Auryc vs. Countly

The session recording tool in Auryc is one of its most
useful features, as it allows you to filter by particular time frames and
traits to find people who participated in a design experiment and see how they
interact with new content.

It's worth noting that Auryc's funnel analysis makes it easy
and clear for stakeholders to see where conversion rates are falling.

We can also quickly design pop-up exit questionnaires and
collect your own data.

Incentivized

Whether you're planning to include it into a website or a mobile application, this arrangement is simple to implement. The best feature has to be its superb "division," which allows you to delve deeper into your data without using SQL-like queries. On Ubuntu, the free "group version" can act organically aided.

Incentivized

• Heat mapping.
• User Flows.
• Video Recording.

Incentivized

• Open-source and Self-hosted - Countly can be completely self-hosted, which makes it really easy to offset costs of a competing service like Segment or Mixpanel for early-stage companies.
• A large number of SDKs and platform support - Countly provides fairly comprehensive support for mobile applications and general tracking. As a result, it's pretty easy to create comprehensive tracking of events for any company.
• Custom queries, access to data - You have instant access to data and extensive customizability which makes this platform fairly easy to use for any purpose of user and market tracking.

Incentivized

• Nothing that I dislike in specific.
• However, it would be nice to have better and exhaustive support guides/user manuals to help create custom reports and use the tool more effecively.
• The dashboard could be slightly better as too much data can be overwhelming at times.

Incentivized

• No specific thing in mind. All is good except sometimes the customer service lags a little when you have problems setting up the tool.

Incentivized

Countly practically does everything you need it to do. However, it can have challenges of its own sometimes.

Incentivized

Auryc has a lot more features than Hotjar. The screen recordings have been great which Hotjar didn't have. Hotjar didn't track the site speed spikes or the NPS score.

Incentivized

Countly have two main elements that make it the better option. First is open sourced so you can edit with code new options and new events, also you can use a variety of plugins depending of the necessities of the users and the objectives of every analysis. The second characteristic is that is very easy to use and even if is open source and the code could seem complex everything is very intuitive.

Incentivized

• We have options for backtracking events if we don't configure tracking for a particular event.
• It's great for recording sessions and seeing how users interact with the website.
• Through funnel views, stakeholders can see churn and optimization goals.

Incentivized

• Allowed me to understand my customer on a deeper level
• Allowed me to tweak my content and sales pages
• Allowed me to better understand my target market.

Incentivized