Bitochon Sales CRM Portal vs. Oncontact

It is really suitable in case of enterprise sales as it helps reduce wastage and makes the process lean, it emulates the quality of the prerequisites of an ideal CRM and does it really well, it also helps in reducing the extent of work for the entire sales channel, easy to integrate with other dashboard panels, not ideal for a highly data based model as duplicacy is a big factor.

Incentivized

Oncontact is an excellent software/service, and it covers a tremendous breadth of usage scenarios. The customization means that customers can adapt it as they see fit. About the only place where I don't see it as a great fit is in minimal implementations. A lot is going on, and using it for small tasks isn't the best use of the software.

Incentivized

• Manage Leads, Client Conversions, Touch up points and all other order data.
• Integration with other platforms such as Vinculum etc provides ease of work.
• Ease of Analysis of performance and matching of targets.

Incentivized

• Company Name
• Contacts

Incentivized

• Has a bit of redundancy and data duplicity problems, different employees can make duplicate entries for same clients
• Sometimes non-responsive glitches appear
• Different users see different data for same clients sometimes

Incentivized

• Customization could be easier. Just about anything is possible, but the learning curve is steep.
• More focus on mass loading

Incentivized

The company has been using Oncontact for some time now. Many of the business processes require the use of a CRM software package. It helps solve some pretty serious problems, and overall the cost is very justified. Also, the developer is very good at keeping it up to date and introducing new functionality.

Incentivized

Bitochon stacks up almost equally with zoho in most of the applications and functions for the sales team although zoho has better dashboard management and ease of analytics as compared to bitochon but bitochon stacks up easily as the better one in terms of api integration and ease of operation.

Incentivized

• Oncontact provided many, but not all of the features of Salesforce.com. However, the complexity and cost involved in Salesforce.com was an overriding factor for us to use Oncontact. Not just the initial and licensing fee, but it seemed that just about everything we wanted to do involved consultants or more work or licensing. Oncontact was easier to implement out of the box, even when we did need to make customizations.
• We looked at Microsoft 365 Business, and while it was comparable in price for the initial cost, the integration with our other software systems was not built-in, so we did not pursue it very much.

Incentivized

• Has really improved the productivity of the entire sales channel and operations team
• Ease for accounts and other software integration
• Improves overall interconnectivity of all departments

Incentivized

• Don't know, I only use occasionally

Incentivized