Azure DevOps Services
Top Rated
370 Ratings
IBM Cloud Functions
54 Ratings

Azure DevOps Services

Top Rated
370 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.7 out of 100

Based on 370 reviews and ratings

IBM Cloud Functions

54 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 6.6 out of 100

Based on 54 reviews and ratings

Feature Set Ratings

    Platform-as-a-Service

    Azure DevOps Services

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    4.0

    IBM Cloud Functions

    40%
    IBM Cloud Functions ranks higher in 1/1 features
    IBM Cloud Functions ranks higher in 1/1 features

    Scalability

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    4.0
    40%
    7 Ratings

    Attribute Ratings

    • Azure DevOps Services is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

    Likelihood to Recommend

    8.8

    Azure DevOps Services

    88%
    56 Ratings
    3.0

    IBM Cloud Functions

    30%
    7 Ratings

    Likelihood to Renew

    10.0

    Azure DevOps Services

    100%
    3 Ratings

    IBM Cloud Functions

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Usability

    7.1

    Azure DevOps Services

    71%
    5 Ratings

    IBM Cloud Functions

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Support Rating

    8.4

    Azure DevOps Services

    84%
    20 Ratings

    IBM Cloud Functions

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Implementation Rating

    10.0

    Azure DevOps Services

    100%
    2 Ratings

    IBM Cloud Functions

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Likelihood to Recommend

    Azure DevOps Services

    [Azure DevOps Services (formerly VSTS)] is well suited for agile teams. It is a digital kanban for teams to access anywhere at any time. Especially during covid when most companies are still remote, it allows teams to fully perform and still be functional in operating within an agile methodology. It also gives visibility to teams capacity.

    Read full review

    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Verified User
    View all 56 answers on this topic

    IBM Cloud Functions

    IBM Cloud Functions [is] not the worse product on the IBM cloud. I decided to write this review as I thought it would be balanced. I would still use functions to set up a serverless architecture where execution time is pretty quick and the code is relatively simple.I wouldn't use IBM Cloud Functions for async calls obviously, as costs could be higher. The functions documentation is lacking in terms of CI/CD, and there are unexplainable errors occurring - like the network connection that I mentioned. So I wouldn't just rely on IBM Cloud Functions too much for the entire system, but make sure it's diversified.

    Read full review

    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Verified User
    View all 7 answers on this topic

    Pros

    Azure DevOps Services

    • Flexible Requirements Hierarchy Management: AZDO makes it easy to track items such as features or epics as a flat list, or as a hierarchy in which you can track the parent-child relationship.
    • Fast Data Entry: AZDO was designed to facilitate quick data entry to capture work items quickly, while still enabling detailed capture of acceptance criteria and item properties.
    • Excel Integration: AZDO stands out for its integration with MS Excel, which enables quick updates for bulk items.

    Read full review

    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Verified User
    View all 56 answers on this topic

    IBM Cloud Functions

    • Great substitute for a simple API calls to run non-complicated code.
    • Easy way to run Python/Java/Javascript to get something done.
    • File validation.

    Read full review

    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Verified User
    View all 7 answers on this topic

    Cons

    Azure DevOps Services

    • Column sorting when in filtered states.
    • A way to show cross-team dependencies.
    • A customized "From" field for notifications. Sometimes when a mail comes from Azure DevOps the teams do not realize that I am sending it
    • A way to do online poker that doesn't require a plug-in.

    Read full review

    Amy Liston | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Amy Liston
    View all 56 answers on this topic

    IBM Cloud Functions

    • Billing can be a hassle, not the most responsive customer service/support team
    • Handles & executes most functionalities, but other platforms offer more scalability if you're seeking consistent and stable growth

    Read full review

    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Verified User
    View all 7 answers on this topic

    Pricing Details

    Azure DevOps Services

    General

    Free Trial
    —
    Free/Freemium Version
    —
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    —
    Entry-level set up fee?
    No

    Starting Price

    $2 per GB (first 2GB free)

