Azure Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Defense Orchestrator

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Azure Firewall Manager
Score 8.2 out of 10
N/A
Azure Firewall Manager provides central network security policy and route management for globally distributed, software-defined perimeters. It offers centralized configuration and management of multiple Azure Firewall instances, across Azure regions and subscriptions.
$100
per policy per region
Cisco Defense Orchestrator
Score 9.6 out of 10
N/A
Cisco Defense Orchestrator helps the user consistently manage policies across Cisco security products. It is a cloud-based application that cuts through complexity to save time and keep your organization protected against the latest threats.N/A
Pricing
Azure Firewall ManagerCisco Defense Orchestrator
Editions & Modules
Azure Firewall Manager Integrations
$0.40
per deployment hour
Azure Firewall Manager
$100
per policy per region
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Azure Firewall ManagerCisco Defense Orchestrator
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Azure Firewall ManagerCisco Defense Orchestrator
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Azure Firewall ManagerCisco Defense Orchestrator
Firewall Security Management
Comparison of Firewall Security Management features of Product A and Product B
Azure Firewall Manager
7.2
3 Ratings
12% below category average
Cisco Defense Orchestrator
7.6
3 Ratings
7% below category average
Policy planning and rule management7.03 Ratings9.13 Ratings
Automated Policy Orchestration8.52 Ratings7.73 Ratings
Device Discovery6.33 Ratings7.53 Ratings
Policy Compliance Auditing7.73 Ratings7.73 Ratings
Attack Path Simulation Testing8.03 Ratings5.42 Ratings
Anomalous Event or Behavior Deviation7.33 Ratings7.02 Ratings
Vulnerability Scans6.03 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Firewall Rule Cleanup7.03 Ratings7.73 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Azure Firewall ManagerCisco Defense Orchestrator
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Palo Alto Panorama
Palo Alto Panorama
Score 8.5 out of 10
Palo Alto Panorama
Palo Alto Panorama
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Palo Alto Panorama
Palo Alto Panorama
Score 8.5 out of 10
Palo Alto Panorama
Palo Alto Panorama
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Azure Firewall ManagerCisco Defense Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend
8.3
(3 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Azure Firewall ManagerCisco Defense Orchestrator
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
Azure Firewall manager is best suited where you have multiple firewalls, and we can manage it centrally in one dashboard. Less appropriate for small companies as it is a bit expensive.
Read full review
Cisco
Cisco Defense Orchestrator is an ideal software to easily manage firewalls at the enterprise level, as well as to implement security policies that allow the corporate infrastructure to remain free of threats that can put at risk all the devices that are handled on a daily basis. For example, it is ideal for preventing network intrusions, since it has the ability to block malware and any suspicious activity. In addition, the fact that it is based on a single console provides the benefit of keeping all devices under view and thus preventing any threat in the simplest way.
Read full review
Pros
Microsoft
  • Security
  • Firewall
  • Traffic
Read full review
Cisco
  • Upgrade OS
  • Manage changes at scale
  • Group like configurations
  • Clone configs for other firewalls
  • Migrate from on prem to cloud
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Bulk IP address fails, requires you to split it up smaller
  • Firewall Rules dont always have good descriptions
  • No Traffic Splitting
Read full review
Cisco
  • Better templates like pushing config. when a particular firewall checks in with CDO.
  • Compliance checking for configurations would be great. For example: make sure http is shut and https is open.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
I give this score because I believe that Cisco Defense Orchestrator helps our company to be resilient, this is because this software is also focused on offering security resilience at the enterprise level, that is, through its features such as high visibility, acceleration of threat detection and response, simple management, and end-to-end protection. By having it, it is more feasible to avoid disasters or risks in the devices that are handled daily and of course avoid data loss and, given this, be able to recover quickly if something happens.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
I believe that Cisco Defense Orchestrator is available when needed, this solution has allowed the security team to have better productivity thanks to the fact that their workflow is less intense because they can carry out their tasks with the help of this software, in addition to the presence If there is an error, they can be overcome quickly because their support team is efficient.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Cisco
Cisco Defense Orchestrator is a software that is easy to implement, although knowledge is required for it, but if you do not have it, going to its valuable support team is very helpful. If done knowingly, this process can take less than two hours. Having a simple implementation is a valuable feature because it saves time and expense.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
We Selected Azure Firewall Manager because of its reliable service and Security, which they provide across our network architecture.
Read full review
Cisco
We used the on box management platform. This required API usage for automating things. It was not scalable and a lot of features are not there. There are platforms like manage engine, but they are not Cisco FP native and had limitations as well.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • Externally hosted firewall.
  • No cost having on Orem appliance.
  • Cheaper as we only pay for what is use in Azure for it.
Read full review
Cisco
  • Much faster management.
  • Can access firewall without having to go on site if the VPN tunnel is down.
Read full review
ScreenShots