Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro vs. PlanSwift, by ConstructConnect

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro (formerly BIM360) is a construction software for project managers, site managers, and Building Information Modelling (BIM) managers. It is designed to connect the office and site components of construction, providing cloud-based access to plans and models.
$480
per user/per year
PlanSwift, by ConstructConnect
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
PlanSwift is a quantity takeoff software for construction estimating. It features a drag-and-drop interface and automatically calculates material and labor estimations in exportable formats. PlanSwift was acquired by ConstructConnect in the middle of 2018.
$1,595
per installation
Pricing
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProPlanSwift, by ConstructConnect
Editions & Modules
Autodesk Bim 360
$480.00
per user/per year
Standard
$1,595
per installation
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProPlanSwift, by ConstructConnect
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProPlanSwift, by ConstructConnect
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProPlanSwift, by ConstructConnect
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
8.4
2 Ratings
4% above category average
PlanSwift, by ConstructConnect
-
Ratings
Dashboards8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Data exportability8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Construction Project & Field Management
Comparison of Construction Project & Field Management features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
8.4
11 Ratings
12% above category average
PlanSwift, by ConstructConnect
-
Ratings
Plan distribution & viewing8.011 Ratings00 Ratings
Plan markups & sharing8.511 Ratings00 Ratings
Issue tracking & punchlists8.010 Ratings00 Ratings
Photo documentation8.010 Ratings00 Ratings
Jobsite reports8.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Document sharing8.510 Ratings00 Ratings
RFI tools9.09 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration & approvals9.010 Ratings00 Ratings
As-built drawings8.58 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app7.010 Ratings00 Ratings
Submittal design and management8.08 Ratings00 Ratings
Checklists8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Meeting Minutes9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Specifications8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Change orders9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Estimating
Comparison of Estimating features of Product A and Product B
Autodesk BIM Collaborate Pro
8.0
1 Ratings
2% below category average
PlanSwift, by ConstructConnect
-
Ratings
Takeoff tools8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Job costing8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost databases8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost calculator8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Bid creation8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProPlanSwift, by ConstructConnect
Small Businesses
FollowUp CRM
FollowUp CRM
Score 9.5 out of 10
Procore
Procore
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Revit
Revit
Score 8.9 out of 10
Procore
Procore
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Revit
Revit
Score 8.9 out of 10
Bluebeam
Bluebeam
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProPlanSwift, by ConstructConnect
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(11 ratings)
9.9
(9 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
6.9
(2 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Autodesk BIM Collaborate ProPlanSwift, by ConstructConnect
Likelihood to Recommend
Autodesk
Autodesk Bim 360 is well suited to the majority of construction projects in my opinion. On the construction side I could see how the straightforward nature of the platform would be well liked. The new update with the widgets is a great touch and allows for ease of site visits by showcasing good to know info like project location on a map and the local weather. You can also customize the "widgets" as you see fit to add more information if necessary to the home screen. From my experience as a LEED consultant, Bim 360 does not differ much from other platforms used for submittal review like Procore. It is easy enough to search for what you want but searches do take a while and you need to move the cursor over every time you search and do not find what you're looking for, which seems very unnecessary. Overall it is fine for reviewing documentation but isn't anything extraordinary.
Read full review
ConstructConnect
I use PlanSwift for all my projects - it has just cut my time by a major percentage when it comes to quantifying a blueprint. At times there are funky areas, which are just hard to calculate on paper. It also has a great tool for scaling according to the dimensions, so if a drawing is missing a scale, you can always allot a scale by giving directions and then marking the points. I use this tool to check the scale as well - sometimes the drawings say something but the scale if off and you are left with an incorrect take-off. The dimension tool is a good way to check that. We don't use it much for pricing purposes though, we have found other software which are more robust when it comes to estimation, but we can see using PlanSwift for pricing sometime in the future.
Read full review
Pros
Autodesk
  • Live updates between design teams. This keeps the team up to date for quicker design and frees up personnel from having to do file transfers.
  • The cloud-based platform gives your company a little bit of a break on computer requirements.
  • Allows multiple offices and/or cloud-based consultants to collaborate on a design as if they are one office or one company.
