ATOSS Staff Efficiency Suite vs. Blue Yonder Luminate Commerce

ATOSS is well suited for companies working with different work patterns and on different sites. It is also possible to block the changes for the past, which is really useful if payroll is centralized. The interfaces work with multiple systems as well. But in order to avoid having a huge database, it has to be carefully cleaned from time to time by a system admin, especially if you give access to multiple persons.

Incentivized

For small to medium retailers, JDA commerce suite is more appropriate.

Incentivized

• Flexibility on the configuration
• Security role access management

Incentivized

• Efficient order fulfillment that is based on demand and labor availability.
• Single view of inventory and order information.
• Ease of use.

Incentivized

• Reports are not so easy to use.
• No document upload.
• Some specific balances needed for our business are not easy to manage.

Incentivized

• Earlier JDA versions did not supporting all the protocols for integration for example, sonic MQ. We had to spend lot of time writing adapters for that.

Incentivized

This tool is suited for any airline company and based on a market benchmark done in 2009, we selected it as it was the only software that meets our requirements.

Incentivized

The decision was already made by the architects and by the time I joined [the company]. The JDA implementation was already in place. However, the cost of the product and the targeted retailers would have made a lot of sense when choosing JDA Commerce Suite.

Incentivized

• Less paper/Excel sheets: everything is centralized in the system
• Time saving
• Better communication: information is accessible faster and everywhere for the employees

Incentivized

• Reduction in slow-moving inventory and out of stock messages which in turn helped clients to get more ROI.
• Efficient inventory management across all DCs and stores increased the accuracy of promising of inventory and forecasts.

Incentivized