CB Permissions Replicator vs. Planview AgilePlace

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CB Replicator
Score 2.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
A major problem of storing Dynamics 365 documents in SharePoint is the missing synchronization of privileges and permissions. This allows unauthorized SharePoint users to access private documents and sensitive data even if they don’t have CRM privileges to do so. CB Replicator, is an out-of-the-box solution that is designed to remedy this issue by automatically synchronizing Dynamics CRM privileges with SharePoint permissions.
$3,600
per 100 users
Planview AgilePlace
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
AgilePlace is a project management solution built around flexibility, data-driven analytics, and workflow automation. The software was acquired by Planview in December 2017 to expand that company's capabilities.
$19
per user, per month
Pricing
CB Permissions ReplicatorPlanview AgilePlace
Editions & Modules
CB Dynamics CRM to SharePoint Permission Replicator for 100 User
$3,600
per 100 users
Teams
$19
per user, per month
Scaled Teams
$29
per user, per month
Custom
Contact Sales for Quote
per user, per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CB ReplicatorPlanview AgilePlace
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup Fee$80 per userNo setup fee
Additional Details—All editions include unlimited boards.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
CB Permissions ReplicatorPlanview AgilePlace
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
CB Permissions ReplicatorPlanview AgilePlace
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
CB Permissions Replicator
-
Ratings
Planview AgilePlace
7.0
21 Ratings
2% below category average
Task Management00 Ratings7.921 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings7.319 Ratings
Gantt Charts00 Ratings6.712 Ratings
Scheduling00 Ratings6.517 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings7.917 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings6.812 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings6.57 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings7.315 Ratings
Mobile Access00 Ratings6.812 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings6.44 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings6.68 Ratings
Visual planning tools00 Ratings8.07 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
CB Permissions Replicator
-
Ratings
Planview AgilePlace
7.3
5 Ratings
4% below category average
DevOps Tool Integrations00 Ratings7.33 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers00 Ratings7.35 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CB Permissions ReplicatorPlanview AgilePlace
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.7 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 9.2 out of 10
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CB Permissions ReplicatorPlanview AgilePlace
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.9
(27 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.7
(3 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.2
(5 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.3
(2 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.7
(3 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
7.0
(2 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(2 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
9.3
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
CB Permissions ReplicatorPlanview AgilePlace
Likelihood to Recommend
Connecting Software
It is an ideal program for the portfolio of already consolidated clients, for large financial companies with a high professional profile. In the cases that I do not recommend it, it is for small and medium-sized financial companies, with a portfolio of clients in training, since the cost-benefit ratio is not attractive.
Read full review
Planview
This tool enables the visual management needed in many offshore teams to easily and quickly see the pending work, work in progress and completed work.For teams that work with a waterfall methodology and do not have AGILE internalized, I believe there are other solutions from Planview or other providers.
Read full review
Pros
Connecting Software
  • Visually friendly for the end user, maintaining the most common design style for workers
  • The adaptation time and the learning curve is relatively shorter than other similar applications
Read full review
Planview
  • Ability to color code cards based on type, giving better visibility to the variety of tasks a team handles
  • Ability to set deadline dates and have those dates easily visible
  • Flexibility in design the kanban board. It is easy to add a lane or make a change on the fly. Work doesn't have to stop and a long process created to make simple layout changes.
  • Movement of cards is easy as well as the ability to connect cards to show dependencies.
Read full review
Cons
Connecting Software
  • The graphics could be developed in a better way, they should be more modern, friendly and show the information in more detail.
  • Develop a module in the application that allows personalization by the user, giving him the possibility to manage a tool made by him to suit him. Moves the APPS Mobile concept to the design of the program.
  • Although the tool is well integrated with Microsoft, you can think of a development of integration with social networks or mobile developments, both users, and customers.
  • Develop a more economical and simple version, aimed at small and medium enterprises, with small client portfolios
Read full review
Planview
  • Planview LeanKit currently can't or should not be used as a central spot for data and collaboration. Particularly attachments are not well-handled.
  • The portable side of Planview LeanKit is really lacking.
