Autodesk ShotGrid vs. Miro

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ShotGrid
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
ShotGrid is a production management and review toolset for VFX, animation, and games teams. ShotGrid is equipped to handle creative production tracking needs, supporting teams from large to smaller studios.
$45
per month per user
Miro
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Miro provides a visual workspace for innovation, where distributed teams can build the future together. MIro counts more than 80 million users, who improve product development, speed up time to market, and ensure that new products deliver on customer needs.
$10
per month per user
Pricing
Autodesk ShotGridMiro
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
1. Free - To discover what Miro can do. Always free
$0
2. Starter - Unlimited and private boards with essential features
$8
per month (billed annually) per user
3. Business - Scales collaboration with advanced features and security
$16
per month (billed annually) per user
4. Enterprise - For work across the entire organization, with support, security and control, to scale
contact sales
annual billing per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ShotGridMiro
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsMonthly billing also available at $10 per month for the Starter plan, or $20 for the Business plan.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Autodesk ShotGridMiro
Considered Both Products
ShotGrid

No answer on this topic

Miro
Chose Miro
Canva, while they do offer flowcharting, is mostly for graphic design for people who are not graphic designers. Miro makes it much easier to make internal documentation and references and has far more robust social features for real-time collaboration. If I were making …
Chose Miro
Miro fell short for our UX and Prototyping needs, but for forms of task tracking, schedules, dailies, art reviews, and feedback, it has been a GREAT space. We tried Shotgun for a bit, but this workflow is much more unique and provides lots of info in a quick look. It is less …
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Autodesk ShotGridMiro
Small Businesses
Frame.io
Frame.io
Score 9.0 out of 10
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Lucid Visual Collaboration Suite
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Autodesk ShotGridMiro
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(5221 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.3
(129 ratings)
Usability
5.0
(1 ratings)
8.5
(88 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(11 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(10 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.4
(36 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.8
(4 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.8
(3475 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(5 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(3810 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(10 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
8.4
(3 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
6.4
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Autodesk ShotGridMiro
Likelihood to Recommend
Autodesk
ShotGrid seems to be well suited for a video team for reviews and project tracking. It may not be well suited for Project managers who need to see the bigger picture of the project.
Read full review
Miro
I recommend Miro all the time. I have used it during COVID to run research workshops and I use it in all my classes to help students create representations that support their design projects. It allows remote participation, making it easier for students to collaborate. The rating is not a 10 since there are a few annoyances, but it is one of the best pieces of software I've encountered in the last five years.
Read full review
Pros
Autodesk
  • Uploads videos efficiently
  • allows annotation within the video
  • setting custom filters
  • creating Gantt chart with inputs from each editor and animator
  • adding versions to shot/asset
  • adding assets to a shot
Read full review
Miro
  • Collaboration (sticky dot voting / comments / sticky notes / voting sessions / feedback)
  • Easy to use design capabilities (structuring workshops and exercises)
  • Wide range of modularity (can embed other app's API in the board, can easily inject templates from the miroverse)
  • Very clear and easy to grasp UI
Read full review
Cons
Autodesk
  • Ordering comments made by different people by timecode/frame number, instead by the time and date the comment was made
  • Being able to move an uploaded video from shots to assets and vice versa. Right now we have to re-upload but lose any comments made already if they were in the wrong place
  • Custom filters are great but they could get a little confusing with all the options. Might help with guidelines or a place we could ask what we want and someone could answer with the best way to achieve those specific filters we want
Read full review
Miro
  • I wish there was a way to center and align everything in a section. When I'm in my files on my Mac, I can click "clean up," and all the icons will center themselves. It would be great if I had a bunch of sticky notes all clustered together.
  • The tables are not super user-friendly. I wish there was an easier way to include tables or spreadsheet-like tools.
  • When I connect two boxes with a line, it's pretty rigid in how it connects the line. This is nitpicky, but I wish I could dictate where the line starts and ends between the two boxes. Otherwise,e the lines kind of zig-zag up and down multiple boxes.
  • I know you guys just updated the homepage, but something about it still feels a little noisy. I think the sidebar just might be too big. We pretty much only create blank boards, so I wish we could get rid of all the different options at the top (flowchart, mind map, etc.)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Autodesk
For education, we can't see ourselves using anything else that comes at a cost
Read full review
Miro
