Cakemail vs. Marigold Engage+

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cakemail
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
CakeMail is an email marketing platform from the company of the same name in Montreal with users throughout North America and Europe, designed to be simple and elegant. Dedicated to small businesses and non-technical users, CakeMail's emphasis is the core features of list management, email design (templates), and basic behavior tracking for a modest price. A free trial is available for up to 30 days and 500 sends, after which Cakemail is available starting at $8 per month.N/A
Marigold Engage+
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Marigold Engage+ (formerly Cheetah Messaging or CheetahMail) is an email marketing platform. It is optimized for delivering segmented email marketing campaigns with security in mind. It also integrates with any third-party CRM software.N/A
Pricing
CakemailMarigold Engage+
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CakemailMarigold Engage+
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CakemailMarigold Engage+
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
CakemailMarigold Engage+
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Cakemail
8.6
3 Ratings
6% above category average
Marigold Engage+
-
Ratings
WYSIWYG email editor8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Dynamic content9.53 Ratings00 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content8.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Landing pages9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
A/B testing9.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile optimization10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting8.13 Ratings00 Ratings
List management8.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences6.33 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Cakemail
9.1
3 Ratings
16% above category average
Marigold Engage+
-
Ratings
Dashboards8.63 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports8.63 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Pre-Send Testing
Comparison of Pre-Send Testing features of Product A and Product B
Cakemail
9.4
2 Ratings
10% above category average
Marigold Engage+
-
Ratings
URL Validation9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Link Tracking10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Image Validation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Inbox Display10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Email Accessibility Tools8.52 Ratings00 Ratings
Spelling and Grammar Check10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Email Previews8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CakemailMarigold Engage+
Small Businesses
VerticalResponse
VerticalResponse
Score 10.0 out of 10
Mautic
Mautic
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
VerticalResponse
VerticalResponse
Score 10.0 out of 10
The Trade Desk
The Trade Desk
Score 8.1 out of 10
Enterprises
Emma by Marigold
Emma by Marigold
Score 8.6 out of 10
Iterable
Iterable
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CakemailMarigold Engage+
Likelihood to Recommend
8.5
(3 ratings)
8.0
(11 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(3 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
4.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
2.0
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
3.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
CakemailMarigold Engage+
Likelihood to Recommend
Cakemail
Sometimes creativity is lacking in me and that is where Cakemail comes in and saves the day. I am glad that I can receive creative help from this awesome brand. The pricing is very affordable, in my opinion. It makes this platform a no-brainer!
Read full review
Marigold
I think CheetahMail, being one of the main ESPs in the market, is a quality choice. However, I would suggest that it's really only valuable for a bit larger of an organization, generally having staff of 100+ and revenues in tens of millions -- this is mainly to justify the amount of investment required, so may be cost-prohibitive to some. You also need to make sure that you understand the entire "level of support" you will gain through your specific contract.... the key is understanding what types of resources are within your organization (who's doing the coding? who comes up with the next campaign? What's the overall strategy?) Depending on these questions and resources, may help determine your final needs from a services point of view. CheetahMail can provide a wealth of various services specific to needs (and changes over time as your business changes), but a clear understanding of what you have before you bring them on will really help getting up and running quickly. Also be sure to truly understand the costs for the initial integrations, setups, IP senders, etc.
Read full review
Pros
Cakemail
  • Their templates are easy to use and visually appealing
  • Visibility into our contact information is great
Read full review
Marigold
  • Internal management - This is a great web-based tool that allows our users to see what emails go to whom.
  • Organization - Many layers of organization for templates since there are many types of remarketing emails that we send out.
  • Historical Records - CheetahMail sends us the raw text files of all email actions so we can upload them to our database.
Read full review
Cons
Cakemail
  • An external package – like PHP support – Cake's component doesn't have that.
  • I'd like to be able to view my user click rate and click frequency at the same time, to be able to compare it – they don't offer that.
  • There's always room for improvement – but what Cakemail does well, it does very, very well.
Read full review
Marigold
  • The organization of CheetahMail could at times be better, as you create more and more mailings, they just pile up in a long list. It would be useful to be able to create folders to store specific mailings in. (ex. editorial, newsletters, marketing, etc.)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cakemail
No answers on this topic
Marigold
As I have begun exploring competitors, I've come to realize that every competitor offers so much more functionality and integration than CheetahMail does. When we first signed our contract, CheetahMail was much more innovative and at the forefront of email. Since being bought out by Experian, we've seen a huge decline in service and innovation. They have laid off much of their staff and moved their account representatives to Costa Rica. They also heavily rely on on third parties which you will have to pay large amounts of money for while other Email Service Providers have integrated new technologies into their platform. You will get more for your money going to a different email service such as Responsys, Silverpop, Listrak and the like,
Read full review
Usability
Cakemail
No answers on this topic
Marigold
CheetahMail has a high learning curve to master and requires a lot of backend work with tech teams to set up. Navigation is not the best and everything that should be automated is still extremely manual.
Read full review
Support Rating
Cakemail
No answers on this topic
Marigold
Account reps have a quick response time but a very slow resolution time. Because account reps do not have technical knowledge, there is a long long lead time between flagging a problem and tech team resolution.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cakemail
I have used other email platforms before, but I think Cakemail is easier to use AND provides you with templates. For the other products I have tested out, you had to create your own templates from scratch. I like the ability to create from scratch, but on days where you lack the time or creativity, there are templates ready to go for you
Read full review
Marigold
CheetahMail is very far behind these other providers. Specifically in Lyris we could build forms that automatically generated code connected to specific lists and be up and running in less than a few hours. With CheetahMail that would take days and developers at times.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cakemail
  • Easily track the success of your email campaigns
Read full review
Marigold
  • The customer service team at CheetahMail was good and efficient. It is always a frustrating experience to call in when your stuck on something but the CS team did a good job of quickly and effectively helping us when we called them for support.
  • Compared to other ESPs that our employees support, this platform was quite easy to learn and the documentation provided often helped us figure things out without having to go and call CS.
Read full review
ScreenShots