CentralReach vs. ESO Electronic Health Record

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
CentralReach
Score 6.1 out of 10
N/A
CentralReach, headquartered in Ft. Lauderdale, is a provider of electronic medical record (EMR), practice management, and clinical solutions that enable Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) and related behavioral health practices to deliver quality autism care for superior outcomes. The company supports ABA space with solutions including precision teaching, clinical data collection, scheduling, billing and learning management. Boasting users among more than 100,000 clinicians and educators,…N/A
ESO EHR
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
ESO Electronic Health Record (EHR) is a web-based patient care documentation and reference system for emergency medical responders and firefighters. It's designed to provide easy access to information about patients' medications, allergies, history, etc. from a tablet while in the field, and allow healthcare providers to document patient encounters quickly.N/A
Pricing
CentralReachESO Electronic Health Record
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
CentralReachESO EHR
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Features
CentralReachESO Electronic Health Record
Electronic Medical Records
Comparison of Electronic Medical Records features of Product A and Product B
CentralReach
-
Ratings
ESO Electronic Health Record
6.3
1 Ratings
14% below category average
Charting / document management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Templates00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Mobile/tablet support00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Fax integration00 Ratings5.01 Ratings
Integration with other EMR and PM systems00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Workflow automation00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Customization00 Ratings1.01 Ratings
Medical Security and Privacy
Comparison of Medical Security and Privacy features of Product A and Product B
CentralReach
-
Ratings
ESO Electronic Health Record
9.5
1 Ratings
12% above category average
HIPAA compliance00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Role-based permission levels00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Data backups and redundancy00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Local mode / networking failsafe00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Workflow and Scale
Comparison of Workflow and Scale features of Product A and Product B
CentralReach
-
Ratings
ESO Electronic Health Record
6.0
1 Ratings
27% below category average
Multi-office / multi-physician capabilities00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
CentralReachESO Electronic Health Record
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

athenaClinicals
athenaClinicals
Score 8.6 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Qualifacts CareLogic EHR
Qualifacts CareLogic EHR
Score 9.9 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Epic
Epic
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
CentralReachESO Electronic Health Record
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(4 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
6.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
CentralReachESO Electronic Health Record
Likelihood to Recommend
CentralReach
For an organization providing ABA service, there really is nobody else that even provides a remotely comparable service. It does have limitations and areas of the system that take more training or are less intuitive than one might hope, but their customer support representatives are generally really helpful and they are pretty quick to make updates to better serve their clients. They are incredible at finding efficient ways to reduce workflow, and while the product can be quite pricey, we have found that it has saved us at least 2 FT admin positions through the efficiency it has created and further frees up our clinicians so that they can focus in more on client outcomes. It's instrumental in our ability to scale our operations across locations. Even with its limitations, it's proven to be in a class of its own in the ABA world.
Read full review
ESO Solutions
For most EMS providers, ESO EHR is an ideal solution: It meets 95% of the needs for the typical EMS provider, provides an unparalleled ease of use for field personnel documenting patient care, and is easy to implement and administer. Large EMS systems should carefully consider the limitations of the underdeveloped quality management modules for QA/QI programs. Large or progressive EMS systems with an advanced data analytics/data science capability should be aware of the significant challenges and limitations ESO EHR poses for data use outside of the standard analytics reports.
Read full review
Pros
CentralReach
  • CentralReach is easy to use once you get fully trained.
  • CentralReach helps us schedule our appointments, document our services, and quickly convert those sessions into charges to be billed to payors.
  • CentralReach is always evolving and implementing new features to keep up with client demands and the ever changing healthcare field.
Read full review
ESO Solutions
  • Exceptional user interface/user experience design that is intuitive and easy to use.
  • ESO, as a company, is deeply integrated into the EMS industry and recognizes customer needs better than competitors.
Read full review
Cons
CentralReach
  • Scheduling module has its limitations
  • Instant Chat is not robust
  • The App is terrible!!
Read full review
ESO Solutions
  • The biggest gap is that doing QA/QI is not scalable or streamlined for a large provider. Managing an effective QA/QI program takes an incredible amount of labor and extra work.
  • The lack of customization and custom fields heavily limits use of ESO EHR to capture new data points for internal quality improvement or research projects.
Read full review
Support Rating
CentralReach
It was really good in the beginning and during implementation, now that they have been bought and are scaling support is lacking
Read full review
ESO Solutions
Customer support has been spectacular: Personalized, rapidly available, and very helpful.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
CentralReach
The user functionality is intuitive. The customer service is beyond other products which allows you to be more efficient and effective at using the system. Also, entering programming which is the primary use is very easy and also intuitive. Many parts of the system are connected which auto populate reports for our therapist. On the business side, the scheduling to billing is very effective.
Read full review
ESO Solutions
ESO EHR won out due to ease of use for providers and for administration. Other vendors had greater ability to do data analysis, quality management, and customization but ultimately were significantly more difficult to learn, use, and administer.
Read full review
Return on Investment
CentralReach
  • CR allows us to streamline across locations, share admin staff across locations and automate multiple processes that previously took administrative and clinical time.
  • CR actively seeks to continue to expand and refine their practices and products, and acquire related specialty services - a critical quality in a field that is evolving as quickly as ours is.
  • Using templates through CR and their scheduling and timesheet features ensures that we have an audit-proof system and that all sessions that we provide are in compliance with regulatory agencies for reimbursement.
Read full review
ESO Solutions
  • The ease of use for providers to complete documentation has had a very positive ROI.
  • The ease of administering the software has saved significant money and delivered very positive ROI.
Read full review
ScreenShots