BP Logix Process Director vs. CoreIntegrator Workflow

It simply works great for our applications and requirements!

I have found CoreIntegrator to work well for our needs as an Accounts Payable workflow solution. The system was implemented with very little internal technical assistance. It can be administered by a business user without a great deal of technical knowledge because the CI support staff is knowledgeable and helpful.

• BP Logix Process Director has an extremely easy to use graphical workflow designer.
• Good support for electronic signatures and physical signatures using hardware signature pads.
• Knowledge views and dashboards for easy access to data.

Incentivized

• Integration to Great Plains
• Simple to use

• Having a record of sent emails in a process would be helpful.
• A "scrubber" for PDF names would be helpful. Acrobat does not like to open items with particular characters in a file name.

Incentivized

• The system administration is somewhat difficult for someone that is not highly technical.
• Deleted or removed items appear in search results.

Sometimes we receive slow responses.

We evaluated 13 vendors when looking for a solution for our finance department. We invited 4 vendors to demo and picked BP Logix in late 2011. Integration was very quick and since we went live January 2012 we deployed three additional processes incorporating our finance, facilities, legal, IT and our operations departments.

We didn't review another product because CoreIntegrator so perfectly met our needs.

Incentivized

• Process Director has had such a positive impact on our entire organization. Nearly every division and department throughout the whole organization either has working forms and workflows or has requested to have forms and workflows developed.
• The only negative or adverse condition is that we don't have enough development time for all the workflows requested to be developed.

• Time saving outweighs the cost.
• Ease of use is so much better than most software solutions.

Incentivized