Cisco Cloud Web Security vs. Palo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Cisco CWS
Score 9.3 out of 10
N/A
Cisco offers Cloud Web Security (a, internet security platform / web security gateway), based on technology acquired from ScanSafe.N/A
Palo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
The majority of attacks and exposure to malicious content occurs during the normal course of web browsing activities, which requires the ability to allow safe, secure web access for all users. URL Filtering with PAN-DB automatically prevents attacks that leverage the web as an attack vector, including phishing links in emails, phishing sites, HTTP-based command and control, malicious sites and pages that carry exploit kits.N/A
Pricing
Cisco Cloud Web SecurityPalo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Cisco CWSPalo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Cisco Cloud Web SecurityPalo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
Cisco Cloud Web SecurityPalo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering
Small Businesses
1Password
1Password
Score 9.1 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
1Password
1Password
Score 9.1 out of 10
Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Kaspersky Endpoint Security
Kaspersky Endpoint Security
Score 8.9 out of 10
Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
Check Point Quantum Security Gateway
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Cisco Cloud Web SecurityPalo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
9.6
(7 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Cisco Cloud Web SecurityPalo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering
Likelihood to Recommend
Cisco
Remote and telework but not for onsite filtering.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
Because of it's complexity, Palo may not be well suited for a small organization that may not have dedicated networking staff. But for a mid to large-sized enterprise, Palo shines.
Read full review
Pros
Cisco
  • Flexibility
  • Scalable
  • Ease of administration
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Threat Detection and Prevention (Malwares, Un-Authorized Access)
  • Out of the box patterns for threat detection
  • Built in and Updated identification patterns
  • Unified Dashboard/Alerting on anomaly
Read full review
Cons
Cisco
  • Intuitiveness of the UI
  • Real time reporting
  • Report detail
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • Steep learning curve
  • The top-down URL filtering match can sometimes be tricky and requires some expertise in setting up the desired policy
Read full review
Support Rating
Cisco
No answers on this topic
Palo Alto Networks
Palo support is excellent, and I have never had to wait when contacting them for support. One of the best support teams in the business, in my opinion.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Cisco
CWS is on par with Forcepoint cloud web security. It offers flexibility and scalability.
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
Palo Alto is a much much better product. detailed options and controls, more visibility, and usability. Better performance and durability.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Cisco
  • Increased security
  • Decrease in number of infections
Read full review
Palo Alto Networks
  • We stopped to looking for external content filtering after acquiring PA URL Filtering
  • The dynamic updates help us to mitigate security issues caused by BAD URLs
  • Palo Alto Networks Advanced URL Filtering is helping us to achieve the high reliability of the Network
Read full review
ScreenShots