CA Workload Automation vs. IBM Workload Automation

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CA Workload Automation
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
As the name may suggest, CA Workload Automation is CA Technologies workload automation offering.N/A
IBM Workload Automation
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
IBM Workload Automation (IBM Workload Scheduler, formerly Tivoli Workload Scheduler is IBM's IT workload automation offering.N/A
Pricing
CA Workload AutomationIBM Workload Automation
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CA Workload AutomationIBM Workload Automation
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CA Workload AutomationIBM Workload Automation
Top Pros
Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
CA Workload AutomationIBM Workload Automation
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
CA Workload Automation
9.4
4 Ratings
14% above category average
IBM Workload Automation
-
Ratings
Multi-platform scheduling9.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Central monitoring9.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Logging9.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications9.74 Ratings00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
Application integration8.94 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CA Workload AutomationIBM Workload Automation
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Score 8.6 out of 10
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
ActiveBatch Workload Automation
Score 8.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.4 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CA Workload AutomationIBM Workload Automation
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.7
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
CA Workload AutomationIBM Workload Automation
Likelihood to Recommend
Broadcom
CA Workload Automation is well suited for firms having to manage and monitor multiple applications operating in multiple environments. and having SLA requirements. CA Workload Automation is less appropriate and not cost-effective for non-critical applications and/or jobs. CA Workload Automation is ideal for companies that require reliable and stable Production support for their business critical jobs to finish on time.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Pros
Broadcom
  • All batch jobs can be monitored from one dashboard.
  • Provides detailed error logs.
  • We have developed packages to invoke OIC integrations through Autosys.
  • Notifications is a good feature when job fails or runs beyond cutoff time.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Cons
Broadcom
  • Monitoring of front-end websites.
  • More utilization insights if possible.
  • Customer service via chat in the future if possible.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Usability
Broadcom
Very happy!
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Broadcom
It would be great if customer chat experience is also readily available.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Broadcom
We selected CA Workload Automation for the ease of integration and less time to setup. It has less overhead to manage the application and is a very robust application.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Broadcom
  • CA Workload Automation has improved SLA by 50%.
  • CA Workload Automation has reduced job failures by 60%.
  • CA Workload Automation has improved staff productivity and problem resolution.
  • CA Workload Automation has improved application availability.
Read full review
IBM
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots