Cisco Catalyst 9120 Access Point vs D-Link Wireless

Likelihood to Recommend

Cisco Switches are most suited to larger organizations. Small networks would not really benefit from the large cost outlay and would be better off with a switch from a lower tier of Cisco's product line, or something from another manufacturer. For the 9120 range of Access Points, I would say that if you are an organization that has hardware that supports the latest WiFi 6 or the 802.11AX standards, then it is definitely worth considering getting these.

Read full review

Muhammad Mulla

Systems Administrator, Core Infrastructure & Microsoft Systems

Cancer Research UKNon-Profit Organization Management, 1001-5000 employees

View all 3 answers on this topic

Best in small networks & appropriate in industrial areas. AP works fine in any temperature & location (in remote locations office or remote location). Open area wireless connectivity is good with good range. Simple VLAN management and management are good. Backup and restoration is very good. Small home offices using wireless network work awesome.

Read full review

Irfan Ahmed

Deputy Manager

Pak Suzuki MotorsAutomotive, 1001-5000 employees

View all 2 answers on this topic

Pros

First off, the overall physical design. Slim, light, and can be mounted anywhere. Blends into ceilings/walls and is easy to mount. (Clients are very picky with overall look sometimes).
Easy to deploy and configure, making the setup very quick, minimizing any potential downtime during installation and/or maintenance upgrades.
Fast and reliable at a decent price point for the clients.

Read full review

NAKIA EPLEY

Network Field Technician

Z Networks Computer Services CorporationComputer Networking, 11-50 employees

View all 3 answers on this topic

Strong signal strength.
Can configure multiple profiles in a controller.
Whitelist and blacklist for clients.

Read full review

Engr Umer Usmani

Staff Manager IT Operations

Pak Suzuki Motor Company LimitedAutomotive, 1001-5000 employees

View all 2 answers on this topic

Cons

The Cisco Catalyst 9120 Access Point is very different from traditional AireOS devices so there is a higher learning curve.
Bugs in some of the codes.
Getting it to join a legacy Wireless LAN Controller is harder.

Read full review

Verified User

Manager in Information Technology

Mining & Metals Company, 501-1000 employees

View all 3 answers on this topic

Hanging issues are common in large scale networks. Even wireless controller is hanged in peak hours.
Issues in VLAN configuration and port configurations.
Cost is high in front of other brands.

Read full review

Irfan Ahmed

Deputy Manager

Pak Suzuki MotorsAutomotive, 1001-5000 employees

View all 2 answers on this topic

Usability

Cisco Catalyst 9120 Access Point 10.0

Based on 1 answer

The Cisco Catalyst 9120 Access Points have been a solid deployment for me. Using their interface is a mix of new and old. They run IOS, so if you know the CLI, you can easily navigate around them. You can join them to an older controller if it supports a certain version, you can join it to a new 9800 controller--very straight forward--and you can run the embedded wireless controller on them directly. I've found this to be very useful at smaller sites. The Cisco Catalyst 9120 Access Points are not limited to feature sets like the older generations' mobility express platform.

Read full review

Verified User

Manager in Information Technology

Mining & Metals Company, 501-1000 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

No score

No answers yet

No answers on this topic

Support Rating

Cisco Catalyst 9120 Access Point 10.0

Based on 1 answer

Cisco has been very good at correcting early issues with their code. Their TAC support has been fantastic when I would open a case with issues I was facing. Even though the hardware was new, they were very familiar with the interfaces and issues I was having. In the past I've been concerned about adopting a new product right away because of support issues. That was not the case here. Once I had the deployment up and running, they have had a good run of reliability.

Read full review

Verified User

Manager in Information Technology

Mining & Metals Company, 501-1000 employees

View all 1 answers on this topic

No score

No answers yet

No answers on this topic

Alternatives Considered

I have briefly evaluated the Brocade range of switches, and although they are very good value, I found that they didn't have the same range of compatibility and available expertise from other vendors in order to be able to troubleshoot issues.

Read full review

Muhammad Mulla

Systems Administrator, Core Infrastructure & Microsoft Systems

Cancer Research UKNon-Profit Organization Management, 1001-5000 employees

View all 3 answers on this topic

Against my requirement, D-link fulfills all of these including pricing, unified controller, and the mitigation of rouge APs.

Read full review

Engr Umer Usmani

Staff Manager IT Operations

Pak Suzuki Motor Company LimitedAutomotive, 1001-5000 employees

View all 2 answers on this topic

Return on Investment

Solid connectivity for clients and their vendors.
Ability to grant guest access for several different client scenarios.
High level of security.

Read full review

NAKIA EPLEY

Network Field Technician

Z Networks Computer Services CorporationComputer Networking, 11-50 employees

View all 3 answers on this topic

Organizational needs are fulfilled [which] means return on investment.
Smooth connectivity increases productivity. Yes, we are satisfied in this area.
Management and troubleshooting are core features & very quick in production area.

Read full review

Irfan Ahmed

Deputy Manager

Pak Suzuki MotorsAutomotive, 1001-5000 employees

View all 2 answers on this topic

Pricing Details

General

Free Trial

—

Free/Freemium Version

—

Premium Consulting/Integration Services

—

Entry-level set up fee?

No

General

Free Trial

—

Free/Freemium Version

—

Premium Consulting/Integration Services

—

Entry-level set up fee?

No