  • We would appreciate some options to group or stack cards.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Connecting Software
It is a complementary tool of the main CRM, which provides an adequate management of the documentation, reports, files that are derived from the business activity. It offers adequate levels of security for small businesses, the implementation is easy compared to other tools, it is easy to use, it offers adequate file capacity. In the future it can be strengthened with access to the cloud, development of apps and integration with other platforms.
Read full review
Planview
Perfect tool to manage requirement backlog
Read full review
Usability
Connecting Software
As it has already been said before, it is a simple implementation program, easy to use, with a short learning curve, with a friendly interface, a good design, a security according to the type of company and with the possibility of personalization. It provides an accessible cost tool to improve business management and document management.
Read full review
Planview
LeanKit isn't the best designed Kanban system I've seen, but overall it's pretty usable. The boards I've used are pretty complex, so it can be difficult to find things. I found that searching and filtering for specific cards was somewhat of a challenge. Dragging a card from one lane to another is kind of a fun way to get things done though.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Connecting Software
No answers on this topic
Planview
Very minimal outages
Read full review
Performance
Connecting Software
No answers on this topic
Planview
Never experienced major slowness
Read full review
Support Rating
Connecting Software
Until now, technical support has not been required to a large extent, but for this question three variables must be taken into account; The level of complexity of the implementation of the tool, the courses, tutorials, training and learning curve of the users, and finally the technical support as such. This tool has implementation attributes and ease of use, reducing the incidence of technical support.
Read full review
Planview
It solves all our needs at this time.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Connecting Software
Check the seller's website, read the technical specifications of the product, calculate the investment in personnel, software and hardware, validate that the management modules document is what they are looking for. Project the integration of the program with the systems that the company manages. Read many reviews and note the most important points of the user experiences.
Read full review
Planview
Very easy.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Connecting Software
Basically, my main experience is focused on Dynamics, I have worked with similar tools developed in a particular way by the firms for which I have worked. They are monitoring tools developed by the system and planning area. For the internal use of the company. Obviously, this is a leading international program.
Read full review
Planview
I think that LeanKit is very similar to Asana's Kanban feature and Trello, but is much less sleek looking than Asana. Asana's clean and sleek UI makes me enjoy project management much more than LeanKit. It might sound silly that the UI makes so much of a difference to me, but it really does. Trello is also sleeker than LeanKit, but I still prefer Asana because it has more customization options and a better interface. We are actually going to look into switching to ClickUp because we wanted something with a better UI. ClickUp seems to have a great UI with a lot of customization options.
Read full review
Scalability
Connecting Software
No answers on this topic
Planview
Good use cases for small/large teams
Read full review
Return on Investment
Connecting Software
  • Without speaking directly of figures, on the positive side of the implementation of the program is tied to the time of learning the tool. In practice, it is much easier to learn by professionals, making the implementation time short, as well as, minimizes the margin of error in the initial handling of the program.
  • As it is a tool for easy learning and with a reduction in the margin of error due to the learning curve, it allows working only with the technical support offered by the provider, without having the need to create an internal department of attention to the user, which lowers costs.
Read full review
Planview
  • Our team meetings are more direct and quick to get through thanks to the better visibility of the workload
  • Easily being able to move cards between team lanes gives instant visibility to where the responsibility for the next step is needed.
Read full review
ScreenShots

CB Replicator Screenshots

Screenshot of User MappingScreenshot of Starting and Stopping the ServiceScreenshot of Edit Configuration

Planview AgilePlace Screenshots

Screenshot of Real-Time Analytics: Utilize board health metrics involving bottlenecks, WIP, and throughput to guide the optimization of workflows, improve velocity, and better prioritize efforts for more predictable delivery. Lean and Agile metrics can be used to assess team performance and promote continuous improvement.Screenshot of PI Planning: Offers enterprise Kanban boards to visualize the work of teams regardless of the methodologies they apply or workflows they follow, and insights into progress and create opportunities for better alignment.Screenshot of Dependency Visualization and Management: Surfaces risks to plans resulting from cross-team dependency conflicts, blockers, and capacity constraints, and helps drive proactive measures to enable teams to deliver on time.Screenshot of Team Planning and Coordination: Boards can be used to breakdown work, build and manage plans, and execute against strategy to deliver more value to customers, faster.