Read full review
ConstructConnect
  • Easy to use and intuitive.
  • Accurate data to use for projects, allowing for a central hub for all teams to work from.
  • It's a central stop from take off and plan review all the way to plugging numbers into our estimating.
  • The ability to link through SharePoint, which always access from any user and location.
Read full review
Cons
Autodesk
  • Bim360 is extremely unintuitive and frequently confusing to end users.
  • There are multiple avenues of sharing and collaboration for models and information. The advantages/disadvantages of each and how to perform even the most basic of tasks requires extensive training and mentoring for even the most advanced of users.
  • There are many enormous limitations and constraints to BIM 360 that are not immediately obvious and even contrary to published marketing materials and even product naming.
  • Development cycles of the product are seemingly monthly, but incredibly minor. This makes the desperately-needed and glaringly obvious massive usability, capability, and performance improvements into deal-breakers and hair pulling events. Change cannot come fast enough.
  • There are no integrations into Microsoft's Azure AD SSO or other 3rd party SSOs available for SMBs. This makes the provided MFA a huge headache for all SMBs.
  • There are no integrations into the Microsoft 365 ecosystem for SharePoint/OneDrive or Outlook. This is desperately needed for most organizations using Bim360.
Read full review
ConstructConnect
  • Submittals are not user friendly in PlanGrid. In fact, this is the one feature we would like to see improved.
  • Billing is based on how many users you have. It would be very nice if they would do it based on revenue or other factors such as other programs do.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
ConstructConnect
It's become the go to program for our takeoffs. We have tried others but this is the simplest.
Read full review
Usability
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
ConstructConnect
Plan Swift is a user friendly program that makes takeoffs easy to perform. Not a whole lot of knowledge or skill is required.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
ConstructConnect
Never had an issue
Read full review
Performance
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
ConstructConnect
Plan Swift is only as fast as your computer system and internet
Read full review
Support Rating
Autodesk
AutoDesk support is slow and if you are not an enterprise customer they will likely tell you to go to forums and post for help pushing the support on the high-level end-users (some of which are AutoDesk employees). I haven't actually had issues requiring support with docs altough there are some features I wish it had
Read full review
ConstructConnect
I have called once needing support. I was asking about the "compare" tool to compare different versions. They told be about their desktop app and I downloaded. They answered quickly, you could understand them, and they took care of my question
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
ConstructConnect
just know what use you want to get out of it. In our case it was just to do area take offs.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Autodesk
The saving in reduced field changes/mistakes quickly paid for the license plus some. The software allows for easy data collection, especially at project completion for field software by checklist creation. Furthermore, the internal punch-list tracking, tracking completion lists and punch lists created for us by others is optimal compared to the competition. We chose Bim360 over other options due to its ability to import out of other software programs directly into the system, adding reports in one location and then distributing it to subcontractors and internally from there to fix deficiencies. It does the tracking, importing, markups of pictures and document viewing well and fulfills our needs.
Read full review
ConstructConnect
Bluebeam is amazing and can accomplish any take-off needs, but you will spend much more time creating your conditions and take off items. It is not as user-friendly as PlanSwift. OST (On screen takeoff). This product is by far better than PlanSwift, as it is amazingly easy to use. However, it is much more expensive. Cloud-based takeoff software -- this kind of software is difficult for me to use because of how slow the pages load and navigate. It's hard to beat that from PlanSwift or OST.
Read full review
Scalability
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
ConstructConnect
Several of our departments can use the take off feature to assist them in their job responsibilities.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Autodesk
  • Positively we use for all safety items, so its potential to save money is really something cannot be quantified. It has helped document trends, big items leading trends and odd ball cases which overall helps perfecting process to eliminate those trends and save time.
  • Negative impact is we need to pay for another program to handle budget, submittals and bidding so we are paying for two systems and paying for all employees to learn each system and possible make errors since there are differences in the systems.
Read full review
ConstructConnect
  • The estimators' productivity is greatly increased, I do takeoffs in less than half the time with more accuracy and detail captured.
  • Easy sharing of what was taken off, I'm able to ensure everything is captured.
Read full review
ScreenShots