AuraQuantic vs. webMethods.io Integration

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AuraQuantic
ScoreĀ 5.0Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
N/A
AuraQuantic is a web-based Business Process Management platform, which includes modules for advanced data management, advanced analytics, connectivity, contextual encryption and external collaboration. The company is based in Miami and was founded in 2001.N/A
webMethods.io Integration
ScoreĀ 8.9Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
N/A
webMethods.io Integration (formerly webMethods Integration Cloud) from Software AG is designed to make it easy to connect SaaS apps and make business processes more efficient. It enables enterprise subject matter experts and eliminates integration silos, allowing users to integrate applications hosted in public or private clouds, as well as applications hosted on premises.N/A
Pricing
AuraQuanticwebMethods.io Integration
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AuraQuanticwebMethods.io Integration
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAuraQuantic is a process automation platform designed to reduce costs and increase business productivity. Our BPM software is made up of AuraQuantic Core and five additional Quanta (modules), which can be purchased as a whole or selected and combined to create a custom software solution.ā€”
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AuraQuanticwebMethods.io Integration
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
AuraQuanticwebMethods.io Integration
Cloud Data Integration
Comparison of Cloud Data Integration features of Product A and Product B
AuraQuantic
-
Ratings
webMethods.io Integration
7.7
1 Ratings
6% below category average
Pre-built connectors00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Connector modification00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Support for real-time and batch integration00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Data quality services00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Data security features00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Monitoring console00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AuraQuanticwebMethods.io Integration
Small Businesses
Creatio
Creatio
ScoreĀ 9.1Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Make
Make
ScoreĀ 9.2Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Medium-sized Companies
Quixy
Quixy
ScoreĀ 9.8Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Zapier
Zapier
ScoreĀ 8.9Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Enterprises
Quickbase
Quickbase
ScoreĀ 9.2Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
SAP Integration Suite
SAP Integration Suite
ScoreĀ 8.7Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AuraQuanticwebMethods.io Integration
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
AuraQuanticwebMethods.io Integration
Likelihood to Recommend
AuraQuantic
No answers on this topic
Software AG
We don't use webMethods.io Integration for scenarios where we need to integrate to on-premises legacy applications that have limited support for modern security controls such as OAuth 2.0 and transport encryption. Likewise, we don't use it for solutions that involve any of our systems that are controlled by safe-working processes. For those scenarios, of which we have many, we maintain on-premises webMethods Integration Server and Trading Networks instances to build and execute and support and monitor those solutions. This then requires us to hook our on-premises integration platform up to the webMethods.io Integration cloud, to ship messages between the two integration platforms. This all begs the question if a cloud solution cannot be used for all use cases or scenarios that the business has, then why add the complexity of using the cloud at all if you still need to maintain an on-premises solution to support the non-cloud appropriate scenarios.
Read full review
Pros
AuraQuantic
No answers on this topic
Software AG
  • Easy to use
  • Priced competitively
  • Supports robust and resilient integration solutions
Read full review
Cons
AuraQuantic
No answers on this topic
Software AG
  • Complex logic is hard to understand in simple diagrammatic user interface
  • User interface too simplistic for solutions that are complicated or go against the grain
  • Runtime observability could be improved
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
AuraQuantic
No answers on this topic
Software AG
webMethods.io IntegrationDescriptionWe uses webMethods.io Integration to solve some of our application to applications and business to business integration needs. It is the Integration Platform as a Service solution that we use in a mix with our continued use of webMethods Integration Server and Trading Networks on-premises. For any solutions that meet the use cases that we deem an appropriate fit for running in the cloud, we build those solutions using webMethods.io Integration. More specifically, we use webMethods.io Integration to synchronize changes in one application or system, in another application or system, by shipping data mutations via integration messaging and API calls. We also use webMethods.io Integration to integrate with external organizations. Our trading partners and supply chain partners provide APIs that we consume, and vice versa, to notify each other of business process events as they occur in the respective organizations. Please provide some detailed examples of things that webMethods.io Integration (webMethods Integration Cloud) does particularly well. Easy to usePriced competitivelySupports robust and resilient integration solutions please provide some detailed examples of areas where webMethods.io Integration (webMethods Integration Cloud) has room for improvement. These could be features that are hard to use, missing functionality, or just things that you'd like to see done differently. Complex logic is hard to understand in a simple diagrammatic user interface too simplistic for solutions that are complicated or go against the gain runtime observability could be improved please describe some specific scenarios based on your experience where webMethods.io Integration (webMethods Integration Cloud) is well suited, and/or scenarios where it is less appropriate. We don't use webMethods.io Integration for scenarios where we need to integrate to on-premises legacy applications that have limited support for modern security controls such as OAuth 2.0 and transport encryption. Likewise, we don't use it for solutions that involve any of our systems that are controlled by safe-working processes. For those scenarios, of which we have many, we maintain on-premises webMethods Integration Server and Trading Networks instances to build and execute and support and monitor those solutions. This then requires us to hook our on-premises integration platform up to the webMethods.io Integration cloud, to ship messages between the two integration platforms. This all begs the question if a cloud solution cannot be used for all use cases or scenarios that the business has, then why add the complexity of using the cloud at all if you still need to maintain an on-premises solution to support the non-cloud appropriate scenarios. What positive or negative impact (i.e. Return on Investment or ROI) has webMethods.io Integration (webMethods Integration Cloud) had on your overall business objectives?webMethods.io Integration is a cost-effective approach to integration in isolationwebMethods.io Integration as a supplement to on-premises integration is pointless and redundant and just adds complexity to the environment and additional costswebMethods.io Integration is a tough sell for organizations using Microsoft Azure integration products such as Logic AppswebMethods.io Integration has a faster time to market where the use case means standard provided adapters can be used describe how webMethods.io Integration (webMethods Integration Cloud) stacks up against them and why you selected webMethods.io Integration (webMethods Integration Cloud). For any organization which is already using Software AG products on-premises, such as webMethods Integration Server and Trading Networks, or Universal Messaging, evaluating and using webMethods.io Integration is the path of least resistance. It will be incredibly easy for your webMethods team to get up to speed on how to use webMethods.io Integration, and start developing new solutions on it. However in my opinion you should only add cloud to your integration product portfolio if you believe you can move 100% of your integration needs to the cloud. Otherwise, you will need to maintain an on-premises integration solution anyway, which means you end up with a more complex IT landscape by adding cloud to supplement on-premises integration for little benefit in terms of cost, complexity, and resourcing requirements. For organizations that are not already a Software AG shop, you should evaluate webMethods.io Integration on its merits, however, it's usually the right decision to double down on your existing products and vendors if you have no big issues with the current state. This is to say that if you are a Microsoft shop then adding Azure cloud products to your portfolio is pretty much inevitable, and avoiding the complexity of multiple clouds should also be something organizations consider.
Read full review
Return on Investment
AuraQuantic
No answers on this topic
Software AG
  • webMethods.io Integration is a cost effective approach to integration in isolation
  • webMethods.io Integration as a supplement to on-premises integration is pointless and redundant and just adds complexity to the environment and additional costs
  • webMethods.io Integration is a tough sell for organizations using Microsoft Azure integration products such as Logic Apps
  • webMethods.io Integration has a faster time to market where the use case means standard provided adapters can be used
Read full review
ScreenShots

AuraQuantic Screenshots

Screenshot of Customizable dashboards.Screenshot of Workflow/ task control and monitoring.Screenshot of Visual process models / diagrams to aid application design based on BPMN.