What users are saying about
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring#question3' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>Customer Verified: Read more.</a>
24 Ratings
This review does not include a rating.

Azure Security Center

<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring#question3' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>Customer Verified: Read more.</a>
24 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.6 out of 100
This review does not include a rating.

Attribute Ratings

    Likelihood to Recommend

    8.5

    Azure Security Center

    85%
    12 Ratings

    MobileIron Access

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Likelihood to Recommend

    Microsoft

    When it comes to monitoring Microsoft Security products, Azure Security Center excels. Defender for Endpoints, Defender for Office, Defender for Identity, and Defender for Cloud are all simple to set up and operate. Adding a log server to the mix for additional services may need transforming logs/events from other sources.
    Read full review

    Ivanti

    No answers on this topic

    Pros

    Microsoft

    • Simplicity. The "Security posture" score and Security Alerts give me the key pieces of information at a glance and are nicely centralized.
    • Automation is key for managing the sprawl I had mentioned, and the increased complexity arising from that. The workbooks and workflow automation provide great flexibility in security operations management.
    • Thoroughness. The tradeoff for simplicity is often in thoroughness, but this isn't the case with Defender for Cloud (former Azure Security Center). The security alerts and recommendations actually go into a significant amount of depth while keeping them relevant and meaningful.
    Read full review

    Ivanti

    No answers on this topic

    Cons

    Microsoft

    • You need to spend time learning the platform as it's not a simple 'subscribe and start'.
    • Firewall manager is a bit complicated, it could be simplified and not another portal link.
    • Microsoft could do a better comparison job against this product and others that do similar features/overlap.
    • Recommendations could be more descriptive of the possible outcomes after resolution.
    Read full review

    Ivanti

    No answers on this topic

    Pricing Details

    Azure Security Center

    Starting Price

    $0.2 Per Server Hour

    Editions & Modules

    Azure Security Center editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules
    Virtual Machine$0.201

    Footnotes

    1. Per Server Hour

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    MobileIron Access

    Starting Price

    Editions & Modules

    MobileIron Access editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules

    Footnotes

      Offerings

      Free Trial
      Free/Freemium Version
      Premium Consulting/Integration Services

      Entry-level set up fee?

      No setup fee

      Additional Details

      Alternatives Considered

      Microsoft

      We decided to go with Office 365, instead of G-Suite (what it was at the time) because of my employees' familiarity with the Office set of apps (Word, Excel, etc). As part of O365 comes the Azure Security Center and we've used it ever since - we've not had any issues with it and it's always been able to do whatever we've needed to do for our business (configure our rules, whitelisting, conditional access, adding banners to emails from external senders). It's solid, enterprise-ready software.
      Read full review

      Ivanti

      No answers on this topic

      Return on Investment

      Microsoft

      • Has given confidence to auditors that we are managing our cloud estate in a secure manner
      • Developers have a single pane of glass to verify whether there are any findings for the services they own
      • Helped avoid the manual process of ensuring we are evaluating our environment against the latest compliance framework versions
      • Detections are getting smarter so we haven't had to deal with many false positives
      • Ability to quickly remediate findings
      Read full review

      Ivanti

      No answers on this topic

      Add comparison