Likelihood to Recommend I didn't have problems working with BrowserStack. The tool is stable, there are a lot of different devices and OS. It's really useful. I only had a problem in the past while working with a company that had geolocation activated on the app. The app only works in the USA, and I was in Brazil. I faced many many issues working on this circumstances. I tried to get in touch with BrowserStack, but I leave the company before get the problem solved. But that one was the only big problem that I've faced while using BrowserStack.
Read full review UFT mobile works really well if/when you need physical devices under your management. Managing physical devices in any setup is an interesting undertaking due to the various considerations per device. There are really nice best practices, for example using managed USB switches like the one from Cambrionix, that can help make for a really good experience. For us, we only have 1 application at this time that has frequent updates/releases. We are able to test out these with confidence using our suite of real/on-campus devices managed and made available by the UFT Mobile product.
Read full review Pros BrowserStack App Automate dashboard gives us video, screenshots and logs of what exactly happened during the test run. This helps us easily analyse failures in our automation test and figure out the root cause for failures. BrowserStack App Live provides us with lot of devices to test on. This is specifically useful in case of high end iPhone devices which are costly for us to procure in house. BrowserStack App Automate provides parallel threads which can be shared across multiple teams. This has helped us scale our mobile test automation effort across the organisation. In house mobile lab might be cost effective initially but when it comes to maintaining it and add new devices as and when it comes in market makes it less cost effective than cloud solution like BrowserStack Read full review Remote access to real devices within your organization network as compared to public devices library offering, where their is a risk of exposing pre-production builds outside the organization. "Factory built like" integration with HP ALM, HP Sprinter, HP UFT and HP Network Virtualization. Ability to mimic real world conditions in a controlled environment in the devices of your choice. Removed the guess work out of using emulators Able to extend automation to mobile testing using HP UFT. Read full review Cons Overall performance of usability of the device Overheating conditions could be a useful feature to be included Downloading the app to the Home screen for quick selection would be helpful Screen orientation feature Tablets for additional devices to be tested against Add in a feature to test against wearables Read full review Most of our problems are with the lengthy onboarding process with iOS devices. Occasionally Android devices will disconnect themselves. Read full review Likelihood to Renew This decisions mostly taken by senior management at VP and CEO level, they also need approval from many other teams like dev, design according to the use, and finance due to competitive cost, They do check other product as well, and I am just a single person from QA team, and not a decision maker
Read full review The tool continues to meet our expectations and has shown that they are continually evolving the product with new features that benefit us. The most recent new feature was the auto-signing/packaging of iOS apps from the server to allow native interaction of features like biometrics. Prior this was a lengthy exercise.
Read full review Usability It integrates directly in internal networks and local development. The point and click interface of choosing your device, pick the browser/version and you have a working emulation of that exact environment. What else could you ask for? I've set our least computer savvy users up with BrowserStack for testing in minutes. It feels like it's just part of your local environemnt.
Read full review Reliability and Availability Its always available in our organisation. Just a click away from testing on the exact devices we require.
Read full review Performance The tests are fast considering the fact that they're
Appium tests. I've seen tests reliably pass or fail when they're supposed to, with next to zero issues on the BrowserStack side of things. Tests launch only seconds after I kick off them off from my CLI.
Read full review Support Rating I'm saying a 10 for support for BrowserStack only based on feedback from the development team. I myself have never had to reach out to support for any questions or issues, but others in the company have. From my conversations with them, the support was fantastic and had been a pleasure working with the BrowserStack team.
Read full review In-Person Training Yes, it was online training on meet, and trainer looks like skilled and technical strong, he has covered end to end all the features and he has answers all the queries. because of this trainings we are able to implement it by our own in the organization, thank you for support and training.
Read full review Online Training It was a quick training from the support of browserstack, it was nice and easy to understand, thanks again for the support given by the team. and regularly I used to receive mails for training from support for any new feature they launch, I was able to spread same training to all my team and dev.
Read full review Implementation Rating It was new learning for me, till the time I was not aware of such tools are available for manual CBT testing and for automation integration caue I was using some VM for testing, it has increase my knowledge and skill set. It was a fun while implementation and I enjoyed it.
Read full review Alternatives Considered BrowserStack's library of devices and browsers is way bigger than
Chrome DevTools . Additionally, I find that BrowserStack is more accurate than
Chrome DevTools in regards to how pages render on the various devices I need to test on. Overall, BrowserStack is far better than
Chrome DevTools .
Read full review HP Mobile Center stacks well against solutions like Mobile Labs Device Connect, Perfecto Mobile and Device Anywhere. Its native integration with
HP ALM and HP
UFT makes it a clear choice for team already using those solutions. HP Mobile Center also provides extension to Amazon Device Library.
Read full review Contract Terms and Pricing Model Not sure about all this billing details, I am not part of that discussion.
Read full review Scalability It provides us with the latest technology in the market, which enable us to make sure that the software we create is accessible on them.
Read full review Professional Services Not used
Read full review Return on Investment Saves a lot of money, by providing several devices at our disposal It gives you devices like, mobile phones, tabs and desktops of various Operating Systems Only Challenge is it might consume more time for development, but testing should be fast and easy Read full review Efficient use of the devices. Reduced the idle time. Better control over access and user management. Testing within our controlled environments. Better control of device matrix. Faster testing cycles. Early design bugs to development teams. Real devices means, less guess work. Read full review ScreenShots