BuildOps vs. IFS Field Service Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
BuildOps
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
BuildOps enables subcontractors to run their business on one software solution that manages their invoicing & billing, scheduling, estimates, proposals, payments, workflows, custom forms, and financial reporting. The cloud-based BuildOps has been designed and built by a team of subcontractors & engineers, at the company of the same name headquartered in Santa Monica.N/A
IFS Field Service Management
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
IFS Field Service Management (formerly Metrix) is the field service management application from Industrial and Financial Systems (IFS). It is built around features such as a contact center, dynamic scheduling, and service contract management.N/A
Pricing
BuildOpsIFS Field Service Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
BuildOpsIFS Field Service Management
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
BuildOpsIFS Field Service Management
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
BuildOpsIFS Field Service Management
Small Businesses
Method:CRM
Method:CRM
Score 9.7 out of 10
Method:CRM
Method:CRM
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Jotform
Jotform
Score 8.9 out of 10
Jotform
Jotform
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
ServiceNow Customer Service Management
ServiceNow Customer Service Management
Score 7.9 out of 10
ServiceNow Customer Service Management
ServiceNow Customer Service Management
Score 7.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
BuildOpsIFS Field Service Management
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
BuildOpsIFS Field Service Management
Likelihood to Recommend
BuildOps
BuildOps is well suited for any HVAC or commercial construction business there is no question about it. If you have teams of people in the field and you want to track them and the jobs and reduce the paperwork - think BuildOps. Their operations side functionality is strong too - quoting, invoicing, asset tracking, etc.
Read full review
IFS
IFS Field Service Management is well suited for ad-hoc reporting and querying of your dataset(s). It also is great for inventory management, processing orders, and handling EDI transaction sets to third party partners and suppliers.
Read full review
Pros
BuildOps
No answers on this topic
IFS
  • Order Placement - IFS makes placing orders quite easy. From the simple interface down to selecting inventory, the experience is simple and clean
  • Reporting - Querying database records is straightforward and easy to do. Queries can then be drilled down to individual records or exported to excel for further manipulation and analysis.
  • Customer Creation - Creating new customers and managing and maintaining existing records is a simple and easily repeatable exercise
Read full review
Cons
BuildOps
No answers on this topic
IFS
  • Field Customization - Adding fields or inputs to particular entities is not very easy. In a world of point and click development, IFS is behind the curve
  • Order Automation - for bulk order placement it would be nice to have an easy mechanism to upload orders via an Excel or csv template. We've written some custom programs to perform this, but a more user friendly, "out of box" solution would be welcomed.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
BuildOps
No answers on this topic
IFS
I was not part of the software selection process and cannot provide insight into any of the alternatives in this arena at this time.
Read full review
Return on Investment
BuildOps
No answers on this topic
IFS
  • Positive - streamlined order processing has allowed our business to scale without requiring additional bodies for that specific need.
  • Positive - Reporting has allowed valuable insight into historic business trends which has allowed us to be proactive instead of reactive in many areas.
  • Negative - Customizations have proved costly and cumbersome when upgrading to the next version of the software.
Read full review
ScreenShots