Bound vs. DemandScience

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Bound
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
Bound (formerly Get Smart Content) is a website segmentation and targeting platform that enables marketers to read a website visitor's digital body language and serve relevant content based on the person's stage in the buying journey. Using behavioral, demographic, and firmographic data, Bound creates personalized web experiences for both anonymous and known website visitors to increase the effectiveness of marketing efforts and dramatically reduce the buyer's path to conversion. Bound partners…N/A
DemandScience
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
DemandScience is a data-driven marketing platform that offers lead generation and data services that accelerate the technology sales process by identifying intent among technology buyers. Founded in 2009, DemandScience helps marketers meet the ever-changing demands of B2B sales.N/A
Pricing
BoundDemandScience
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BoundDemandScience
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BoundDemandScience
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
BoundDemandScience
Testing and Experimentation
Comparison of Testing and Experimentation features of Product A and Product B
Bound
9.7
1 Ratings
12% above category average
DemandScience
-
Ratings
a/b experiment testing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Split URL testing9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Multivariate testing9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Multi-page/funnel testing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Cross-browser testing10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app testing9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Test significance10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual / WYSIWYG editor10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced code editor10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Page surveys10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Visitor recordings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Preview mode10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Test duration calculator10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiment scheduler9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiment workflow and approval10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic experiment activation9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Client-side tests10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Server-side tests10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Mutually exclusive tests10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Audience Segmentation & Targeting
Comparison of Audience Segmentation & Targeting features of Product A and Product B
Bound
9.8
1 Ratings
11% above category average
DemandScience
-
Ratings
Standard visitor segmentation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Behavioral visitor segmentation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Traffic allocation control9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Website personalization10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Results and Analysis
Comparison of Results and Analysis features of Product A and Product B
Bound
9.4
1 Ratings
9% above category average
DemandScience
-
Ratings
Heatmap tool10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Click analytics10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Scroll maps9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Form fill analysis10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Conversion tracking8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Goal tracking9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Test reporting9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Results segmentation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
CSV export10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Experiments results dashboard9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Content Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Bound
-
Ratings
DemandScience
7.6
17 Ratings
3% below category average
Audience profiling and targeting00 Ratings8.317 Ratings
Content performance analytics00 Ratings7.614 Ratings
Campaign optimization dashboard00 Ratings6.910 Ratings
Best Alternatives
BoundDemandScience
Small Businesses
Convert Experiences
Convert Experiences
Score 9.5 out of 10
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Kameleoon
Kameleoon
Score 9.5 out of 10
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Kameleoon
Kameleoon
Score 9.5 out of 10
Vyond
Vyond
Score 8.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BoundDemandScience
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(5 ratings)
7.6
(75 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
6.0
(2 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
6.2
(3 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
6.8
(69 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
4.3
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
BoundDemandScience
Likelihood to Recommend
Bound Systems, Inc.
I think the customer service and relationship we have with Get Smart Content is great
Read full review
DemandScience
Demand Science did deliver the quantity of leads without issue. The data for a few was not accurate (bounced when following up). But they agreed to make good by providing substitute leads to meet the quota. Towards the end of my project, they lost a few folks, and so the end of my campaign got a little rough as they were taking over some assignments midway. But we ultimately completed the SOW. I will say that the leads did not perform well in our email cadence - none converted. However, this was a test of the concept for us. Content syndication had a lower cost per qualified lead than some other tactics, so we tested it. Your results may vary, based on your follow-up and your market.
Read full review
Pros
Bound Systems, Inc.
  • Connects easily with other APIs such as Demandbase and Google Analytics.
  • Easily create segments.
  • Easily create segmented content.
Read full review
DemandScience
  • The initial pitch and contact from Mason used "show me you know me" well, which we felt was a good sign of company culture and approach to database marketing.
  • Delivery of leads was ahead of schedule.
  • They set expectations, and then delivered what they said they would.
  • The leads matched our criteria as agreed.
  • Regular check ins and catch ups, and patience when thing were taking a bit of time to get sorted here.
Read full review
Cons
Bound Systems, Inc.
  • When you set up a campaign you should be able to set up content while in the campaign.
  • You should be able to set up new segments while in the campaign.
Read full review
DemandScience
  • We would like to see more proactive communication on what's working and what's not without requiring a meeting - regular reporting cadence to assess asset quality
  • A dashboard view might be nice as well, again, so we can look at an asset and see how it's performing (or if it isn't) without having to wait on a rep to pull a report or schedule a walkthrough
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Bound Systems, Inc.
No answers on this topic
DemandScience
Our executives decided to not renew because we were not seeing the ROI they were looking for. However, our executives did not make the best decisions on the data Demand Science provided.
Read full review
Usability
Bound Systems, Inc.
No answers on this topic
DemandScience
The leads were pretty straight forward. However, their appointment setting did not integrate well into our system and many of the meetings didn't occur. I had to chase a lot of prospects and many times Demand Science didn't provide direct dials.
Read full review
Support Rating
Bound Systems, Inc.
No answers on this topic
DemandScience
Our rep is always available and quickly responds to any question we have. I haven't worked with other partners who are as proactive and excited to help us as our DemandScience rep is. He reaches out with new ideas and suggestions frequently. They are happy to make any changes needed to the campaigns and make those changes quickly and efficiently. They work well with our execution agency, but are also happy to meet with us directly to provide insights and support.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Bound Systems, Inc.
No answers on this topic
DemandScience
They did extremely well. However, our executives did a poor job in defining our ICP so we didn't get the maximum benefit out of it.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Bound Systems, Inc.
It has the inability to export subject line or ISP complaints that require manual pulling by each campaign when needed. Results from variable tests are also reported only as a percentage of chosen KPI (opens, clicks, etc.). There's no ability to see hard numbers from the tests or other metrics to determine the statistical significance or unintended results (maybe opens increased per the test, but we saw clicks or conversions were lower). On the other hand, Bound performs absolutely great.
Read full review
DemandScience
I've not used another content syndication company, and I probably won't after the lack of results we've had. I have used direct email organizations, and they are stronger but also more expensive, so you have to weigh your priorities. I could see if you were selling a specific product or software and how this could be beneficial, but I'd steer away from it for services.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Bound Systems, Inc.
  • We have seen more traffic going to revenue generating sites after using Get Smart Content. I'm not sure of the dollar amount since that's a separate department, but traffic increasing is great.
  • Engagement on our internal site has increased after implementing Get Smart Content. We are getting more views, comments and likes on our content than before.
Read full review
DemandScience
  • We have been able to grow our lead numbers with high quality leads at a reasonable cost
  • We have been able to generate just the leads we want to support our Business Development team
  • We have been able to get our content in front of our specific TAL
Read full review
ScreenShots

Bound Screenshots

Screenshot of Campaign viewScreenshot of Segment viewScreenshot of Segment list