AtomicWriter vs. MadCap Flare

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AtomicWriter
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
AtomicWriter helps users create original content optimized to maximize visibility for content marketing campaigns.N/A
MadCap Flare
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
MadCap Software, headquartered in La Jolla, offers MadCap Flare, a help authoring and technical writing tool featuring onboarding and support from MadCap, and a set of modules for designing advanced guides, aids, and web or application help aids.
$167
per month
Pricing
AtomicWriterMadCap Flare
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
MadCap Central
$1,500
per year
MadCap Flare
$1,999
per year
MadCap AMS
$2,999
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AtomicWriterMadCap Flare
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details—Includes a 12-month Platinum-level Maintenance Plan.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AtomicWriterMadCap Flare
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
AtomicWriterMadCap Flare
Content Creation
Comparison of Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
AtomicWriter
10.0
1 Ratings
21% above category average
MadCap Flare
-
Ratings
Ideation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Approval workflows10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content collaboration10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content calendar10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Network for content licensing/production10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Publishing
Comparison of Content Publishing features of Product A and Product B
AtomicWriter
9.4
1 Ratings
15% above category average
MadCap Flare
-
Ratings
Content hub10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Forms / Gated content10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Embedded CTAs10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content distribution9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content automation8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
AtomicWriter
8.2
1 Ratings
5% above category average
MadCap Flare
-
Ratings
Audience profiling and targeting7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Closed-loop tracking and reporting9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content performance analytics8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Campaign optimization dashboard9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Competitive analytics8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AtomicWriterMadCap Flare
Small Businesses
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AtomicWriterMadCap Flare
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
7.6
(4 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
3.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
AtomicWriterMadCap Flare
Likelihood to Recommend
Atomic Reach
AtomicWriter is especially suitable for blog writing and for this type of work. It also gives different formats and restructures it with a great view. I think that's it.
Read full review
MadCap Software
MadCap Flare has its problems, but it serves our team well as an authoring software. This would not be the case if we needed to regularly collaborate on articles, as Flare is prone to conflict issues when another person dares to breathe near an open topic. When working individually, though, it's fine. I'd love to see improvements to design, performance, and stability, but Flare remains one of the best softwares on the market for our needs as an authoring team. MadCap Central is well-suited to internal reviewing when every member is comfortable with Flare (the errors it tends to introduce set aside). SMEs, though, tend to find it hard to use. It's cluttered, some styles don't render, and it just seems like a failed attempt to reproduce Google Docs. I'd love to see improvements there, to help get our SMEs to want to use Central.
Read full review
Pros
Atomic Reach
  • Makes my writing awesome.
  • Restructures it.
  • Gives me different writing formats.
Read full review
MadCap Software
  • Snippets, variables, and conditioning are all good
  • Once you set it up, updating Help websites is easy.
Read full review
Cons
Atomic Reach
  • Nothing too bad.
  • Needs more features.
  • Should be less expensive.
Read full review
MadCap Software
  • The software is often quite buggy, and certain bugs seem to date back nearly a decade and still persist.
  • Customizing shortcuts is often an ordeal.
Read full review
Usability
Atomic Reach
No answers on this topic
MadCap Software
MadCap Flare is in desperate need of an overall redesign. It relies heavily on dozens and dozens of tiny buttons that contain dozens of nested features. Clicking the wrong button can cause your software to freeze and crash. Building targets can be an absolute mystery, as far as all the files involved. It also has a tendency to freeze and crash. There's typically a huge learning curve for new hires who've never used it--nothing is intuitive.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Atomic Reach
No answers on this topic
MadCap Software
I wish Google Docs would work for our purposes, but it doesn't have a lot of the technical writing features we need. Using Google Docs would make reviewing and edits much much quicker, but we need MadCap to house all our documents for our Help website.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Atomic Reach
  • Nothing at all
  • -
  • -
Read full review
MadCap Software
  • Saves time by offering a way to sync documents with other teammates.
  • Often requires time to troubleshoot random errors or bugs that pop up with seemingly no cause.
Read full review
ScreenShots

MadCap Flare Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of