ArubaOS vs. Junos Network Operating System (Junos OS)

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ArubaOS
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
ArubaOS is the network operating system from Aruba Networks, an HPE company. ArubaOS includes AirMatch and ClientMatch, capabilities that monitor and optimize Wi-Fi power, channels, connections and bandwidth across the entire wireless network to improve user experience. Users can manage up to 10,000 APs, cluster up to 12 controllers, and segment traffic from one AP to multiple controllers with MultiZone.N/A
Junos OS
Score 7.1 out of 10
N/A
Junos is a network operating system, from Juniper Networks.N/A
Pricing
ArubaOSJunos Network Operating System (Junos OS)
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ArubaOSJunos OS
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ArubaOSJunos Network Operating System (Junos OS)
Considered Both Products
ArubaOS
Chose ArubaOS
Aruba does quite a good job with GUI configuration, especially with AOS 8 - something that Cisco struggles with (maybe they came up with something new now). Aruba can also easily scale. While not on the same level, Ubiquiti has a good GUI but is lacking a good standard …
Junos OS

No answer on this topic

Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
ArubaOSJunos Network Operating System (Junos OS)
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Enterprises
Cisco NX-OS
Cisco NX-OS
Score 9.4 out of 10
Cisco NX-OS
Cisco NX-OS
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ArubaOSJunos Network Operating System (Junos OS)
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
ArubaOSJunos Network Operating System (Junos OS)
Likelihood to Recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Aruba Wireless works quite well and is stable for enterprise. Once it's running, it works. Once you have it set up, you don't normally need to go in and make changes. Aruba is particularly good on pushing clients to use 5ghz (they say they use some kind of a proprietary algorithm). It may not be appropriate for smaller businesses due to cost and complexity
Read full review
Juniper Networks
Juniper Operating systems are well suited for distribution and edge networks. When we evaluated them for a proposal to core networks we decided to go with other vendors, as the processing capacity of core routers was lower. Typical environments Junos OS has fit in our organization are enterprise, customer edge, distribution networks.
Read full review
Pros
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Wireless Access
  • Security/Role Management
  • Firewalling
  • Centralized Management
Read full review
Juniper Networks
  • BGP auto-peering
  • Juniper ATP cloud for threat profiling
  • Segment Routing algorithms allows customization
Read full review
Cons
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Documentation on Aruba website is very lacking
  • Support is hit-or-miss - they may waste a lot of time before you get to someone who has a solution
  • Some configuration items are very non-intuitive
Read full review
Juniper Networks
  • GUI has come a long way, but can be improved
  • SDN features
  • Training, documentations and online discussion forums can be improved.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
Aruba does quite a good job with GUI configuration, especially with AOS 8 - something that Cisco struggles with (maybe they came up with something new now). Aruba can also easily scale. While not on the same level, Ubiquiti has a good GUI but is lacking a good standard controller - users have to stand their own.
Read full review
Juniper Networks
We have stuck to iOS for datacenter networks for many years due to familiarity and ease of use. Junos OS is well suited for business customers, due to cost-effectiveness and not frequent changes to end routers. Junos OS is very comparable to its competitors, but it bit behind on core layer solutions.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Hewlett Packard Enterprise
  • Good return on investment in terms of a working wireless network for thousands of users
  • However, troubleshooting and support may be difficult
  • Good integration with ClearPass
Read full review
Juniper Networks
  • Junos OS is cost effective
  • Uptime is impressive and has proven availability
  • Lack of training among employees has made it harder for few teams to troubleshoot
Read full review
ScreenShots