Cisco Cloud Web Security vs. Webroot DNS Protection

Remote and telework but not for onsite filtering.

Incentivized

If you already have Webroot AV, it makes sense to continue with the same vendor. It's pretty cheap compared to some solutions, so it might be the case that it's this or nothing, in which case this is a no brainer. If you are an MSP, this is an easy product to sell, and requires very little maintenance. you do need to monitor it but it runs itself most of the time. If you are a customer with >50 users, you should really be looking for a product that is a bit higher up the food chain

Incentivized

• Flexibility
• Scalable
• Ease of administration

Incentivized

• Enforcing organisational policies regarding internet usage, such as blocking access to certain types of websites (e.g., gambling, social networking, etc.)
• Prevent malware infections
• Protection from various phishing attempts

Incentivized

• Intuitiveness of the UI
• Real time reporting
• Report detail

Incentivized

• Integration with G-Suite, O365, Active Directory, SIS, etc.
• Increase the number of third-party integrations.
• It can be expensive to implement, depending on the size of the network.
• It does not offer additional features and options beyond basic protection.

CWS is on par with Forcepoint cloud web security. It offers flexibility and scalability.

Incentivized

Webroot stacks right up with the top vendors in this tier. Priced right and MSP ready.

Incentivized

• Increased security
• Decrease in number of infections

Incentivized

• Much reduced time spent on malware issues at small business customers
• Slightly increased revenue as this fills a space that didn't used to exist in our stack
• Customers satisfaction went up due to the added ability to block certain content quickly and easily

Incentivized