AtomicWriter vs Episerver Content Cloud

• Makes my writing awesome.
• Restructures it.
• Gives me different writing formats.

Read full review

• Innovation - EPiServer is constantly looking at ways to improve their product and partner with organizations that can develop add-ons to improve the overall features of the core platform. For Example: SilverPop (marketing automation) and Celum (digital asset management).
• Content Management - It may seem obvious that a WCM product should manage content/reuse well; but, let's be honest, not all products do what they claim to do well. In this case, EPiServer understands the core functionality and has created product that is intuitive and exceeds customer expectations in this area.
• Previews - EPiServer has built-in templates (emulators) that allow you to easily confirm how your content is going to be displayed on a variety of devices before you publish your content. This is advantageous as it eliminates the guess work and need to redo content (or even code) after you've gone to production because you weren't able to thoroughly test it before hand.

Read full review

• Nothing too bad.
• Needs more features.
• Should be less expensive.

Read full review

• The website, including the editing portion, seems to be down quite often - so that we cannot make changes - or it allows us to make changes but then doesn't properly save them.
• Customer service and user support is lacking. We've reported problems to them, yet it never seems to get fixed.

Read full review

• Nothing at all
• -
• -

Read full review

• The cleanliness of the product is too damn good, hence efficiency is doubled and gets work done much faster and with a clean mind.
• APIs and libraries or modules implementation is easy which helps during make/test setup time.
• Nothing negative as such for now. We need to get more used to it.

Read full review