There is no other tool like Miro for process Mapping in particular. I've tried PowerPoint, Word, and other programs, but when collaborating virtually on how to improve a process, Miro has all of the tools and more to enable successful mapping. The colors, different types of shapes and text books, along with the ability to integrate different documents and other functionality, make it ideal for this purpose. In a virtual world, it's a must-have.
Read full review
Usability
Autodesk
It's UI/UX is very robust. There's a lot of functionality but it's not very intuitive or intuitive. I spend time with new hires and contractors to overview ShotGrid for a day and revisit after a week or two. Questions always arise down the line
Read full review
Miro
It's pretty easy to use. My gripes are with some small idiosyncrasies with selection behavior with objects and editing text. When I move an object, it automatically de-selects it when I am not done with it. I have to click to select again. Text control is challenging and could be improved. It could use a little more styling capability. It's also weird that it behaves differently in a shape then when using the text tool.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Miro
I only give a 9/10 because of the speed at which it loads. I have never experienced issues with Miro logging me out early, or some other technical issue causing the program to crash, or even it just loading in perpetuity without ever actually coming up (unlike other programs such as SFDC). It take a minute for all of my boards to come up after I click on it in my favorites, but besides that, it's all good.
Read full review
Performance
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Miro
I took the loading quickly to be related to availability which I commented on before, so ditto with those comment on load time here. Although to reemphasize, Miro doesn't crash or just refuse to load like some other programs. The weak point of Miro for me is integration of files like Word, Excel, or PowerPoint (especially the later two). When you embed these, it gets slow, and complicated to bring them up while you're in the application.
Read full review
Support Rating
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Miro
The support staff at Miro are fantastic. Whenever I have had an issue, they have been timely and helpful with their response. They are also very knowledgeable and go out of their way to not only help, but offer proactive training sessions on different topics and new functionality so everyone can try it out.
Read full review
Online Training
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Miro
There was a series of webinars which Miro hosted with our organization that went over the basics, then progressively became more advanced with additional sections. The instructors were knowledgeable, and provided examples throughout the sessions, as well as answered peoples' questions. There was ample time and experience on the calls to cover a range of topics. The instructors were also very friendly and sociable, as well as honest. Of course Miro isn't a "God-tool" that does absolutely everything, but the instructors were aware and emphasized the strengths where Miro had them and sincerely accepted feedback.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Miro
The user-friendly nature of Miro makes it very easy to pick up and play, without going through a serious of sign-up or tutorial areas. It's possible to share to 'unverified' users whilst letting them in, but constantly discovering new and exciting features when using it.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Autodesk
Wipster had limitations on video uploads, which was a major drawback. One thing we liked with Wipster was how we can see comments made in order on the timeline while watching the video.
Read full review
Miro
These other products' collaborative workspaces and integration are much more limited, tangential, and less enduring. Miro is much more robust yet also simplified, making it easy to do very simple things and then progress to meet more complex demands. The company cultivates a great and interactive community in Miro, which increases the learning, experience, and resources for everyone.
Read full review
Scalability
Autodesk
No answers on this topic
Miro
Miro is great for scaling. In every department and subdivision across my entire organization, there is someone using it. From Sales to marketing, to manufacturing and operations; and even in legal and finance, there isn't a process or a department that is not using Miro, and if they aren't, they're missing out! Even at the highest to the lowest levels of the organization, it is essential for virtual collaboration.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Autodesk
  • We spend less time going back and forth with different stakeholders on shots and assets
  • We don't have to pay services that only provided trial versions
  • There is unlimited video uploading which was not the case with wiz
Read full review
Miro
  • Miro saves me at least 20% effort when planning in the early stages. I'm not bogged down with filling out each field and can easily form and modify initiatives as they come up.
  • It has also reduced our quarterly planning days to 1 day rather than 2 when using Jira.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Miro Screenshots

Screenshot of Miro's design sprint templates, used to solve big challenges, create new products or improve existing ones.Screenshot of the Sprint Planning features in Miro, that assists Development Teams in creating a transparent understanding of what can be built and how. Users can run sprints and turn a team into creative and active participants. Today, many organizations use Agile tools to manage software development and other non-IT projects.Screenshot of the PI Planning Template that brings teams toward one vision of what stories to develop. Used to manage a backlog, increase productivity, and build the foundation for a successful PI Planning event. Miro’s PI Planning Template helps to get an overview of any PI Planning event, with step-by-step frames to guide the process.Screenshot of diagrams, concept maps, and system mapping templates used to communicate complex flows and create a shared understanding. Users can check off all the essential steps of the diagramming process and gain a complete overview of operations with Miro's diagramming templates collection.