Top Rated
384 Ratings
4 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.2 out of 100
Top Rated
384 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.6 out of 100

Attribute Ratings

  • Azure DevOps Services is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

Likelihood to Recommend

8.0

AWS CodeArtifact

80%
1 Rating
8.9

Azure DevOps Services

89%
56 Ratings

Likelihood to Renew

AWS CodeArtifact

N/A
0 Ratings
10.0

Azure DevOps Services

100%
3 Ratings

Usability

AWS CodeArtifact

N/A
0 Ratings
7.0

Azure DevOps Services

70%
5 Ratings

Support Rating

AWS CodeArtifact

N/A
0 Ratings
8.2

Azure DevOps Services

82%
20 Ratings

Implementation Rating

AWS CodeArtifact

N/A
0 Ratings
10.0

Azure DevOps Services

100%
2 Ratings

Likelihood to Recommend

Amazon AWS

We have a small team with limited resources and it worked well for us. Hence I can conclude that AWS Code Artifact are well suited for organizations which have limited resources in terms of hardware and access to administrators for setting up artifact repository in-house. AWS Code Artifact is also suited particularly well for organization(s) which are already using AWS Services/Infrastructure (eg. EC2) . It works quite well with existing AWS services and completes the gap which existed in AWS offering for quite some time. Organizations can move their entire DevOps toolchain and infrastructure to Amazon. It is less appropriate for organization(s) which rely on artifacts like Debian, C/C++, Go etc as AWS does not support those fully.
Read full review

Microsoft

[Azure DevOps Services (formerly VSTS)] is well suited for agile teams. It is a digital kanban for teams to access anywhere at any time. Especially during covid when most companies are still remote, it allows teams to fully perform and still be functional in operating within an agile methodology. It also gives visibility to teams capacity.
Read full review

Pros

Amazon AWS

  • Code Artifact is a cloud based artifact repository so there is no installation required.
  • Code Artifact comes with out of the box security. Using RBAC and encryption
  • Total cost of usage is less than setting up in-house servers
  • It is accessible from any where.. so no additional network setup is required.
Read full review

Microsoft

  • Flexible Requirements Hierarchy Management: AZDO makes it easy to track items such as features or epics as a flat list, or as a hierarchy in which you can track the parent-child relationship.
  • Fast Data Entry: AZDO was designed to facilitate quick data entry to capture work items quickly, while still enabling detailed capture of acceptance criteria and item properties.
  • Excel Integration: AZDO stands out for its integration with MS Excel, which enables quick updates for bulk items.
Read full review

Cons

Amazon AWS

  • CodeArtifact does not support packages like debian. It will be nice to see them support that.
  • Does not provide security scanning of the packages
  • Lacks support for third party CI/CD toolchain like Jenkins
Read full review

Microsoft

  • Column sorting when in filtered states.
  • A way to show cross-team dependencies.
  • A customized "From" field for notifications. Sometimes when a mail comes from Azure DevOps the teams do not realize that I am sending it
  • A way to do online poker that doesn't require a plug-in.
Read full review

Pricing Details

AWS CodeArtifact

Starting Price

Editions & Modules

AWS CodeArtifact editions and modules pricing
EditionModules

Footnotes

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    Azure DevOps Services

    Starting Price

    $2 per GB (first 2GB free)

    Editions & Modules

    Azure DevOps Services editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules
    Basic Plan$61
    Basic + Test Plan$522
    Azure Artifacts$23
    Azure Pipelines - Microsoft Hosted$404
    Azure Pipelines - Self-Hosted$155

    Footnotes

    1. per user per month (first 5 users free)
    2. per user per month
    3. per GB (first 2GB free)
    4. per parallel job (1,800 minutes free with 1 free parallel job)
    5. per extra parallel job (1 free parallel job with unlimited minutes)

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    Likelihood to Renew

    Amazon AWS

    No answers on this topic

    Microsoft

    I don't think our organization will stray from using VSTS/TFS as we are now looking to upgrade to the 2012 version. Since our business is software development and we want to meet the requirements of CMMI to deliver consistent and high quality software, this SDLC management tool is here to stay. In addition, our company uses a lot of Microsoft products, such as Office 365, Asp.net, etc, and since VSTS/TFS has proved itself invaluable to our own processes and is within the Microsoft family of products, we will continue to use VSTS/TFS for a long, long time.
    Read full review

    Usability

    Amazon AWS

    No answers on this topic

    Microsoft

    Azure DevOps is a powerful, complex cloud application. As such there are a number of things it does great and something where there is room for improvement. One of those areas would be in usability. In my opinion it relies too much on search. There is no easy way to view all projects or to group them in a logical way. You need to search for everything.
    Read full review

    Support Rating

    Amazon AWS

    No answers on this topic

    Microsoft

    When we've had issues, both Microsoft support and the user community have been very responsive. DevOps has an active developer community and frankly, you can find most of your questions already asked and answered there. Microsoft also does a better job than most software vendors I've worked with creating detailed and frequently updated documentation.
    Read full review

    Implementation Rating

    Amazon AWS

    No answers on this topic

    Microsoft

    Was not part of the process.
    Read full review

    Alternatives Considered

    Amazon AWS

    AWS CodeArtifact is an excellent choice for organization(s) which are looking to move their infrastructure and devops toolchain to Amazon. It is very useful for teams/organizations on limited budget or do not want to take on infrastructure and maintenance costs associated with the artifact repository. Other software solutions require resources for setting up and need ongoing maintenance.
    Read full review

    Microsoft

    Azure DevOps is much easier to implement and use on a daily basis than VersionOne. This is based on end-user feedback and my personal experience as well. ADO has more features and seems to get updated more frequently than VersionOne as well. VersionOne is less expensive overall than ADO, but our company prefers to use ADO because it has a lot more benefits.
    Read full review

    Return on Investment

    Amazon AWS

    • Overall CodeArtifact has positive ROI on the our team. We had limited budget for procurement of server/administrators. With CodeArtifact we were able to get some savings.
    • We were able to deliver faster hence customers were quite happy. That led to customer satisfaction
    • We didnt have to invest on maintaining network infrastructure/uptime and security. That saved us quite a bit of hassle and funds.
    Read full review

    Microsoft

    • It provides a great IDE to make things easier, clear, and compact. It has always been a positive ROI
    • It's worth the money. I don't think any other software could replace the VS. It has helped us a lot to making things ready on time
    • The only thing I dislike is that it takes a lot of memory space when in an idle state
    Read full review

    Add comparison