TrustRadius

Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes is an enterprise Kubernetes solution for multi-cloud operations. Ubuntu is the reference platform for Kubernetes on all major public clouds. Canonical Kubernetes is built on Ubuntu and aims to combine security with optimal price-performance. Canonical's cloud-native automation framework ensures developer productivity and business innovation.N/A
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is a comprehensive service that offers fully managed OpenShift clusters, on IBM Cloud platform. It is directly integrated into the same Kubernetes service that maintains 25 billion on-demand forecasts daily at The Weather Company.N/A
Pricing
Canonical Enterprise KubernetesRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Canonical Enterprise KubernetesRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Canonical Enterprise KubernetesRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Canonical Enterprise KubernetesRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Container Management
Comparison of Container Management features of Product A and Product B
Canonical Enterprise Kubernetes
-
Ratings
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
7.9
4 Ratings
1% above category average
Security and Isolation00 Ratings8.54 Ratings
Container Orchestration00 Ratings8.54 Ratings
Cluster Management00 Ratings7.94 Ratings
Storage Management00 Ratings8.24 Ratings
Resource Allocation and Optimization00 Ratings7.94 Ratings
Discovery Tools00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Update Rollouts and Rollbacks00 Ratings7.73 Ratings
Self-Healing and Recovery00 Ratings7.64 Ratings
Analytics, Monitoring, and Logging00 Ratings7.84 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Canonical Enterprise KubernetesRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Small Businesses
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.3 out of 10
Portainer
Portainer
Score 9.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Docker
Docker
Score 9.2 out of 10
Docker
Docker
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Docker
Docker
Score 9.2 out of 10
Docker
Docker
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Canonical Enterprise KubernetesRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(13 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Canonical Enterprise KubernetesRed Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
IBM
RedHat OpenShift is not only suited for IBM Cloud but can run in ANY cloud. We installed in Azure Cloud, for example. It can also run on Linux servers or a Power 9 machine. It is built for multi-cloud or on-prem environments. IBM support provides such excellent guidance in the installation and configuration that no other product on the market can beat it.
SB
Susan Barker
Sr. Domain Solution Architect, II
Read full review
Pros
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • Multiclick provisioning of resources makes it super easy to manage pods and deployments. We don't have to maintain code for the same
  • In built security features and customizability ensures that organization wide standards are integrated well into the containers
  • Automated backups, scale ups and fail recovery makes sure of minimal down time
DP
Dushyant Pathak
Software Engineer
Read full review
Cons
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • I wish it had better compatibility with docker file syntax. We had issues when it couldn't build standard docker files
  • Wish it had better documentation
  • Wish they offered fully supported client libraries for the Openshift API rather than dumping it on a 3rd party
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Support Rating
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
IBM
I think response time for IBM Cloud support should be improved.
Gonzalo Angeleri | TrustRadius Reviewer
Gonzalo Angeleri
Regional Product & Solution Architect Manager
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
IBM
We evaluated a number of potential solutions and ultimately chose Red Hat OpenShift because it was compatible with our existing technology. Time and costs savings have been realized throughout the company since we implemented Red Hat OpenShift, and the IT department has been freed up to focus on activities that are more valuable.
SA
Stuart Anderson
Head of Innovation & IT Infrastructure
Read full review
Return on Investment
Canonical Ltd
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • Our customer satisfaction and NPS score has had positive outcomes based on new architecture
  • We are focused on business outcomes vs running the service and maintenance
  • OpenShift on IBM Cloud has had a direct, positive impact on TCO, ROI, and payback period
  • Our staff is more focused on higher-level business activities, i.e. acquiring & customer retention
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
ScreenShots