Cisco CloudLock vs. Skyhigh Cloud Access Security Broker

Cisco Cloudlock is a good fit for my organization consisting of 150 end users. While we have a small office product that can expand to cover any size organization, I would assume the overhead to monitor would increase. While my organization's business is in real estate, I would highly recommend this for all businesses that handle sensitive and private data. Being able to monitor our cloud infrastructure has allowed our security team to be more flexible in allowing approved users access as well.

Incentivized

Skyhigh is best suited for notifying us of the bad services which are being run in the organization. It really reduces the time it takes for in-depth analysis of proxy logs. It is also helpful for notifying us of any abnormal activities performed by the users in the cloud apps. For example, if a user has left the company and then there was a huge amount of files downloaded from his drive, we may not have known. Here, Skyhigh helps by notifying us of anomaly-like data (high amounts of download and upload activities performed). This is one of the best scenarios I can say, where we see what actually is happening in the cloud drives for the organization. It also helps by notifying if there is any service or activity performed against any sort of compliance with its own mechanisms.

Incentivized

• Cisco CloudLock offers a remote access options, very efficient and standard.
• Robust data security and monitoring of the sensitive database.
• Has an excellent self service, which is an option for quick operational progress.

Incentivized

• Highly accurate and detailed analysis
• Identifies and rates high risk resources
• Can be easily fused with several other apps especially Microsoft Office
• The encryption service

Incentivized

• Although alert mechanism is good but it delays a bit.
• For implementation of DLP we had to hire a expert it took a lot of time to set up.
• Support [in my experience] is not good.

Incentivized

• UI side is not that great.
• Hard to detect every attack or event.
• Not work in real time means there is a latency in detection.

Incentivized

Skyhigh is a leading CASB helps in identifying the bad services and protecting user data with a detokenization feature and also with the anomalies triggering alarms to customers for any suspicious activities. It provides users by providing blocking script to block service on the proxy or firewall and also shows the abilities to the user to balance the weight of risk service.

Incentivized

They are very quick to respond and go the extra mile to help address our issues. That said, we've only needed them at the early stages of implementation for support help and occasionally when we want to do a full re-scan of our site. They are very flexible in working with us on the timing of such scans.

Incentivized

Amazon Macie is limited to an AWS environment and fulfills some of the same functions that CloudLock does in SaaS products. Both are very valuable tools, so the decision is not really which to use, but whether to use both for their respective environments. In general I feel CloudLock is a more powerful tool because it connects to Microsoft 365, which is more business critical for our organization, but that really is a personal call.

Incentivized

We felt like when we looked at at Netskope, Skyhigh had the most complete vision. They also have custom apps which I am not aware of other services being able to do

Incentivized

• Allowed data to be accessed.
• Secured data.
• Meet client security requirements.

Incentivized

• Reduction of high risks.
• Allowed to set up policies.