3 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.9 out of 100
1 Rating
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener noreferrer'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 10 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

Cisco 6000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 6000)

Suitable for all environments whether it be small or very large corporate offices. Routers are reliable and robust and if you have the budget then you should not sacrifice for cheaper.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Juniper MX Series

It is well suited as a WAN/Internet Edge device. It is easy to configure BGP, contexts and routing instances. Its suite of tools has saved our organization money by being able to provide services (tag stacking, for example) that our provider would normally charge us more for. Due to interface cost this would not be appropriate as a LAN aggregation device.
Collin Lichtenberger | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pros

Cisco 6000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 6000)

  • Packet forwarding and routing.
  • Tech support.
  • Performance.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Juniper MX Series

  • It's a robust platform, very resilient. It handles large traffic flows well.
  • It's a flexible architecture, it can be configured with provider or enterprise options (or both!)
  • It has an excellent versioning system, simple commit/confirm/rollback procedures!
Collin Lichtenberger | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

Cisco 6000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 6000)

No answers on this topic

Juniper MX Series

  • Sometimes I wish that documentation was more robust, complete, though this has been improved of late.
  • It would be nice if netflow was easier to configure.
  • It would be nice if the platform was cheaper.
Collin Lichtenberger | TrustRadius Reviewer

Alternatives Considered

Cisco 6000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 6000)

No answers on this topic

Juniper MX Series

We preferred Juniper over Cisco for our WAN/Internet routing needs for a number of reasons. First was the price, the Juniper offering was much more competitive than Cisco's. Secondly, was feature set, Juniper's implementation of routing protocols, routing tables, and forwarding options are better thought-out than Cisco's (not to mention Juniper's longstanding use of commit/confirm/rollback features, which Cisco has only started to use recently, and only on some of their products).
Collin Lichtenberger | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

Cisco 6000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 6000)

  • Easy to use.
  • Good security.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Juniper MX Series

  • Its flexible architecture and configuration styles has saved our organization money by providing feature we would have otherwise needed to purchase from our ISPs.
  • It has a long and healthy lifecycle, with potential upgrades for more performance if needed. (This helps alleviate the downtime associated with chassis replacement.)
  • The only drawback is some of the highest throughput interfaces are expensive.
Collin Lichtenberger | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pricing Details

Cisco 6000 Series Network Convergence System (NCS 6000)

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Juniper MX Series

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Add comparison