Likelihood to Recommend It would be ideal for a small solution provider looking for an entry level option to handle many of the company's functions at the same time. If customer relationship management, sales reporting, having a indexed eCommerce site, or having the ability to connect to 3rd party solutions is important to you; I would not go with ChannelOnline
Read full review I think CPQ had worked so well for our company because of the widespread nature of our associates and tracking orders that were being placed in multiple time zones. My team specifically needed a way of analyzing these orders to track our progress in real time and sort out any supply orders before they became an issue. If you are in a centralized location with a smaller team then this may not yield much use to you.
Read full review Pros Detailed product information Product reviews Supplier Relationships Read full review Leveraged automation to minimize headcount costs despite 10% year-over-year business growth, and enabled staff to focus on more strategic tasks. Established a flexible CPQ system that scales on demand to easily accommodate the company’s multiple global locations. Improved customer relations by reducing configuration time and allowing sales more time to meet with customers and close orders. Read full review Cons Sales Reporting Features Product Documentation and Training Customer Relationship Management Account Management Supplier Integration New Release Information Search Engine Indexing Custom Solutions Read full review Significant setup time, cost, and maintenance. We have to use an implementation partner Does not always play well with other software, even Oracle software. While this is improved and being further improved, that it was a third party acquisition means things sometimes require a little extra care Additional setup documentation and first walkthroughs would be helpful, especially if it was all in one place Read full review Likelihood to Renew Updates aren't valuable and don't see us ever being ahead of the competition with this solution. Feature enhancements that are released are just attempts to stay relevant with other ERPs in the industry. If you're trying to take your company to the next level this isn't going to be your solution unless you're a very small company
Read full review So far it is all good with BigMachines, looking for new features since Oracle acquisition has created a lot of expectations. We have outlined our limitations (out of box functionality) in our periodic customer successor advice meetings for a while, hope we get a resolution soon. Also, the BigMachines user license fee has increased a lot in the last three years.
Read full review Usability The interface is pretty easy to use and get used to. It's the lack of account, product and customer management usability that hinders ChannelOnline
Read full review The software UI can be as complex or as simple as you need it to be (depending on the business). It does require training others on quote configuration and the order in which to build out order positions prior to configuring a quote. Once users are trained;however, it is fairly straight-forward. The UI is still more static than other new wizard/drag-and-drop models, but it get's the job done
Read full review Reliability and Availability We are down for 5-20 minutes once or twice a month
Read full review Other than one day two years ago and an hour or two a few times since then due to data center outages, it has been very reliable
Read full review Performance It depends upon the day however there are so many failure points with online services, including our internet service, that this is probably closer to 9 with the latest version
Read full review Support Rating Support Staff is very nice and friendly. Most are knowledgeable but other than phone support they're lacking in every category
Read full review Some specific support personal was good and fixed some problems fast using proper solutions. But when one of them went to sleep when we had critical issues and they do unreported commits to our production environment which caused issues and they were hiding it?? you can not give more than a two (maybe even that is too much). They also failed to add a feature for us which also bring the grade down.
Read full review In-Person Training They have pretty good training. Our business analysts have been able to go to entry and advanced level training. They have a train the trainer model. Our business analyst attended training, then trained the rest of our staff.
Read full review Implementation Rating It was a much more technical implementation than we thought. It involved much more code. Future releases have made and will make administering the tool easier. EDL consulting had one good developer, but when he was moved off, they were horrible to work with. The BMI sales team does a “BOA” or a “Business Operation Assessment” which is extremely valuable, not only for them to scope an implementation and get more reach within the organization, but it is also a documentation of business process that most organizations don’t have. It highlights inefficiencies and allows for correction during implementation. Having a dedicated team (in-house) for implementation is key
Read full review Alternatives Considered Oracle engagement is ahead. They are active in the development of the tool and provide great support after implementation. They also listen to their customers and offer opportunities to feedback and provide input through activities like the customer advisory board forum.
Read full review Scalability New features are released twice a year. Often these releases are fixing bugs and will rarely be an enhancement that will take your company to another level of effectiveness
Read full review Return on Investment It handles most business functions so the value is definitely there. Account Management is really inconvenient and will cost you hours of pay if you're in a business with a relatively medium-high employee turnover. It won't easily integrate at all with your website. Lead Management is pretty much non existent. Quotes and orders are fairly easy to manage so employee efficiency could rise. Training and readily available documentation on ChannelOnline is weak. This is especially true for new features. Read full review Increased Sales Rep efficiency. Being able to create multiple quotes ACCURATELY and quickly was a game changer. Large implementation time. It's a little difficult to fit BMI into a SCRUM style build, with multiple working models and prototypes of all 3 simultaneously. A larger fee for licensing and implementation cost. ROI wouldn't be realized in the first year. Read full review ScreenShots