B2Win Suite vs. Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
B2Win Suite
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
B2Win Suite is a platform that combines functionality for businesses to optimise their data processing, with a high level presentation and distribution of reports and business documents. It covers areas such as OM/CCM, Query, Reporting, BI, and others.N/A
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes provides end-to-end management visibility and control to manage a Kubernetes environment. Users take control of application modernization program with management capabilities for cluster creation, application lifecycle, and provide security and compliance for all of them across data centers and hybrid cloud environments. Clusters and applications are all visible and managed from a single console, with built-in security policies.N/A
Pricing
B2Win SuiteRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
B2Win SuiteRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
B2Win SuiteRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
B2Win SuiteRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
B2Win Suite
-
Ratings
Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
8.4
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Security and Isolation00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Cluster Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Storage Management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Discovery Tools00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
B2Win SuiteRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Docker
Docker
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
IBM Cloud Kubernetes Service
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
B2Win SuiteRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
B2Win SuiteRed Hat Advanced Cluster Management for Kubernetes
Likelihood to Recommend
NAZDAQ
It suited well to work on projects with team members that worked remotely. Especially bigger, more time-consuming projects and the ones with higher visual expectations have had great success with this suite. We used it in teams and had a good workflow going with it so far and would recommend it.
Read full review
Red Hat
Well suited for - Large-scale Edge deployments of OpenShift instances. Policy-based consistency for all workloads is Less appropriate for - Small-scale deployments. Stand-alone deployments of K8s clusters. Deployments in the same data center.
Read full review
Pros
NAZDAQ
  • Presentation.
  • Data Transfer.
  • Easy to use.
  • Good to teamwork.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Continuous deployment of other OpenShift instances.
  • Controls clusters and applications from a single console.
  • Built-in Security & compliance.
Read full review
Cons
NAZDAQ
  • More functions.
  • Speed.
  • Server issues.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Initial deployment of the ACM itself needs to be made easy.
  • Dependency on the Software versions of underlying open shift workloads during upgrades.
  • LCM of ACM itself.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
NAZDAQ
B2Win has had some benefits, better visual aspects and the data transfer was great and easy. Our team has learned to use it very quickly and had no issues using it. Other platforms, such as Google Workspace have a better reputation, more users and their development are faster because of a higher budget. That being said down the road we might switch over to Google again unless B2Win can stay competitive
Read full review
Red Hat
I have also used TNA by Google Cloud, but that is not mature enough as ACM. Right now, ACM is the best choice as a cluster manager for private cloud data centers.
Read full review
Return on Investment
NAZDAQ
  • Improved quality of work.
  • Easy way to change formats.
  • Faster way to get work done.
Read full review
Red Hat
  • Reduced the deployment duration of individual nodes by 50%.
  • Acts as a central manager for all the clusters.
  • Provides a lot of infrastructure options (storage, networking, etc) to build instances of your choice.
Read full review
ScreenShots