MailGate SC vs. N-able Mail Assure

MailGate is well suited for organizations that have sensitive information with the need to securely transport via email, it is less appropriate for larger organizations as the overhead for administrators becomes more complex

Incentivized

SolarWinds Mail Assure is well suited to medium and large sized organizations that need a configurable and flexible mail filter. It is likely to not be appropriate for marketing firms that want a set it and forget it sort of filter that needs no adjustment.

Incentivized

• Ability to alert a variety of statuses to administrators via email
• Shows health status of the appliance to ensure proper functionality

Incentivized

• Spam filtering
• Adaptive learning for security

Incentivized

• External storage configuration is complex to set up
• Customer support is average, can be slow depending on the type of issue or request

Incentivized

• SMTP scanning trips some spam filters.
• Releasing a quarantined spam email often requires admin intervention.
• Console access is cumbersome for end users.

Incentivized

The support has been rock solid, easy to communicate with, and highly knowledgable.

Incentivized

MailGate works well with administrative control and ease of use for setting up TLS connectivity between clients

Incentivized

We have used a few mail security options, including SpamStopsHere. Mail Assure is easier to manage and adapts as it learns the email traffic and patterns that come into the company. We use most of the SolarWinds suite, including MSPManager, N-central, Passportal, and Endpoint Security. We have been happy with their products and they are always quick to respond to their support tickets.

Incentivized

• MailGate has allowed the organization to accept more clients with their knowledge of our ability to securely send emails

Incentivized

• It cut down on the amount of spam we get.
• It can differentiate a email box from an alias attached so it must be specified to keep from being billed.

Incentivized