Cherwell Software was a full suite of service management tools competing with BMC Remedy, ServiceNow, and IBM SmartCloud. It was acquired by Ivanti, and has reached EOL.
N/A
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Oracle Cloud Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) is a core suite of Oracle Cloud software-as-a-service (SaaS) applications. Oracle Expense Management and Oracle Risk Management are part of this solution. Other apps include Financials, Revenue Management, Accounting Hub, PPM, and Procurement. The single cloud platform offers built-in industry standards and modern best practices. ERP software is the backbone of many organizations and Oracle aims to offer a modern, connected…
N/A
Pricing
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
Required
Additional Details
—
Pricing per user varies by component within the Oracle ERP Cloud solution.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Features
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
10.0
53 Ratings
20% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Organize and prioritize service tickets
10.052 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expert directory
10.041 Ratings
00 Ratings
Service restoration
10.035 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-service tools
10.051 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications
10.038 Ratings
00 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation
10.048 Ratings
00 Ratings
ITSM reports and dashboards
10.051 Ratings
00 Ratings
ITSM asset management
Comparison of ITSM asset management features of Product A and Product B
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
10.0
44 Ratings
19% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Configuration mangement
10.042 Ratings
00 Ratings
Asset management dashboard
10.041 Ratings
00 Ratings
Policy and contract enforcement
10.031 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change management
Comparison of Change management features of Product A and Product B
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
10.0
50 Ratings
16% above category average
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
-
Ratings
Change requests repository
10.048 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change calendar
10.044 Ratings
00 Ratings
Service-level management
10.045 Ratings
00 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
9.0
17 Ratings
21% above category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
8.917 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
9.017 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
9.014 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
6.5
176 Ratings
14% below category average
API for custom integration
00 Ratings
7.5173 Ratings
Plug-ins
00 Ratings
5.5147 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
7.3
211 Ratings
13% below category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
9.0191 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
00 Ratings
5.5206 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
5.3
215 Ratings
32% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
6.5204 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
4.0208 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
5.5204 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
8.5
235 Ratings
10% above category average
Accounts payable
00 Ratings
8.0224 Ratings
Accounts receivable
00 Ratings
7.0215 Ratings
Global Financial Support
00 Ratings
7.5167 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
00 Ratings
6.5193 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
00 Ratings
8.0201 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
00 Ratings
6.0183 Ratings
Standardized Processes
00 Ratings
6.5197 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
7.3
159 Ratings
8% below category average
Inventory tracking
00 Ratings
7.0153 Ratings
Automatic reordering
00 Ratings
6.5136 Ratings
Location management
00 Ratings
7.5138 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
7.3
152 Ratings
7% below category average
Pricing
00 Ratings
7.0140 Ratings
Order entry
00 Ratings
7.0145 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
6.0119 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
00 Ratings
7.5130 Ratings
Order Orchestration
00 Ratings
7.0122 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Product A and Product B
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
7.7
201 Ratings
3% above category average
Billing Management
00 Ratings
7.0158 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
7.0174 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
7.0143 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
6.0141 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
7.0170 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Product A and Product B
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
8.2
143 Ratings
8% above category average
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
8.2128 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
8.3130 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
8.2120 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
8.0117 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
00 Ratings
8.3107 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
8.2112 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Product A and Product B
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
7.8
103 Ratings
11% above category average
Project Planning and Scheduling
00 Ratings
7.098 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
00 Ratings
7.091 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
00 Ratings
6.093 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
00 Ratings
6.084 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Product A and Product B
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
8.0
105 Ratings
9% above category average
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
6.090 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Product A and Product B
