Cegid Talent vs. LinkedIn Talent Hub

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cegid Talent
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
Cegid Talent (based on technology from the former Technomedia, acquired by Cegid in 2016), allows users to manage candidates recruiting, training, performance, compensation, career development and succession. Its business intelligence tools help identify organizational potential in order to drive HR strategies, from the cloud.N/A
LinkedIn Talent Hub
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
LinkedIn Talent is a recruiting solution. It offers core ATS capabilities, as well as proactive recruitment outreach tailored to LinkedIn’s site. LinkedIn Talent also enables competitive insights and recruitment marketing.N/A
Pricing
Cegid TalentLinkedIn Talent Hub
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cegid TalentLinkedIn Talent Hub
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Cegid TalentLinkedIn Talent Hub
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
Cegid Talent
3.3
1 Ratings
76% below category average
LinkedIn Talent Hub
-
Ratings
New hire portal3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools4.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
Cegid Talent
3.0
1 Ratings
78% below category average
LinkedIn Talent Hub
-
Ratings
Manager note taking3.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
Cegid Talent
2.0
1 Ratings
113% below category average
LinkedIn Talent Hub
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Candidate search2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
Cegid Talent
3.5
1 Ratings
70% below category average
LinkedIn Talent Hub
7.0
77 Ratings
13% below category average
Job Requisition Management6.01 Ratings4.163 Ratings
Company Website Posting5.01 Ratings7.067 Ratings
Customized Application Form4.01 Ratings7.059 Ratings
Resume Management6.01 Ratings7.065 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention5.01 Ratings7.953 Ratings
Candidate Search2.01 Ratings8.076 Ratings
Applicant Tracking5.01 Ratings8.058 Ratings
Collaboration1.01 Ratings8.064 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation2.01 Ratings7.256 Ratings
Email Templates5.01 Ratings6.065 Ratings
User Permissions1.01 Ratings6.060 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts3.01 Ratings6.170 Ratings
Reporting1.01 Ratings7.761 Ratings
Publish to Social Media00 Ratings8.067 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting00 Ratings7.069 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Cegid TalentLinkedIn Talent Hub
Small Businesses
Paycor
Paycor
Score 7.4 out of 10
Crelate
Crelate
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Score 7.3 out of 10
Paypro Workforce Management
Paypro Workforce Management
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM
Score 7.3 out of 10
Vibe HCM
Vibe HCM
Score 4.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cegid TalentLinkedIn Talent Hub
Likelihood to Recommend
4.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(79 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(22 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cegid TalentLinkedIn Talent Hub
Likelihood to Recommend
Cegid
Recruiting and human resources is a good use for this tool. To some degree, reporting is fairly appropriate as well, unless you want super detailed reports, then I would say no. Anything related to managing candidate flow and making the recruitment process easier is where this tool is best used, upgrades need to be made so it's more useful in other areas before rolling out.
Read full review
LinkedIn
I really feel like [LinkedIn Talent Hub] has great potential to be used by many many companies. I think if it is made a little more user friendly with a little more development on the back end to remove some bugs, this could be a potential game changer. I have enjoyed working and getting to know this.
Read full review
Pros
Cegid
  • The commands and controls are fairly user friendly. This is a positive because as recruiters we don't want to waste time having to learn odd or awkward controls, we just want to intuitively click.
  • The original implementation process was fairly seamless according to industry standards. This made for a smoother rollout, testing, and implementation phase. We didn't waste too much time with overly complicated technical issues, etc.
Read full review
LinkedIn
  • Source of talent - LinkedIn has become the #1 place to engage talent.
  • Targeting / advertising / sponsoring employment ads are very effective. They are costly, but effective.
  • Connecting with talent via InMails and ability to send InMails to a pretty targeted audience with ease is great. This allows you to reach out/connect fast with people that "fit" what you are looking for. Other sites for recruiting, etc. are hit and miss. The quality of results is the strongest on LinkedIn and has been for many, many years.
Read full review
Cons
Cegid
  • The reporting function needs to be vastly improved. You can run the most basic reports, but if you want to get more granular it requires customization, extra fees, and involving a developer. This piece should be made easier.
  • The lag time between load screens, clicking new screens, etc. was very slow at times. We don't believe this was a connectivity issue, rather something on Technomedia's end.
Read full review
LinkedIn
  • Reporting. Major lacking here. If a job is closed then reopened (which that feature was recently removed), all reporting is wiped clean and picked back up with the "reopen" date. So it doesn't give a full history of the job activity.
  • Lacks adequate approvals in the system.
  • If you're a company with a risk of audits, I would not recommend Talent Hub. They lack compliance: the system allows us to "hire" someone who never applied to the job. Req history could be incomplete with the way reporting functions are set up. The system puts passive "sourced" candidates and applicants in the same bucket for pipeline workflows. Disposition status is inadequate and greatly lacking, etc.
  • Dashboard is not customizable.
  • We do not have our own unique req IDs. The system generates project IDs but these numbers are shared with all their clients, they're not unique to Ora so they are somewhat random and not in order.
  • They do not differentiate between a networking project and an approved requisition.
  • There's more, too many to list.
Read full review
Support Rating
Cegid
No answers on this topic
LinkedIn
Although we never experienced any issues with the LinkedIn Talent platform or required any support, we always knew in the event that we did need assistance, it was readily available. LinkedIn as a whole is always very supportive and responsive whenever I've had any issues or even a simple question in the past. I'm sure anyone experiencing difficulties with the platform would have a resolution from the support team just about instantly.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cegid
Technomedia stacks up below the other listed programs. It may solve the bare minimum of your issues, but when it comes to solving more complex issues and processes, it lacks. When you want to add additions or customize things, the process is very costly and labor intensive as well. If it were priced lower, it would make more sense, but there are much better solutions out there.
Read full review
LinkedIn
It's definitely better than other competitors because of one a better pool of candidates, who are well categorised and filtered, and the database is well updated. Also, it has a better UI with end to end hiring requirement management, that helps to make hiring faster and smarter. The UX though is a bit laggy, which can be improved
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cegid
  • The positive impact of being able to manage candidates and help the overall recruiting process has been great.
  • The addition of new users or customizing other features has proved cumbersome, expensive, and requires additional resources.
Read full review
LinkedIn
  • Positive impact. The tool has helped us in finding quality candidates for our hard to fill positions!
  • Helps in “pipelining” even after we fill a position, we make a folder of prospective candidates that we find through the platform. This list is then revisited once we have additional positions!
  • Outreach to global candidates. We have an office in Spain and we have found so many qualified candidates on the platform to fill those positions!
Read full review
ScreenShots