Autodesk CFD vs. Netgate TNSR

We use a lot of Autodesk software and of course Autodesk CFD package. Integration with Inventor is pretty good. Models can be open right away in Autodesk CFD. The software saved lots of time in testing some glass units so we didn't need to perform too many real tests. Also, we used the software to improve our designs.

Incentivized

Netgate TNSR would be most suitable if you are in need of fast application traffic and quick packet processing. What I like most about Netgate TNSR is that the network interfaces no longer get cut in half or encrypted traffic hauled so you are able to work on your projects swiftly on stable connections. You will however have to make time to familiarize with the command line interface for quick commands.

Incentivized

• Analyze heat transfer
• thermal analysis
• helps minimizing prototyping parts

Incentivized

• Has very fast connection setups
• I've never experienced packet processing latencies while using the software.
• It's easy to monitor the routers via SNMP

Incentivized

• more options in the software
• better reports
• better interface

Incentivized

• Took me a while before I completely got a hold of the complex command line interface.

Incentivized

We chose Autodesk CFD as the integration within Autodesk products is great. Also it's price was another element in choosing it. We really like the interface as it's very similar with Inventor and other Autodesk solutions. The mesh capabilities are very powerful and easy to be refined. Reports provided are easily created

Incentivized

• definitely saved money in our design process
• improved existing 3D models

Incentivized

• We deploy the third party hardware on AWS with great flexibility
• Fast packet processing
• Superb router performance without needing ASICs.

Incentivized