Bullhorn Connexys vs. JobDiva

Bullhorn Connexys manage to improve the precedent and of the candidates, exponential and scalable growth is generated in most of the departments, although the only department that uses this tool is the human resources department, we have noticed that in general, all the jobs have improved All hired personnel are selected through an advanced selection filter to guarantee the hiring of only trained personnel or the one with the best work quality.

Incentivized

Data driven recruitment management, we want to track KPIs like time to fill, cost per hire, and recruiter productivity to improve our recruitment processes, Jobdiva helping us to track this through real-time dashboards and reports. it is helping us to track status of candidates to manage pipelines in hiring process and to identify at what stage they are losing candidates.

Incentivized

• Finding potential candidates.
• Building relationships with candidates.
• Building relationships with clients.

Incentivized

• Candidate process - sourcing to submittal, do a great job of empowering recruiters
• Manager contact - single view of contact and all history, makes it very simple to find manager data, history and talking points
• Reporting - great job with canned reports to help understand where we are across the entire staffing lifecycle

Incentivized

• Posting a job vacancy is a simple and quick task.
• The selection of the most qualified personnel is carried out thanks to Bullhorn Connexys.

Incentivized

• This is intended to be customizable to what we as the customer needs, because it is a huge company we feel that this is more like pulling teeth to get something specific we need adapted into the system.
• It would be nice to have multiple pages possible for the attributes. Just a thought.

Incentivized

We have invested a lot of time and technically money (on the part of our people) in JobDiva. We had an independent company come in and do a gap analysis to tell us where we were using the product as we should be and where we were not. We are working on correcting things that we are not doing to "best practice" for our business.

Incentivized

We use Bullhorn to help us recruit, hiring, and manage the complete recruitment and applicant tracking process. We use it to manage the placement and activities of all employee data necessary to manage that placement. All of the data is accessible in one system and provides us with a complete array of reports. There is a learning curve...but...it is easy to use.

Incentivized

JobDiva is one of the best applicant tracking systems - it's easy for recruiters to use and provides the ability to quickly build a search and filter millions of resumes of available candidates with the required levels of experience, skills or attributes. Jobdiva itself is a very intelligent and powerful tool to recruit and source qualified candidates.

Over all I think JobDiva works well. It has some issues from time to time, but the support staff seems to handle it quickly. The major issue is the email merges getting black listed as spam. That takes away a very important JobDiva feature. That is our major functionality complaint these days

Incentivized

Usually, we don't come across downtime or any such issues. However, whenever required, the Support team is always up and ready to solve it as soon as possible. One of its best features is it always Notifies users of any changes related to any of its uses or new additions.

The support team is quick in responding with to the point answers. Jobidva has few great features like Divareach.

Incentivized

I wasnt part of the training as i joined after Ceipal signed agreement with us.

Incentivized

This is a SaaS platform so the implementation is easy. One thing to consider is to make sure your organization has agreed to this system. Not all will like it but atleast everyone must understand how this will impact Staffing efforts in a positive way. Once everyone is bought then the rest is smooth. The reason I mention this is because after the implementation some where reluctant to change thus not maximizing JOBDIVA to its full capacity.

Incentivized

Bullhorn is a much quicker process than Indeed. I used both platforms and have had success with both. However, if I want a job filled quicker my best bet is bullhorn because it instantly gets delivered to the candidate's email. Whereas Indeed, the candidate has to log into the website to see my job posting.

Incentivized

Bullhorn seemed very focused on integration with LinkedIn but was missing on other factors. WinSearch was lacking as an ATS on all fronts, mass email would go to same people, there was no real prevention of duplicates and there was really no great way to link information and easy access later on

Incentivized

• The percentage term shows the positive increase in the development of hiring linked to different work areas.
• The vacancies are filled by qualified personnel in a really short time.

Incentivized

• It had a positive impact of the number of candidates I was able to reach and which actually helped to increase the hiring rate at one of our clients.
• The reporting system in JobDiva. It actually helped to focus more on the business objectives instead of documenting about each and every employee.
• The only negative it had was that in a ew positions (asking for niche skills), when it required to submit candidates in a quick time, the other vendors were able t he win the race.