Atlassian Bamboo vs. Tricentis qTest

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Atlassian Bamboo
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
Australian company Atlassian offers Bamboo, a continuous integration server.
$1,200
1 remote agent
Tricentis qTest
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Tricentis qTest (formerly QASymphony) provides enterprise-level agile testing tools giving businesses visibility and control needed to ensure application quality in fast-paced development environments. Tricentis and QASymphony merged in summer 2018.
$1,200
per year per user
Pricing
Atlassian BambooTricentis qTest
Editions & Modules
1 Remote Agent
$1200
5 Remote Agents
$3200
10 Remote Agents
$5840
25 Remote Agents
$11,600
100 Remote Agents
$23,280
250 Remote Agents
$58,160
500 Remote Agents
$87,280
1000 Remote Agents
$133,840
2000 Remote Agents
$187,380
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Atlassian BambooTricentis qTest
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Atlassian BambooTricentis qTest
Features
Atlassian BambooTricentis qTest
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Bamboo
-
Ratings
Tricentis qTest
8.1
38 Ratings
0% above category average
Centralized test management00 Ratings8.037 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings8.232 Ratings
Map tests to user stories00 Ratings7.78 Ratings
Test execution reporting00 Ratings8.737 Ratings
Defect management00 Ratings7.832 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Atlassian BambooTricentis qTest
Small Businesses
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.6 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Atlassian BambooTricentis qTest
Likelihood to Recommend
6.3
(24 ratings)
8.6
(39 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
9.3
(5 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(6 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Atlassian BambooTricentis qTest
Likelihood to Recommend
Atlassian
If you value integration over cost, Bamboo is clearly the way to go. It offers tight integration to the rest of the Atlassian suite, and when you need traceability from issue to build, Atlassian is the right way to go. However, if you find yourself needing to save on costs, you may consider taking an approach of rolling your own build system with open source alternatives, such as Jenkins, if you don't [mind] putting in a little extra elbow grease.
Read full review
Tricentis
Tricentis qTest integrates seamlessly with Jira, making it ideal for teams that manage user stories and defects in Jira while keeping test cases and execution in qTest. When paired with automation tools like tosca, Selenium, or WebdriverIO, qTest is excellent for aggregating both manual and automated test results in one place.
Read full review
Pros
Atlassian
  • Levels of granularity. Organization has many projects that have many build plans that have many jobs that have many tasks, etc. And branch builds allow source control branches to be built separately.
  • Versatility. I can use bamboo to manage my Java, node, or .NET build plans. I can use it to spin up Windows or Linux build agents, or install it on a Mac to build there as well.
  • Bamboo integrates with other Atlassian products like Bitbucket, Stash, JIRA, etc. If a company commits to the entire Atlassian stack then work can be tracked through the whole development lifecycle which is really useful.
Read full review
Tricentis
  • As a fresher, when I started using qTest it was very handy and easy to understand.
  • It helps us trace the test cases that are used to test the quality in a single location
  • The main thing is its integration with JIRA as soon as we create a ticket we would be getting all the requirements in the qTest so it became easy for me
Read full review
Cons
Atlassian
  • Extremely hard barrier to entry for non-backend developers
  • Blackbox makes it hard to customize functionality
  • The inability to add features without breaking core functionality
  • No cloud solution
  • Tasks cannot be put in if/else statements
  • No clear right way to form build plans
Read full review
Tricentis
  • In requirements , we can't add multiple test cases at once, or search multiple cases at once, need to do one by one. Here actually qtest needs to improve.
  • Linking cloud hosted qtest and on-premise TOSCA is very difficult especially when you are working with client system with security wall. It requires tunnelling software which is not recommended.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Tricentis
This has been a core QA management tool for our organization and integrates well with our other SDLC platforms (Azure DevOps/Jira/Katalon).
Read full review
Usability
Atlassian
Bamboo offers solid usability for teams looking for an integrated, scalable CI/CD solution, especially those using Atlassian tools. Its interface is intuitive for existing Atlassian users, and its focus on deployment automation makes it a strong option for continuous delivery. However, its complexity and cost may pose challenges for small teams or those new to CI/CD. Overall, Bamboo’s usability shines in environments where ease of integration and streamlined workflows are prioritized. Still, it may require more effort for teams unfamiliar with its setup or without dedicated resources.
Read full review
Tricentis
qTest is actually intuitive and user-friendly, despite my other scathing review aspects
Read full review
Support Rating
Atlassian
Bamboo is a fairly small product but having said that it was fairly easy to get assistance. Especially for the small to easy things. Anything large or fairly complex was an issue finding detailed answers for. This caused a lot of trial and error on our part to try to find a solution.
Read full review
Tricentis
The actual answer is 0. I have never experienced worse support, whether personal or professional
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Atlassian
No answers on this topic
Tricentis
Again, supporting documentation could have been a lot better
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian
We selected Bamboo because its capabilities to integrate with other Atlassian products specially Jira Software, Bitbucket and in some useful scenarios with Confluence. Also, we found these pros important for us: great user interface, easily agent deployment, Docker compability, simply to maintain / manage, and straightforwardly integration with different notification platforms
Read full review
Tricentis
All of them offer formidable solutions in the test management realm, but each one caters to different niche and need. qTest distinguishes itself with its deep integration capabilities, especially with Agile and DevOps tools, enabling streamlined CI/CD process. Its modern, user-centric interface contrasts with ALM's more dated appearance and complex setup. While TestRail provides a clean user experience and caters to a broad spectrum of business, qTest's scalability, from SMBs to large enterprises, stands out. PractiTest's cloud-based solution is geared towards mid-sized companies, but qTest's flexibility, advanced analytics, and robust reporting grant teams actionable insights. qTest' approach to a more holistic test management closely aligning with modern software development practices
Read full review
Return on Investment
Atlassian
  • It helped us achieve the Continuous Deployment and Continuous Integration goals for our applications, a huge milestone that saved a lot of time for developers in making the builds and deployments and saved time for QA in running the automated tests.
  • Helped with DevOps: we moved the formal approval from the email to the system and allowed the approver to actually push the button for the production deployments.
  • Biggest positive impact of using Bamboo is that it improved our response time to customers and increased the frequency of our deliveries to them.
Read full review
Tricentis
  • In comparison to other Testing tools, Tricentis qTest was the most expensive.
  • We were able to quickly bring international users up to speed on how to use the tool.
  • The ability to clone a project rather than create a new one from scratch was a valuable time saver.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Tricentis qTest Screenshots

Screenshot of Customizable analytics and reports can be shared across the organization - additional read license requiredScreenshot of Centrally manage automated testing and environments, as well as schedule and or kickoff automated testing with any open source or proprietary toolScreenshot of qTest allows for true test case sharing across teams and projects to help standardize and scale knowledge and best practicesScreenshot of qTest integrates in real-time with Jira for full traceability to requirements during Agile test and developmentScreenshot of Build custom, event-driven workflows with any third-party solution, including ChatOps tools like Slack and Microsoft Teams, to streamline testing and drive collaborationScreenshot of Tricentis qTest comes with over 60 out-of-the-box metrics, with drag-and-drop capabilities to build custom dashboards