TrustRadius

Cisco 500 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 500) vs. JRR200 Route Reflector Appliance

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco 500 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 500)
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
The Cisco 500 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 500) is a highly secure and highly available access-routing platform for service providers.N/A
JRR200 Route Reflector Appliance
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
The JRR200 Route Reflector Appliance provides a solution for service provider, data center, and enterprise networks that require large routing tables. It delivers 10-GbE connectivity in a compact form factor optimized for space- and power-constrained environments.N/A
Pricing
Cisco 500 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 500)JRR200 Route Reflector Appliance
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco 500 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 500)JRR200 Route Reflector Appliance
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco 500 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 500)JRR200 Route Reflector Appliance
Best Alternatives
Cisco 500 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 500)JRR200 Route Reflector Appliance
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 8.9 out of 10
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 8.9 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 8.9 out of 10
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco 500 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 500)JRR200 Route Reflector Appliance
Likelihood to Recommend
8.2
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco 500 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 500)JRR200 Route Reflector Appliance
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
Well suited for10G aggregation at network edge. Small managed networks such as school districts or distributed enterprise campus. Not well suited to RPHY aggregation at network core — queuing in NCS540 results in jitter and poor RPHY performance. Allow port license purchases in smaller units. Better support for SLA performance monitoring capabilities would allow use as a box for 10G aggregation for Carrier Ethernet NNI handoff.
Ben Wiechman | TrustRadius Reviewer
Ben Wiechman
Director of Network Strategy and Engineering
Read full review
Juniper Networks
No answers on this topic
Pros
Cisco
  • Switching.
  • Routing.
  • Access.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Juniper Networks
No answers on this topic
Cons
Cisco
  • MPLS feature set on NCS520
  • Full support for RFC2544, Y.1564 across the product line
  • Greater clarity of the impact of smaller buffers on NCS540 when compared to other Qumran chipsets — some use cases like RPHY aggregation at network core are not a good fit.
Ben Wiechman | TrustRadius Reviewer
Ben Wiechman
Director of Network Strategy and Engineering
Read full review
Juniper Networks
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
Cisco NCS is smaller and for us newer. Better cost with similar capabilities.
Ignacy Mikos | TrustRadius Reviewer
Ignacy Mikos
Network Administrator
Read full review
Juniper Networks
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • Relatively low cost access layer device.
  • Very cost effective means of getting 10G interfaces.
  • Some features available on other devices out of the box are more complex or absent on the NCS without licensing or assistance.
Verified User
Anonymous
Read full review
Juniper Networks
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots