ChartHop vs. IBM IMS

Not Suited - The tool is suited for organizations with an employee count of more than >500. There are much cheaper tools out there for a company size of below 500 employees. Integration with other tools can be improved. Suited - From an admin POV who sometimes works closely with HRs, customization and storing information is great.

Incentivized

We have built a database of a network of bank branches with all the needs of security and recovery/restart. It requires knowledge of obsolete maintenance languages and perhaps it is too rigid in the schemes.

Incentivized

• The org chart is very easy to use
• It can be integrated into other things like internal company websites
• The UI looks nice

Incentivized

• Security
• Reliability
• Big volume of data and good performance

Incentivized

• It took us a lot of time to implement and onboard this tool. Though we love the tool now, the onboarding could have been smoother.
• UI looks outdated, room for improvement. Difficult to navigate.

Incentivized

• Certainly, not being a DB relational penalizes its use
• It should be more flexible
• Open up to more recent languages

Incentivized

This is a whole new ball game with Charthop, there was not the options we have on charthop on adp

Incentivized

Essentially, for a question of reliability and scalability, the performance has always been of an enterprise level. The utilities are efficient and effective.

Incentivized

• Positively helps understanding the whole company structure
• Positive impact on effectively announcing employee changes to the entire company

Incentivized

• The investment made about 20 years ago that has been fully repaid
• Reliability and security of investments
• Unfortunately, it is quite outdated and therefore maintenance costs are higher because the skills are not always available.

Incentivized