Cisco 1000 Series Aggregation Services Routers (ASR 1000) vs Oracle SD-WAN (Talari)

• These routers are very good at performing 24x7! This is key to running an organization where employees are working 24x7.
• The ZBFW feature works especially well to help lockdown and protect your network.
• Having the ability to perform in-service upgrades is a key feature in keeping your network up at all times.

Read full review

• Failsafe- ability to aggregate low cost link and increase enterprise WAN bandwidth and also provide safe failor over in case of link interruption, with almost zero drops. In a lab test for voice it works perfectly for voice.
• Config Change without system interruption (change config and apply it during Maintenance windows).

Read full review

• The ASR 1000 series routers can, as with most devices, improve with additional memory capacity and upgraded chip sets for faster processing.
• There seems to be limitations on the number of routing sessions the smaller ASR devices can handle, which can be overcome with proper planning and placement within the network.

Read full review

• Talari Aware management solution very complex to set up useful dashboards
• Management interface seems overly complex (7.3), though this was supposedly improved in 9.0

Read full review

• It is a healthy return on investment with planned packed size data. Average unicast latency is low and consistent with small and large packets (barring mid-sized).
• Cisco devices last longer and also have a decent trade-in policy to recover some value when equipment is replaced.
• Higher concurrent IPSec tunnels are offered, we tested for 1500+, fielding both encrypted and a mix of encrypted and cleartext traffic.

Read full review

• lowes oue WAN links Cost
• Lower our Tshoot time /remote office

Read full review