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
7.8
141 Ratings
11% above category average
Bids Analyzed and Compared
00 Ratings
6.098 Ratings
Contract Authoring
00 Ratings
6.0100 Ratings
Contract Repository
00 Ratings
6.594 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
00 Ratings
8.0114 Ratings
Supplier Management
00 Ratings
8.5118 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Product A and Product B
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
6.8
78 Ratings
4% above category average
Risk Repository
00 Ratings
6.073 Ratings
Control Management
00 Ratings
7.073 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
00 Ratings
7.066 Ratings
Issue Detection
00 Ratings
5.066 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
00 Ratings
5.066 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Product A and Product B
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
7.3
80 Ratings
7% above category average
Transportation Planning and Optimization
00 Ratings
6.064 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
00 Ratings
7.061 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
00 Ratings
6.058 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
00 Ratings
7.063 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
00 Ratings
7.060 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Product A and Product B
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
7.1
73 Ratings
4% below category average
Production Process Design
00 Ratings
7.066 Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
6.068 Ratings
Configuration Management
00 Ratings
6.566 Ratings
Work Execution
00 Ratings
6.064 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
00 Ratings
7.064 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Product A and Product B
Cherwell Service Management (discontinued)
-
Ratings
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
7.7
94 Ratings
7% above category average
Forecasting
00 Ratings
8.091 Ratings
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
7.593 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
00 Ratings
7.085 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Product A and Product B
Well suited in an IT environment where you have limited staff. It can be managed by one administrator. Reliability of the SaaS environment has been excellent. Flexibility in developing automated workflows to open, manage, and close Incidents. Change Management due to ability to modify OOB to meet the needs of our staff. Contract Management allowing us to be notified when a contract or license is up for renewal and setting reminders. Integrations are not easy to create and manage.
Oracle Fusion Cloud is best suited if a customer moves from Oracle eBusiness Suite (on-prem) to a SaaS offering. The transition is comparatively manageable to implement. However, the customer must understand that we cannot have too many customizations in the SaaS model, so many heavily customized on-prem applications would need to be incorporated in the Cloud by using Cloud tools like Oracle Integration Cloud, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Autonomous Database, Oracle APEX provisioned on OCI, etc.
Cherwell's email handling automation works flawlessly. The only time that I have ever needed to reset the automation service that drives it is when my own server that houses the small connecting agent has some kind of problem and disconnects us from our hosted Cherwell instance. It just works. Emails to a certain address always result in a new ticket or update to an existing ticket.
Cherwell is literally 100% customization in so many ways that it would be pointless to try to enumerate them. There is a very sizable list of already-created customizations (called "mApps") that you can download and apply to your instance. If you don't like them you can roll them back in seconds. But you can add and configure entire modules using one of these pre-defined, completely free, add-on packages. It's so easy to add features this way that I check the list of available mApps every month or so just to see what functionality I can add.
Cherwell is still the best tool for the job in the market. Even though Ivanti bought them and are trying to convince everyone to move over to Neurons for ITSM, they have stated Cherwell will remain supported indefinitely and have a roadmap for future Cherwell development. Unfortunately, ISM is not as flexible as Cherwell (and the UX is atrocious), hence why many people are sticking with Cherwell (and why many Cherwell customers never purchased ISM originally)
Oracle ERP cloud is a significant investment for our company. It will be an ongoing software cost and there's no looking back on that. Our users have become very accustomed to this tool that it is not practically feasible to rip them off from this system. So yes we will continue to renew the subscription going forward.
I enjoy the layout and configuration of our Cherwell Service Management instance. It did take me a bit to get used to, as with any new ticketing system, but now that I understand the system more, I thoroughly enjoy it! There are just so many options and the UI is very intuitive.
I like the program, but it is only as good as the initial implementation and the user support required after go-live. I don't think pre-implementation training needs to be too much of a focus, but once you're live, there needs to be an intense focus on working with users and providing high-quality resources to help.
The application is used by big banks like HSBC is a testament to its reliability. I did not hear or experience any outages.Oracle is in the hosting business since long. In its previous avatar, it used to be called as Oracle on demand. So oracle has enough experience and expertise in hosting and managing customers applications in their datacenters. Oracle is the only major company which has platform as a service, database as a service and software as a service product offerings on the cloud.Hence customers can rely on Oracle as many major fortune 500 companies do.
