Azure Kubernetes Service (AKS) vs GoDaddy Container-as-a-Service (ElasticHosts, Springs.io), discontinued

• To scale the microservices very easily.
• Easy to set up in CI/CD pipeline.
• It has a good pricing option as well in Azure. Basic works fine.
• Accelerates containerized application development for the developers.

Read full review

• Container hosting, cloud virtualization
• Elastic capacity scaling and pay-per-use billing
• Linux kernel containerization technologies for container isolation and control

Read full review

• Database services monitoring is weak.
• It doesn't possess a good monitoring solution.
• Response times in cloud applications could be faster.

Read full review

• Provide more options at lower costs
• It would be nice to see that expanded out to more distributions. What would be potentially even better though is templates. Some hosts can deploy ready-to-run WordPress/Drupal sites, LAMP instances, ownCloud instances, etc. at the drop of a hat. If Springs could replicate this with their container hosting they’d immediately appeal to a much, much wider audience;

Read full review

• Accelerates the development of a developer.
• To scale the microservices very easily.
• easy to set up in CI/CD.

Read full review

• In the beginning I wasn’t sure what I should set it to for my web server, so I left it. After a while the Average usage area begins showing how much resource the container is demanding and from that more adequate limits can be set.
• Springs is drastically cheaper than running 4 OVH servers, and a little cheaper than running nano instances on AWS.

Read full review