support is solid and helpful.
Read full review
ScreenShots