The browser client is mostly acceptable in terms of performance, but still lacks parity with the rich client. The rich client is not very performant at all. It's built on old architecture and relies heavily on a fast internet connection, good caching and database indexing. There are several unwritten rules with form design (and form arrangement) which most users are not aware of, but can severely impact performance in the rich client. This is where the flexibility of Cherwell can come back to bite you if you step outside the boundaries of these unwritten rules
Cloud performance is something that they need to improve. Also it is not consistent. Sometimes for some users it is slow while for others it is fast. This is frustrating for users especially when they are in the middle of what they are doing. We communicated this to Oracle and they suggested to submit request for environment re-sizing. But again this we think should be a proactive effort from Oracle rather than relying on customers to reach out. This is something Oracle definitely needs to work on.
We generally have a good time with Cherwell support, however, there are the few niche cases where I have to explain how Cherwell works to the customer support agent on the other end. A little more product education for tier 1 support could go a long way in helping expedite support requests from SaaS customers.
Support is always providing step by step details to resolve any issue we encounter. If the issue is currently not a functionality or feature of the application they are supportive in offering guidance on submitting an enhancement request. Currently there is an enhancement that will be rolled out by Oracle that was designed for our organization.
I didn't partake in the in-person training, but it was available. I preferred the online method instead, which was a great experience. It was nice to have someone available to bounce questions off of and demonstrate how certain functions worked.
The inperson trainings from Oracle University are effective. The trainers have vast experience and teached thousands of students. In person training will make people sit in a class and do the exercises. One can also learn from other students, who come with different background, industry etc. In person training will be an immersive experience and helps learn more in a short period of time.
The training was great! We got together to review the system, its UI, and how to perform basic functions. Then there was plenty of time to ask questions and test out the system while there was someone available to assist.
We bought online training subscription from Oracle University. The subscription allowed our team to learn the nuts and bolts of the application.The subscription model helps access to all the modules as opposed to buying training for one module. We also leveraged guided learning subscription from Oracle. Guided learning is a state of the art learning application from Oracle. It resides within the application and guides the users on each and every step. This is learning by doing and is very effective. Once you buy guided learning, oracle keeps updating it with the release of new functionality in the quarterly upgrades.
Implementation is a breeze. Each time I've implemented it, we had an outsourced vendor overseeing it & assisting where needed. However, Cherwell OOTB is ready to go, and configuring it for LDAP/SAML, etc. for authentication and user-imports is really straight forward. The infrastructure needed for Cherwell is extremely simple too - and installing the server & database takes no more than 20 mins
Try to use the system as true to generic form as possible and cut over quickly. Parallel implementation is not recommended. If the numbers are accurate and materially similar to prior period - cut over. A small accounting adjustment is much better than millions in project overruns or dual system maintenance.
Much more customizable than other products, especially when ran in a self-hosted environment. Cherwell [Service Management] allows for greater flexibility of custom development and integrations to allow for automating tasks that traditional ITSM apps are not well suited for. Cherwell [Service Management] gives you the freedom to develop your own objects with minimal licensing costs.
Oracle Cloud ERP is more flexible, more negotiable and has better breadth and support worldwide. Their reports are better and speed of implementation is faster. It stacks better since the company is larger, more stable, and has more research and development. There are more references to check with peers too.
We have never had any major show-stopper issues with Cherwell itself - more so with the infrastructure it sits on. Moving from in-house cloud (on Cherwell's side), to AWS then to Azure has caused multiple problems over the years (some still on-going), however the product has remained fairly stable
Orcle ERP Cloud transformed and stabilized in this past 2 years since it was implemented. We have past the auditor reviews and 24 month end closes and 8 quarter closes and 2 FY closes. Above all we do have SEC reporting with all this data. Having said that our ERP subscription is a worthy investment and highly reliable source of information for our organization's needs
As mentioned, they were always great to work with (minus the project management side). My only feedback would be to push back on requirements that don't make sense
As with any standard ticketing system, it helped decrease the time before first contact with clients.
Our department was always concerned with keeping a low budget, and it was cheaper than most.
My supervisor could easily tell how many resources were being put into each employee, so we had more visibility of our team's capabilities at a given time if we needed to take on something complex.