Cisco 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers (ASR 9000) vs. Cisco Meraki Z3 Teleworker

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers (ASR 9000)
ScoreĀ 9.2Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
N/A
Cisco 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers (ASR 9000) are designed to support carrier edge networks.N/A
Cisco Meraki Z3 Teleworker
ScoreĀ 9.6Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
N/A
Cisco Meraki Z3 Teleworker is an enterprise class firewall, VPN gateway and router. Each model offers five gigabit ethernet ports and wireless for connectivity. Each model is designed to securely extend the power of Meraki cloud managed networking to employees, IT staff, and executives working from home.N/A
Pricing
Cisco 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers (ASR 9000)Cisco Meraki Z3 Teleworker
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers (ASR 9000)Cisco Meraki Z3 Teleworker
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Detailsā€”ā€”
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers (ASR 9000)Cisco Meraki Z3 Teleworker
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Cisco 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers (ASR 9000)Cisco Meraki Z3 Teleworker
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
ScoreĀ 8.4Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
ScoreĀ 8.4Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Enterprises
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
ScoreĀ 8.4Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
Cisco Routers
Cisco Routers
ScoreĀ 8.4Ā outĀ ofĀ 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers (ASR 9000)Cisco Meraki Z3 Teleworker
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(22 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.1
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.6
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
8.7
(3 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco 9000 Series Aggregation Services Routers (ASR 9000)Cisco Meraki Z3 Teleworker
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
It is very well suited to act as your aggregator / core switch for mid to large facilities. it is flexible enough to really be useable in small environments but costs may hinder that. It has redundancy of power and management blades that does add a lot of peace of mind and security. Really the only reason you would not use a 9000 series is frankly cost and/or real requirements for performance. They have several versions of this model, plus they have an entire set of lines that can accommodate nearly as much as the 9000. Less demand or less of a budget can weigh in the decision to select this particular model.
Read full review
Cisco
The Cisco Meraki Z3 Teleworker appliance was ideal for scenarios where the remote worker spent the majority of their time remote. It alleviates the need for VPN software and gives the IT staff additional visibility into the connectivity of the user. We often encountered scenarios where the users broadband was having issues vs the Meraki network and the tools Meraki provides help to work through these scenarios. The case for the Meraki devices is not as strong for occasional users who cannot justify the cost of the appliance vs just logging in via VPN.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • [Cisco 9000] Series [Aggregation Services] Routers are exceptionally reliable when compared to other market options.
  • One strength of Cisco routers, in general, is their compatibility with any standard market tools from other vendors.
  • [It is] unmatched in terms of sheer performance.
  • [It] comfortably supports very strong throughput requirements.
Read full review
Cisco
  • Easy setup for remote worker
  • Versatility with WiFi and cable connections
  • Safe to outages with dual wan setup
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • [The] upgrade process [is] overly complicated compared to NX-OS or IOS. New images and the current configuration need to be compiled into "golden IOS's". If you don't include the configuration, you will have a clean device with no configuration.
  • [There are] major bugs in every release. We have had to cycle through all of our routers 3 times in the last year for updates due to show-stopping bugs that did not come to light until after the changes were made in production.
  • [It has] terrible documentation. You have to mine their site to get to any documentation for recent versions of IOS-XR. If you make the leap from 32-bit cXR to 64-bit eXR, then the documentation is more or less non-existent. Due to the internal architecture of hardware itself, technical specs can change from software version to software version, so don't expect any sort of firm scalability numbers. You'll have to rely on your sales engineer for that.
Read full review
Cisco
  • When Internet is lost and come back we need to reset the Z3 device from the dashboard in order to register the IP Phone to CUCM
  • It would be nice to manage the Z3 device to a local web portal just for TS
  • Max Speed 100Mbps. It would be nice if it could run up to 1GB
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Cisco
This depends on when Cisco EOL the product.
Read full review
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Usability
Cisco
[I am] always impressed with Cisco products, from the functionality to the customer support.
Read full review
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Cisco
In some ways, the platform is a big improvement over our previous IOS and NX-OS devices: They offer version-controlled configuration staging/commits. They have a robust portfolio of network protocols and features even beyond datacenter devices. Due to the use of NPUs instead of relying entirely on ASICs for forwarding, new versions of the software are able to improve hardware performance and capacity. Unfortunately, I have run into more bugs on IOS-XR than I ever did on IOS or even NX-OS (which has a shocking number of bugs of its own) and you have to be a licensing guru to get your order right the first time.
Read full review
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
When we are integrating the ASR9000 router with other devices then there should be the same device that can cater to the throughput. We can use the Cisco 9600 Switch which can be easily integrated and can handle the speed in terms of uplinks 40G can be handled. Adding to this Cisco DNA Center can be integrated to do the automation and monitoring purposes.
Read full review
Cisco
At the time of implementation, we were not aware of a comparable product from Cisco or comparative vendor. We had initially deployed the Z1 appliance and had so much success that the transition to the Cisco Meraki Z3 Teleworker was a quick and easy fit for us. The device is easy to deploy and just works.
Read full review
Scalability
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Cisco
The product is very scalable due to its implementation to the Meraki cloud and SD-WAN capabilities.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • We didn't need to buy new devices when we were increasing backbone capacity from 1G to 10G.
  • Due to the modular nature of the software, when there is an issue with any running services, we need not reboot the whole device which affects all clients and availability.
Read full review
Cisco
  • Good visibility for IT team so we can monitor and validate the teleworker traffic
  • Zero Touch Provisioning so we do not need to send a Engineer to configure it.
  • Consumer-grade network security
Read full review
ScreenShots