Check Point Quantum Security Gateway vs Trustwave Firewall

• Logging -- Logs are clearly displayed with all information about the packet
• Canned reports -- The reports "out of the box" are pretty nice and give you a lot of detail
• Rule Configuration -- Defining (basic) rules is easy to do, and understandable

Read full review

• It is very reliable in environments without permanent refrigeration.
• The rules that it handles are static, but it has some mechanisms for detecting instruments, which for the current users are very good.
• It maintains VPNs in a stable way and its configuration is similar and compatible with other brands.

Read full review

• Check Point has a complex range of reporting tools, some of which can take time to learn and be comfortable with.
• The firewall is solid and needs to have someone with training to manage it which means any little mistake can bring down the network and have you on the phone with Check Point support.
• They are pricey for some of the hardware and reporting tools.

Read full review

• There is no option to include rules type functions, which would be very useful to save configuration time.
• The support is not as helpful as I would like, nor its documentation.
• A friendly graphical interface would be very well accepted.

Read full review

• Although there are better alternatives out there, Check Point delivers results for the price we paid for the system.
• Since implementation, we have not have any major issues with the product, minor issues were resolved in a timely fashion.
• Check Point currently fulfills our need for an outside facing firewall, when our organization grows larger, we will be looking at higher level enterprise solutions.

Read full review

• It is a robust equipment, therefore it is still in use, in a highly isolated environment.
• I think that the investment was recovered from the first moment, from its time when it was very advanced.

Read full review