Beamery vs. Fetcher

Well suited for organizations that are tracked and managing large amounts of candidates across open roles. They have really improved the overall product and it has a lot fewer technical issues, so big or small companies could find it useful.

Incentivized

Fetcher is best suited to targeted roles with specific job titles, functional responsibilities, and other criteria (eg. years of experience, etc). It is less effective at sourcing for generalized titles, responsibilities, and overly broad roles.

Incentivized

• Beamery is a solid ATS system that simplifies the outreach process.
• It allows the user to customize a ton of their stages and workflows, to make it highly specific to the company/user's needs.

Incentivized

• Email automation
• Identifying top talent
• Exporting candidates to our ATS

Incentivized

• The Chrome Extension could really use some work: very buggy and it's pretty common for candidates that are already in our system to not show up as such in the Extension.
• The internal searching features are limited: we have a massive database that is really hard to access.

Incentivized

• Prefab email templates
• Dashboard

Incentivized

You can sometimes get bounced around from person to person. Tickets can take some time to get looked over by Engineering.

Incentivized

Fetcher has been our #1 used tool on the Recruiting team over the last year. We have found significant value across the board compared to other tools we have tried.

Incentivized

• Overall positive, despite the issues, the reason we are still on it is because it does what it is built for well.

Incentivized

• Saved tens of thousands of dollars on recruiting agency fees
• Hired effectively and promptly, with minimal time investment from Hiring Manager

Incentivized