Broadcom Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Micro Focus Network Node Manager i

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Broadcom Unified Infrastructure Management
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Broadcom Unified Infrastructure Manager, formerly from CA Technologies, is a unified tool for systems monitoring and analytics. It offers multiple deployment options for IT teams and MSPs .N/A
Micro Focus Network Node Manager i
Score 8.4 out of 10
N/A
Network Node Manager i (formerly HP Network Node Manager) is a network management platform acquired by Micro Focus from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise.N/A
Pricing
Broadcom Unified Infrastructure ManagementMicro Focus Network Node Manager i
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Broadcom Unified Infrastructure ManagementMicro Focus Network Node Manager i
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Broadcom Unified Infrastructure ManagementMicro Focus Network Node Manager i
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Broadcom Unified Infrastructure ManagementMicro Focus Network Node Manager i
Small Businesses
Auvik
Auvik
Score 8.5 out of 10
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Instana
IBM Instana
Score 9.0 out of 10
Intermapper
Intermapper
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Instana
IBM Instana
Score 9.0 out of 10
Cisco Prime LAN Management Solution
Cisco Prime LAN Management Solution
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Broadcom Unified Infrastructure ManagementMicro Focus Network Node Manager i
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(6 ratings)
8.0
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
1.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Broadcom Unified Infrastructure ManagementMicro Focus Network Node Manager i
Likelihood to Recommend
Broadcom
Well Suited: - Multiple units (you may split Nimsoft per Groups, companies, etc.) - When your Business Teams NEED Dashboards (they'll love it after they learn how to use, for example, if they discover that the may even run SQL queries together with monitor the webpage of the application, and display business data) Less appropriate: - If you are beginning to monitor your environment (because you need to know your environment at least a little bit to check if the entire set of monitoring Nimsoft plugins will really help you or you will only use it to ping your application) - If you don't have at least one (i do recommend 2 or 3 after some short time) people dedicated to deploy and fine-tune the monitoring. The tool is really good, but if you don't have anyone working on it, you will notice that you're spending money in an elephant to kill an ant or worst, that you passed the entire year, and still have the same problems of the last year, cause no one put the hands enough time in the tool. I saw this happening during the first year when I was the only one working with the tool and still supporting the entire team.
Read full review
Micro Focus
[Micro Focus Network Node Manager i (formerly HP Network Node Manager)] is like you implement it, setup monitoring and alerting and forget it forever until any major activity is there and that is possible because of the product's stability. Another reason for product stability is less features as compared to other vendor tools and its own inbuilt database.
Read full review
Pros
Broadcom
  • Ease of management
  • Unified platform
  • Depth of infrastructure management. Has numerous probes which can help you monitor every aspect of your environment.
Read full review
Micro Focus
  • Network Fault and Performance Monitoring
  • Fault Tolerant
  • Distributed Architecture
  • Stability in operations
Read full review
Cons
Broadcom
  • I'd like to see improvements in inventory management. Currently node management isn't as efficient as I'd like.
  • I also see a big opportunity to offer greater customization in the Detail Tab. I'd like the ability to pick and chose which metrics are displayed by default in the Detail Tab snapshot.
Read full review
Micro Focus
  • Flow monitoring.
  • QoS.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Broadcom
Meets our business requirements
Read full review
Micro Focus
No answers on this topic
Usability
Broadcom
Easy to configure and use.
Read full review
Micro Focus
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Broadcom
Exceed Expectations.
Read full review
Micro Focus
Support is long and arduous and often are unable to help resolve the issue. We often have to do escalations or duty manager to get things moved. Even with a technical account manager, we do not see much improvement from a support point of view. This is an area where Micro Focus has a lot of improvement to do.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Broadcom
Plan it out based on your requirements.
Read full review
Micro Focus
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Broadcom
All tools have their own gaps , some seem to do more than others, some just work better. With UIM we have found a sweet spot with features, price point, pros, cons, etc
Read full review
Micro Focus
Even though there are many products in the market such as from Solarwinds, CA Spectrum (no DX Spectrum), PRTG that offers similar or even with more flexibility the fault and performance monitoring still Micro Focus is a very nice tool when it comes to Scalability and Stability with all necessary monitoring coverage. There is no external database required and hence less issues with integration.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Broadcom
  • Business Units love It - Good for them, but worse for the IT Team until we share the responsibility of the dashboards.
  • If no one put their hands on it, it will take some time to give results. I'm talking about environments with 400 devices, for example, in something about 6 months to one year, if no one is dedicated, and depending on the consulting company. Some, even certified by CA, was not good. If possible, try to use CA services directly.
  • IT Teams, after they start to notice that the tool really work, will want to monitor everything. Depending on the company, this will be more or less easy to measure, as ROI. And I'm telling this because usually IT teams don't know how to sell them to C-Levels, and the tool, because of the price, is always a motivation to questions like: "What is this tool? Do you really need it? Is there another way to monitor this?"
Read full review
Micro Focus
  • HP NNM is very good at producing root cause analysis. MTTR is reduced with NNM.
Read full review
ScreenShots