Atlassian Bitbucket vs. k6

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bitbucket
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Bitbucket is a Git repository and code collaboration platform, featuring automated testing and code deployment. Bitbucket Cloud Premium provides AI-powered development, more granular access controls, and enforced code quality, and Bitbucket Data Center provides a self-hosted option.
$0
k6
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
Grafana Labs' k6 load testing tool (formerly known as Load Impact)is used to simplify and automate load and performance testing for agile software development teams. Through integration with other automation and Continuous Integration tools, k6 states they enable performance testing earlier in the development cycle.
$59
per month
Pricing
Atlassian Bitbucketk6
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
for up to 5 users
Standard
$3.30
per month per user
Premium
$6.60
per month per user
Bitbucket Data Center
starting at $44,000
per year 1 - 500
Developer
$59
per month (annual plan)
Team
$339
per month (annual plan)
Pro
$1,199
per month (annual plan)
Custom & Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Bitbucketk6
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Atlassian Bitbucketk6
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Atlassian Bitbucketk6
Version Control Software Features
Comparison of Version Control Software Features features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Bitbucket
7.7
3 Ratings
3% below category average
k6
-
Ratings
Branching and Merging8.43 Ratings00 Ratings
Version History9.33 Ratings00 Ratings
Version Control Collaboration Tools9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Pull Requests9.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Code Review Tools4.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Project Access Control9.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Testing Integration4.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue Tracking Integration7.73 Ratings00 Ratings
Branch Protection7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Load Testing
Comparison of Load Testing features of Product A and Product B
Atlassian Bitbucket
-
Ratings
k6
8.0
1 Ratings
5% below category average
End to end performance management00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Real time monitoring00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Automated anomaly detection00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Atlassian Bitbucketk6
Small Businesses
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Git
Git
Score 10.0 out of 10
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.8 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce Helix Core
Perforce Helix Core
Score 6.6 out of 10
JMeter
JMeter
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Atlassian Bitbucketk6
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(66 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.5
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.3
(14 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Atlassian Bitbucketk6
Likelihood to Recommend
Atlassian
As a team we need to push code into the repo on daily basis, Bitbucket has proven that is a reliable and secure server to save and get the code available in no time. The administration part is really easy and there's an extra tool for every developer profile either if you want to use the console or a GUI like Sourcetree.
Read full review
Grafana Labs
[k6 (formerly Load Impact)] is well suited to run performance automated suites and to run stress tests, spike tests and load tests[.] We can run tests from recorded [sessions] but we cannot run npm modules and we cannot run nod js libs[.]
Read full review
Pros
Atlassian
  • Very easy to integrate with other DevOps tools like Jenkins and with project/workflow management tools like JIRA.
  • Very efficient in managing security and compliance standards for code, especially during pull requests, merge requests, branching, etc.
  • Very robust in performance, especially the cloud and datacenter versions hardly hit any performance issues and supports more than 2000+ developers in my company.
Read full review
Grafana Labs
  • Load testing
  • Stress testing
  • Performance testing
  • Spike testing
Read full review
Cons
Atlassian
  • The code management UI is a bit rough around the edges and difficult to work with.
  • BitBucket does not have the same simplified PR management tools as other competitors.
  • It's not as easy to integrate 3rd party apps as other competitors.
Read full review
Grafana Labs
  • I would like to see k6 run in browsers
  • I would like to be able to import npm modules
  • I would like to see k6 has a GUI
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Atlassian
All products have room for improvement. The system improves over time with better and better integrations and I look forward to even more features without paying extra! The system has increased transparency across my organization and with this transparency comes increased throughput on projects. I don't think I can go back to any other system and we are definitely married to this product.
Read full review
Grafana Labs
No answers on this topic
Usability
Atlassian
The architecture of Bitbucket makes it more easily scalable than other source code management repositories. Also, administration and maintaining the instance is very easy. It integrates with JIRA and other CI/CD applications which makes it more useful to reduce the efforts. It supports multiple plugins and those bring a lot of extra functionality. It increases the overall efficiency and usefulness of Bitbucket.
Read full review
Grafana Labs
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Atlassian
The customer support provided by Atlassian (Bitbucket's parent company that also makes Jira, Confluence, etc.) is very helpful. They seem to be very concerned about any issues reported with their products and even just questions about functionality. They are constantly improving the products with new features in nearly every release. Plus they have a plethora of online documentation to reference.
Read full review
Grafana Labs
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Atlassian
For the features we were looking at, Bitbucket, GitHub and GitLab were all at par and were in a similar price range. We found that GitHub was the most full featured should we need to scale very quickly. GitLab was at par with GitHub for our future needs, but GitHub was a more familiar tool compared to GitLab. Bitbucket won out because of its close integration with Jira and being in the Atlassian family. It was also cheaper than GitHub. As we started with Jira, Bitbucket addition became a natural next step for us. We really liked Bitbucket and stayed with it but we do know we have great options in the form of GitHub and GitLab should we need to scale fast.
Read full review
Grafana Labs
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Atlassian
  • It's allowed for a lot of automation in terms of development workflows. It lets us pursue CI/CD approaches and get releases out faster
  • It has let us get our infrastructure configuration into VCS, which further improves our automation abilities.
  • It has aided in keeping track of changes, and allows us to keep workflows organized so we can track the status of development
Read full review
Grafana Labs
  • K6 make its easy to engage Devs in testing
  • Extremely fast installation make it count for us
  • Not using all system resources is a great benefit
Read full review
ScreenShots