    Azure DevOps Services Editions & Modules

    Edition
    Basic Plan$61
    Basic + Test Plan$522
    Azure Artifacts$23
    Azure Pipelines - Microsoft Hosted$404
    Azure Pipelines - Self-Hosted$155
    1. per user per month (first 5 users free)
    2. per user per month
    3. per GB (first 2GB free)
    4. per parallel job (1,800 minutes free with 1 free parallel job)
    5. per extra parallel job (1 free parallel job with unlimited minutes)
    Additional Pricing Details
    —

    IBM Cloud Functions

    General

    Free Trial
    —
    Free/Freemium Version
    —
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    —
    Entry-level set up fee?
    No

    Starting Price

    $0

    IBM Cloud Functions Editions & Modules

    Edition
    Basic Cloud Functions Rate$0.000171
    API Gateway RateFree
    1. per second of execution
    2. none
    Additional Pricing Details
    —

    Likelihood to Renew

    Azure DevOps Services

    Azure DevOps Services 10.0
    Based on 3 answers
    I don't think our organization will stray from using VSTS/TFS as we are now looking to upgrade to the 2012 version. Since our business is software development and we want to meet the requirements of CMMI to deliver consistent and high quality software, this SDLC management tool is here to stay. In addition, our company uses a lot of Microsoft products, such as Office 365, Asp.net, etc, and since VSTS/TFS has proved itself invaluable to our own processes and is within the Microsoft family of products, we will continue to use VSTS/TFS for a long, long time.

    Read full review

    Raylene Wall, PMP | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Raylene Wall, PMP
    View all 3 answers on this topic

    IBM Cloud Functions

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Usability

    Azure DevOps Services

    Azure DevOps Services 7.1
    Based on 5 answers
    Azure DevOps is a powerful, complex cloud application. As such there are a number of things it does great and something where there is room for improvement. One of those areas would be in usability. In my opinion it relies too much on search. There is no easy way to view all projects or to group them in a logical way. You need to search for everything.

    Read full review

    Kyle Kochtan | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Kyle Kochtan
    View all 5 answers on this topic

    IBM Cloud Functions

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Support Rating

    Azure DevOps Services

    Azure DevOps Services 8.4
    Based on 20 answers
    When we've had issues, both Microsoft support and the user community have been very responsive. DevOps has an active developer community and frankly, you can find most of your questions already asked and answered there. Microsoft also does a better job than most software vendors I've worked with creating detailed and frequently updated documentation.

    Read full review

    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Verified User
    View all 20 answers on this topic

    IBM Cloud Functions

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Implementation Rating

    Azure DevOps Services

    Azure DevOps Services 10.0
    Based on 2 answers
    Was not part of the process.

    Read full review

    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Verified User
    View all 2 answers on this topic

    IBM Cloud Functions

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Alternatives Considered

    Azure DevOps Services

    Azure DevOps is much easier to implement and use on a daily basis than VersionOne. This is based on end-user feedback and my personal experience as well. ADO has more features and seems to get updated more frequently than VersionOne as well. VersionOne is less expensive overall than ADO, but our company prefers to use ADO because it has a lot more benefits.

    Read full review

    Mark McCully | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Mark McCully
    View all 56 answers on this topic

    IBM Cloud Functions

    • ICF is a lightweight service and does not require runtime configurations
    • Scalable on demand and hence there is no need to pay for runtime costs

    Read full review

    Badheka, Amit | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Badheka, Amit
    View all 7 answers on this topic

    Return on Investment

    Azure DevOps Services

    • It provides a great IDE to make things easier, clear, and compact. It has always been a positive ROI
    • It's worth the money. I don't think any other software could replace the VS. It has helped us a lot to making things ready on time
    • The only thing I dislike is that it takes a lot of memory space when in an idle state

    Read full review

    AMANDEEP KUNDRAO | TrustRadius Reviewer
    AMANDEEP KUNDRAO
    View all 56 answers on this topic

    IBM Cloud Functions

    • It directly affected our expenses since we do not need to deploy and maintain a set of separate applications.
    • It allowed us to pay for only the amount of time cloud functions run.
    • It saved on maintenance and monitoring of the applications it replaced.

    Read full review

    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Verified User
    View all 7 answers on this topic

    Add comparison